BIOCAPACITY OF BRAZILIAN BIOMES USING EMERGY ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT CONCEPTS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2021000100340 |
Resumo: | Abstract This work aimed to assess Brazilian biomes’ biocapacity (BC) using concepts of the Emergy Ecological Footprint method. Climate and forest cover data were interpolated using the Kriging method. In 2016, the Brazilian BC was among the largest in the world, 42.11 gha / cap. The biomes’ forest coverage areas were investigated and simulated in two scenarios: optimistic (with 100% forest coverage) and pessimistic (only 10%). The Amazon’s contribution of half the Brazilian BC would reduce by 88% in a pessimistic scenario. The Atlantic Forest contribution was only 1.9% of the national BC, however, in an optimistic scenario, it would increase by 690%. The reduction of deforestation, fires and expansion of areas protected by law are measures that positively impact the BC of the studied biomes. This methodology can be used as an environmental quality indicator as it adheres to the principles of Sustainable Development. |
id |
ANPPAS-1_6bb30f221d49acfc10d28b06ca46db2b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1414-753X2021000100340 |
network_acronym_str |
ANPPAS-1 |
network_name_str |
Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
BIOCAPACITY OF BRAZILIAN BIOMES USING EMERGY ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT CONCEPTSEnvironmental ManagementEmergySustainability IndicatorsSustainable DevelopmentAbstract This work aimed to assess Brazilian biomes’ biocapacity (BC) using concepts of the Emergy Ecological Footprint method. Climate and forest cover data were interpolated using the Kriging method. In 2016, the Brazilian BC was among the largest in the world, 42.11 gha / cap. The biomes’ forest coverage areas were investigated and simulated in two scenarios: optimistic (with 100% forest coverage) and pessimistic (only 10%). The Amazon’s contribution of half the Brazilian BC would reduce by 88% in a pessimistic scenario. The Atlantic Forest contribution was only 1.9% of the national BC, however, in an optimistic scenario, it would increase by 690%. The reduction of deforestation, fires and expansion of areas protected by law are measures that positively impact the BC of the studied biomes. This methodology can be used as an environmental quality indicator as it adheres to the principles of Sustainable Development.ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2021000100340Ambiente & Sociedade v.24 2021reponame:Ambiente & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:ANPPAS10.1590/1809-4422asoc20180134r2vu2021l5aoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,Wallan Azevedo dosErthal Junior,MiltonBarcellos,Renato Gomes Sobraleng2021-12-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1414-753X2021000100340Revistahttp://anpocs.com/index.php/revista-ambiente-e-sociedadehttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistaambienteesociedade@gmail.com1809-44221414-753Xopendoar:2021-12-03T00:00Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
BIOCAPACITY OF BRAZILIAN BIOMES USING EMERGY ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT CONCEPTS |
title |
BIOCAPACITY OF BRAZILIAN BIOMES USING EMERGY ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT CONCEPTS |
spellingShingle |
BIOCAPACITY OF BRAZILIAN BIOMES USING EMERGY ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT CONCEPTS Santos,Wallan Azevedo dos Environmental Management Emergy Sustainability Indicators Sustainable Development |
title_short |
BIOCAPACITY OF BRAZILIAN BIOMES USING EMERGY ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT CONCEPTS |
title_full |
BIOCAPACITY OF BRAZILIAN BIOMES USING EMERGY ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT CONCEPTS |
title_fullStr |
BIOCAPACITY OF BRAZILIAN BIOMES USING EMERGY ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT CONCEPTS |
title_full_unstemmed |
BIOCAPACITY OF BRAZILIAN BIOMES USING EMERGY ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT CONCEPTS |
title_sort |
BIOCAPACITY OF BRAZILIAN BIOMES USING EMERGY ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT CONCEPTS |
author |
Santos,Wallan Azevedo dos |
author_facet |
Santos,Wallan Azevedo dos Erthal Junior,Milton Barcellos,Renato Gomes Sobral |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Erthal Junior,Milton Barcellos,Renato Gomes Sobral |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos,Wallan Azevedo dos Erthal Junior,Milton Barcellos,Renato Gomes Sobral |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Environmental Management Emergy Sustainability Indicators Sustainable Development |
topic |
Environmental Management Emergy Sustainability Indicators Sustainable Development |
description |
Abstract This work aimed to assess Brazilian biomes’ biocapacity (BC) using concepts of the Emergy Ecological Footprint method. Climate and forest cover data were interpolated using the Kriging method. In 2016, the Brazilian BC was among the largest in the world, 42.11 gha / cap. The biomes’ forest coverage areas were investigated and simulated in two scenarios: optimistic (with 100% forest coverage) and pessimistic (only 10%). The Amazon’s contribution of half the Brazilian BC would reduce by 88% in a pessimistic scenario. The Atlantic Forest contribution was only 1.9% of the national BC, however, in an optimistic scenario, it would increase by 690%. The reduction of deforestation, fires and expansion of areas protected by law are measures that positively impact the BC of the studied biomes. This methodology can be used as an environmental quality indicator as it adheres to the principles of Sustainable Development. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2021000100340 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2021000100340 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1809-4422asoc20180134r2vu2021l5ao |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ambiente & Sociedade v.24 2021 reponame:Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:ANPPAS |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
ANPPAS |
institution |
ANPPAS |
reponame_str |
Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaambienteesociedade@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754209167371927552 |