Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Popadiuk,Silvio
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Bido,Diógenes de Souza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552016000200238
Resumo: Abstract This paper presents an empirical relationship among exploration, exploitation, and organizational coordination mechanisms, classified as the centralization of decision-making, formalization, and connectedness. In order to analyze the findings of this survey, we used two techniques: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM). Our analysis was supported by 249 answers from managers of companies located in Brazil (convenience sampling). Contrary to expectations, centralization and exploitation were negatively associated. Our data supports the research hypothesis that formalization is positively associated with exploitation. Although the relationship between formalization and exploration were significant, the result is contrary to the research hypothesis that we made. The relationships among connectedness and exploitation, and connectedness and exploration were both positive and significant. This relationship means that the more connectedness increases, the higher the likelihood of exploitation and exploration.
id ANPPGA-1_e3f19193eba4a562b27e2b8bbd99daf4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1415-65552016000200238
network_acronym_str ANPPGA-1
network_name_str RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination MechanismscentralizationformalizationconnectednessexplorationexploitationAbstract This paper presents an empirical relationship among exploration, exploitation, and organizational coordination mechanisms, classified as the centralization of decision-making, formalization, and connectedness. In order to analyze the findings of this survey, we used two techniques: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM). Our analysis was supported by 249 answers from managers of companies located in Brazil (convenience sampling). Contrary to expectations, centralization and exploitation were negatively associated. Our data supports the research hypothesis that formalization is positively associated with exploitation. Although the relationship between formalization and exploration were significant, the result is contrary to the research hypothesis that we made. The relationships among connectedness and exploitation, and connectedness and exploration were both positive and significant. This relationship means that the more connectedness increases, the higher the likelihood of exploitation and exploration.Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração2016-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552016000200238Revista de Administração Contemporânea v.20 n.2 2016reponame:RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)instacron:ANPAD10.1590/1982-7849rac2016150018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPopadiuk,SilvioBido,Diógenes de Souzaeng2016-12-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-65552016000200238Revistahttps://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/racONGhttps://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/oairac@anpad.org.br1982-78491415-6555opendoar:2016-12-16T00:00RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms
title Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms
spellingShingle Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms
Popadiuk,Silvio
centralization
formalization
connectedness
exploration
exploitation
title_short Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms
title_full Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms
title_fullStr Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms
title_sort Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms
author Popadiuk,Silvio
author_facet Popadiuk,Silvio
Bido,Diógenes de Souza
author_role author
author2 Bido,Diógenes de Souza
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Popadiuk,Silvio
Bido,Diógenes de Souza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv centralization
formalization
connectedness
exploration
exploitation
topic centralization
formalization
connectedness
exploration
exploitation
description Abstract This paper presents an empirical relationship among exploration, exploitation, and organizational coordination mechanisms, classified as the centralization of decision-making, formalization, and connectedness. In order to analyze the findings of this survey, we used two techniques: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM). Our analysis was supported by 249 answers from managers of companies located in Brazil (convenience sampling). Contrary to expectations, centralization and exploitation were negatively associated. Our data supports the research hypothesis that formalization is positively associated with exploitation. Although the relationship between formalization and exploration were significant, the result is contrary to the research hypothesis that we made. The relationships among connectedness and exploitation, and connectedness and exploration were both positive and significant. This relationship means that the more connectedness increases, the higher the likelihood of exploitation and exploration.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552016000200238
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552016000200238
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1982-7849rac2016150018
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Contemporânea v.20 n.2 2016
reponame:RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
instacron:ANPAD
instname_str Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
instacron_str ANPAD
institution ANPAD
reponame_str RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
collection RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rac@anpad.org.br
_version_ 1754209052950265856