Sustainability Assessment of Sanitation Indicators in the PCJ Watersheds 2020-2035 Plan
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2021000101201 |
Resumo: | Abstract Understanding how variables that integrate sustainability indexes behave is essential due to the limitation of natural resources under a growing demand. Based on case study and exploratory research techniques, this paper aimed to analyze the levels of collected and treated wastewater in the PCJ Basins Water Resources Plan for the 2020-35 period. We sought to validate the indicators based on Gibson’s sustainability principles, relating them to the 6.2 and 6.3 targets of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6. It was concluded that the indicators are important to evaluate processes to achieve SDG 6. However, the indicators have flaws and can mask important information, preventing more assertive decision making. The target to achieve the 2035 reference scenario was found to be valid for four of Gibson’s sustainability principles. |
id |
ANPPAS-1_22890be4fb5f1c5681a24e4c122673ef |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1414-753X2021000101201 |
network_acronym_str |
ANPPAS-1 |
network_name_str |
Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sustainability Assessment of Sanitation Indicators in the PCJ Watersheds 2020-2035 PlanSustainability indicatorsSDG 6Gibson’s sustainability principalssustainable basinsAbstract Understanding how variables that integrate sustainability indexes behave is essential due to the limitation of natural resources under a growing demand. Based on case study and exploratory research techniques, this paper aimed to analyze the levels of collected and treated wastewater in the PCJ Basins Water Resources Plan for the 2020-35 period. We sought to validate the indicators based on Gibson’s sustainability principles, relating them to the 6.2 and 6.3 targets of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6. It was concluded that the indicators are important to evaluate processes to achieve SDG 6. However, the indicators have flaws and can mask important information, preventing more assertive decision making. The target to achieve the 2035 reference scenario was found to be valid for four of Gibson’s sustainability principles.ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2021000101201Ambiente & Sociedade v.24 2021reponame:Ambiente & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:ANPPAS10.1590/1809-4422asoc20200247vu2021l4deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBega,João Miguel MercesBorges,André do ValeLago,César Ambrogi Ferreira doMendes,Jakeline PertileAzevedo,Paulo de Tarso deSantos,Welington José Rocha dosMariosa,Duarcides Ferreiraeng2021-10-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1414-753X2021000101201Revistahttp://anpocs.com/index.php/revista-ambiente-e-sociedadehttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistaambienteesociedade@gmail.com1809-44221414-753Xopendoar:2021-10-29T00:00Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sustainability Assessment of Sanitation Indicators in the PCJ Watersheds 2020-2035 Plan |
title |
Sustainability Assessment of Sanitation Indicators in the PCJ Watersheds 2020-2035 Plan |
spellingShingle |
Sustainability Assessment of Sanitation Indicators in the PCJ Watersheds 2020-2035 Plan Bega,João Miguel Merces Sustainability indicators SDG 6 Gibson’s sustainability principals sustainable basins |
title_short |
Sustainability Assessment of Sanitation Indicators in the PCJ Watersheds 2020-2035 Plan |
title_full |
Sustainability Assessment of Sanitation Indicators in the PCJ Watersheds 2020-2035 Plan |
title_fullStr |
Sustainability Assessment of Sanitation Indicators in the PCJ Watersheds 2020-2035 Plan |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sustainability Assessment of Sanitation Indicators in the PCJ Watersheds 2020-2035 Plan |
title_sort |
Sustainability Assessment of Sanitation Indicators in the PCJ Watersheds 2020-2035 Plan |
author |
Bega,João Miguel Merces |
author_facet |
Bega,João Miguel Merces Borges,André do Vale Lago,César Ambrogi Ferreira do Mendes,Jakeline Pertile Azevedo,Paulo de Tarso de Santos,Welington José Rocha dos Mariosa,Duarcides Ferreira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Borges,André do Vale Lago,César Ambrogi Ferreira do Mendes,Jakeline Pertile Azevedo,Paulo de Tarso de Santos,Welington José Rocha dos Mariosa,Duarcides Ferreira |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bega,João Miguel Merces Borges,André do Vale Lago,César Ambrogi Ferreira do Mendes,Jakeline Pertile Azevedo,Paulo de Tarso de Santos,Welington José Rocha dos Mariosa,Duarcides Ferreira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sustainability indicators SDG 6 Gibson’s sustainability principals sustainable basins |
topic |
Sustainability indicators SDG 6 Gibson’s sustainability principals sustainable basins |
description |
Abstract Understanding how variables that integrate sustainability indexes behave is essential due to the limitation of natural resources under a growing demand. Based on case study and exploratory research techniques, this paper aimed to analyze the levels of collected and treated wastewater in the PCJ Basins Water Resources Plan for the 2020-35 period. We sought to validate the indicators based on Gibson’s sustainability principles, relating them to the 6.2 and 6.3 targets of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6. It was concluded that the indicators are important to evaluate processes to achieve SDG 6. However, the indicators have flaws and can mask important information, preventing more assertive decision making. The target to achieve the 2035 reference scenario was found to be valid for four of Gibson’s sustainability principles. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2021000101201 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2021000101201 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1809-4422asoc20200247vu2021l4de |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ambiente & Sociedade v.24 2021 reponame:Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:ANPPAS |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
ANPPAS |
institution |
ANPPAS |
reponame_str |
Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaambienteesociedade@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754209167404433408 |