Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552016000200238 |
Resumo: | Abstract This paper presents an empirical relationship among exploration, exploitation, and organizational coordination mechanisms, classified as the centralization of decision-making, formalization, and connectedness. In order to analyze the findings of this survey, we used two techniques: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM). Our analysis was supported by 249 answers from managers of companies located in Brazil (convenience sampling). Contrary to expectations, centralization and exploitation were negatively associated. Our data supports the research hypothesis that formalization is positively associated with exploitation. Although the relationship between formalization and exploration were significant, the result is contrary to the research hypothesis that we made. The relationships among connectedness and exploitation, and connectedness and exploration were both positive and significant. This relationship means that the more connectedness increases, the higher the likelihood of exploitation and exploration. |
id |
ANPPGA-1_e3f19193eba4a562b27e2b8bbd99daf4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1415-65552016000200238 |
network_acronym_str |
ANPPGA-1 |
network_name_str |
RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination MechanismscentralizationformalizationconnectednessexplorationexploitationAbstract This paper presents an empirical relationship among exploration, exploitation, and organizational coordination mechanisms, classified as the centralization of decision-making, formalization, and connectedness. In order to analyze the findings of this survey, we used two techniques: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM). Our analysis was supported by 249 answers from managers of companies located in Brazil (convenience sampling). Contrary to expectations, centralization and exploitation were negatively associated. Our data supports the research hypothesis that formalization is positively associated with exploitation. Although the relationship between formalization and exploration were significant, the result is contrary to the research hypothesis that we made. The relationships among connectedness and exploitation, and connectedness and exploration were both positive and significant. This relationship means that the more connectedness increases, the higher the likelihood of exploitation and exploration.Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração2016-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552016000200238Revista de Administração Contemporânea v.20 n.2 2016reponame:RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)instacron:ANPAD10.1590/1982-7849rac2016150018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPopadiuk,SilvioBido,Diógenes de Souzaeng2016-12-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-65552016000200238Revistahttps://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/racONGhttps://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/oairac@anpad.org.br1982-78491415-6555opendoar:2016-12-16T00:00RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms |
title |
Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms |
spellingShingle |
Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms Popadiuk,Silvio centralization formalization connectedness exploration exploitation |
title_short |
Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms |
title_full |
Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms |
title_fullStr |
Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms |
title_sort |
Exploration, Exploitation, and Organizational Coordination Mechanisms |
author |
Popadiuk,Silvio |
author_facet |
Popadiuk,Silvio Bido,Diógenes de Souza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bido,Diógenes de Souza |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Popadiuk,Silvio Bido,Diógenes de Souza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
centralization formalization connectedness exploration exploitation |
topic |
centralization formalization connectedness exploration exploitation |
description |
Abstract This paper presents an empirical relationship among exploration, exploitation, and organizational coordination mechanisms, classified as the centralization of decision-making, formalization, and connectedness. In order to analyze the findings of this survey, we used two techniques: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM). Our analysis was supported by 249 answers from managers of companies located in Brazil (convenience sampling). Contrary to expectations, centralization and exploitation were negatively associated. Our data supports the research hypothesis that formalization is positively associated with exploitation. Although the relationship between formalization and exploration were significant, the result is contrary to the research hypothesis that we made. The relationships among connectedness and exploitation, and connectedness and exploration were both positive and significant. This relationship means that the more connectedness increases, the higher the likelihood of exploitation and exploration. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552016000200238 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552016000200238 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1982-7849rac2016150018 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Contemporânea v.20 n.2 2016 reponame:RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) instacron:ANPAD |
instname_str |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
instacron_str |
ANPAD |
institution |
ANPAD |
reponame_str |
RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) |
collection |
RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rac@anpad.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209052950265856 |