Case study in public administration: a critical review of Brazilian scientific production

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guerra,Mariana
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Gomes,Adalmir de Oliveira, Silva Filho,Antônio Isidro da
Tipo de documento: Relatório
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552015000200270
Resumo: This paper presents a critical review of 47 articles published between 2006 and 2011 to identify how case studies have been applied in Brazilian research on public administration. In addition to their theoretical and methodological characteristics, four further specific topics of interest were addressed: (a) what is meant by case study; (b) the relationship between the phenomenon of interest and the case under investigation; (c) the possibility of replication; and (d) how the supposed method contributes towards the development of the field of public administration. The main inconsistencies found were: the methodological descriptions are confusing; the results are inconsistent compared with data gathering procedures and data analysis techniques; a lack of information about the number of interviewed individuals; and no descriptions of research variables. The results suggest the reviewed case studies present methodological inconsistencies and limitations, which undermine their scientific value and relevance to academic work in Brazil.
id ANPPGA-1_c2f8b9fc43f815ad7fef39636807a678
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1415-65552015000200270
network_acronym_str ANPPGA-1
network_name_str RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Case study in public administration: a critical review of Brazilian scientific productionpublic administrationcase studyqualitative researchmethodThis paper presents a critical review of 47 articles published between 2006 and 2011 to identify how case studies have been applied in Brazilian research on public administration. In addition to their theoretical and methodological characteristics, four further specific topics of interest were addressed: (a) what is meant by case study; (b) the relationship between the phenomenon of interest and the case under investigation; (c) the possibility of replication; and (d) how the supposed method contributes towards the development of the field of public administration. The main inconsistencies found were: the methodological descriptions are confusing; the results are inconsistent compared with data gathering procedures and data analysis techniques; a lack of information about the number of interviewed individuals; and no descriptions of research variables. The results suggest the reviewed case studies present methodological inconsistencies and limitations, which undermine their scientific value and relevance to academic work in Brazil.Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração2015-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/reportinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552015000200270Revista de Administração Contemporânea v.19 n.2 2015reponame:RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)instacron:ANPAD10.1590/1982-7849rac20151282info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuerra,MarianaGomes,Adalmir de OliveiraSilva Filho,Antônio Isidro daeng2015-09-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-65552015000200270Revistahttps://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/racONGhttps://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/oairac@anpad.org.br1982-78491415-6555opendoar:2015-09-15T00:00RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Case study in public administration: a critical review of Brazilian scientific production
title Case study in public administration: a critical review of Brazilian scientific production
spellingShingle Case study in public administration: a critical review of Brazilian scientific production
Guerra,Mariana
public administration
case study
qualitative research
method
title_short Case study in public administration: a critical review of Brazilian scientific production
title_full Case study in public administration: a critical review of Brazilian scientific production
title_fullStr Case study in public administration: a critical review of Brazilian scientific production
title_full_unstemmed Case study in public administration: a critical review of Brazilian scientific production
title_sort Case study in public administration: a critical review of Brazilian scientific production
author Guerra,Mariana
author_facet Guerra,Mariana
Gomes,Adalmir de Oliveira
Silva Filho,Antônio Isidro da
author_role author
author2 Gomes,Adalmir de Oliveira
Silva Filho,Antônio Isidro da
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guerra,Mariana
Gomes,Adalmir de Oliveira
Silva Filho,Antônio Isidro da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv public administration
case study
qualitative research
method
topic public administration
case study
qualitative research
method
description This paper presents a critical review of 47 articles published between 2006 and 2011 to identify how case studies have been applied in Brazilian research on public administration. In addition to their theoretical and methodological characteristics, four further specific topics of interest were addressed: (a) what is meant by case study; (b) the relationship between the phenomenon of interest and the case under investigation; (c) the possibility of replication; and (d) how the supposed method contributes towards the development of the field of public administration. The main inconsistencies found were: the methodological descriptions are confusing; the results are inconsistent compared with data gathering procedures and data analysis techniques; a lack of information about the number of interviewed individuals; and no descriptions of research variables. The results suggest the reviewed case studies present methodological inconsistencies and limitations, which undermine their scientific value and relevance to academic work in Brazil.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/report
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format report
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552015000200270
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552015000200270
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1982-7849rac20151282
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Contemporânea v.19 n.2 2015
reponame:RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
instacron:ANPAD
instname_str Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
instacron_str ANPAD
institution ANPAD
reponame_str RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
collection RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rac@anpad.org.br
_version_ 1754209052852748288