Language acts of sarcastic irony: argumentative considerations in textual linguistics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da ANPOLL (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1900 |
Resumo: | In this work, we consider some characteristics of interactions that make use of sarcastic irony, seen here as an argumentative strategy that can only be interpreted taking into account the totality of the unit of meanings in context. Our objective is to elaborate an analysis of texts containing irony linguistically marked by referential and intertextual processes. The analyzed examples, part of the mediatic discursive domain, are illustrative of the hypothesis that it is necessary to consider, in the interpretation of irony, interactional aspects (HUTCHEON, 2000), the communicative circuit, in which the presence of the third party must be contemplated, in addition to of speakers and interlocutors; the enunciative heterogeneity and the crossing of points of view; the referential networks in the argumentative orientation and the intertextual appeals. by Sperber and Wilson (1990) on direct and indirect “mentions”; irony can only be adequately analyzed in view of its occurrence in the unit of communication and meaning in a broad context, which is the text. Only in the completeness of the interaction in context the phenomenon of irony can be fully embraced. |
id |
ANPOLL-2_902825ba3590807756101829ae02781c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br:article/1900 |
network_acronym_str |
ANPOLL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista da ANPOLL (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Language acts of sarcastic irony: argumentative considerations in textual linguisticsAtos linguageiros de ironia sarcástica: considerações argumentativas em linguística textualIroniaAresta críticaIntertextualidadeContextoIronyCritical EdgeIntertextualityContextIn this work, we consider some characteristics of interactions that make use of sarcastic irony, seen here as an argumentative strategy that can only be interpreted taking into account the totality of the unit of meanings in context. Our objective is to elaborate an analysis of texts containing irony linguistically marked by referential and intertextual processes. The analyzed examples, part of the mediatic discursive domain, are illustrative of the hypothesis that it is necessary to consider, in the interpretation of irony, interactional aspects (HUTCHEON, 2000), the communicative circuit, in which the presence of the third party must be contemplated, in addition to of speakers and interlocutors; the enunciative heterogeneity and the crossing of points of view; the referential networks in the argumentative orientation and the intertextual appeals. by Sperber and Wilson (1990) on direct and indirect “mentions”; irony can only be adequately analyzed in view of its occurrence in the unit of communication and meaning in a broad context, which is the text. Only in the completeness of the interaction in context the phenomenon of irony can be fully embraced.Neste trabalho, ponderamos sobre algumas características das interações que fazem uso de ironia sarcástica, vista aqui como uma estratégia argumentativa que só pode interpretada tendo em conta a totalidade da unidade de sentidos em contexto. Nosso objetivo é elaborar uma análise de textos contendo ironia linguisticamente marcada por processos referenciais e intertextuais. Os exemplos analisados, integrantes do domínio discursivo midiático, são ilustrativos da hipótese de que é necessário considerar, na interpretação da ironia, os aspectos interacionais (HUTCHEON, 2000), o circuito comunicativo, no qual deve ser contemplada a presença do terceiro, além de locutores e interlocutores; a heterogeneidade enunciativa e o cruzamento de pontos de vista; as redes referenciais na orientação argumentativa e os apelos intertextuais. Verificamos, ainda, as hipóteses de que a ironia tem como traço constitutivo o recurso à intertextualidade, com base nas reflexões de Sperber e Wilson (1990) sobre “menções” diretas e indiretas; a ironia só pode ser adequadamente analisada tendo em vista sua ocorrência na unidade de comunicação e de sentido em contexto amplo, que é o texto. Só na completude da interação em contexto o fenômeno da ironia pode ser inteiramente abarcado.ANPOLL2023-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/190010.18309/ranpoll.v54i1.1900Revista da Anpoll; Vol. 54 No. 1 (2023); e1900Revista da Anpoll; v. 54 n. 1 (2023); e19001982-78301414-756410.18309/ranpoll.v54i1reponame:Revista da ANPOLL (Online)instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL)instacron:ANPOLLporhttps://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1900/1389Copyright (c) 2023 Revista da Anpollhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCavalcante, Mônica MagalhãesBrito, Mariza Angélica PaivaFaria, Maria da Graça dos Santos2024-01-26T21:03:24Zoai:ojs.revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br:article/1900Revistahttps://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/indexONGhttps://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/oairevistadaanpoll@gmail.com1982-78301414-7564opendoar:2024-01-26T21:03:24Revista da ANPOLL (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Language acts of sarcastic irony: argumentative considerations in textual linguistics Atos linguageiros de ironia sarcástica: considerações argumentativas em linguística textual |
title |
Language acts of sarcastic irony: argumentative considerations in textual linguistics |
spellingShingle |
Language acts of sarcastic irony: argumentative considerations in textual linguistics Cavalcante, Mônica Magalhães Ironia Aresta crítica Intertextualidade Contexto Irony Critical Edge Intertextuality Context |
title_short |
Language acts of sarcastic irony: argumentative considerations in textual linguistics |
title_full |
Language acts of sarcastic irony: argumentative considerations in textual linguistics |
title_fullStr |
Language acts of sarcastic irony: argumentative considerations in textual linguistics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Language acts of sarcastic irony: argumentative considerations in textual linguistics |
title_sort |
Language acts of sarcastic irony: argumentative considerations in textual linguistics |
author |
Cavalcante, Mônica Magalhães |
author_facet |
Cavalcante, Mônica Magalhães Brito, Mariza Angélica Paiva Faria, Maria da Graça dos Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Brito, Mariza Angélica Paiva Faria, Maria da Graça dos Santos |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cavalcante, Mônica Magalhães Brito, Mariza Angélica Paiva Faria, Maria da Graça dos Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ironia Aresta crítica Intertextualidade Contexto Irony Critical Edge Intertextuality Context |
topic |
Ironia Aresta crítica Intertextualidade Contexto Irony Critical Edge Intertextuality Context |
description |
In this work, we consider some characteristics of interactions that make use of sarcastic irony, seen here as an argumentative strategy that can only be interpreted taking into account the totality of the unit of meanings in context. Our objective is to elaborate an analysis of texts containing irony linguistically marked by referential and intertextual processes. The analyzed examples, part of the mediatic discursive domain, are illustrative of the hypothesis that it is necessary to consider, in the interpretation of irony, interactional aspects (HUTCHEON, 2000), the communicative circuit, in which the presence of the third party must be contemplated, in addition to of speakers and interlocutors; the enunciative heterogeneity and the crossing of points of view; the referential networks in the argumentative orientation and the intertextual appeals. by Sperber and Wilson (1990) on direct and indirect “mentions”; irony can only be adequately analyzed in view of its occurrence in the unit of communication and meaning in a broad context, which is the text. Only in the completeness of the interaction in context the phenomenon of irony can be fully embraced. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1900 10.18309/ranpoll.v54i1.1900 |
url |
https://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1900 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18309/ranpoll.v54i1.1900 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1900/1389 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista da Anpoll https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista da Anpoll https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPOLL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPOLL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Anpoll; Vol. 54 No. 1 (2023); e1900 Revista da Anpoll; v. 54 n. 1 (2023); e1900 1982-7830 1414-7564 10.18309/ranpoll.v54i1 reponame:Revista da ANPOLL (Online) instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL) instacron:ANPOLL |
instname_str |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL) |
instacron_str |
ANPOLL |
institution |
ANPOLL |
reponame_str |
Revista da ANPOLL (Online) |
collection |
Revista da ANPOLL (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ANPOLL (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadaanpoll@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797051176516059136 |