Tourism as a gift? An “ethnography of exchanges” and the offer of an alleged community-based tourism experience in Anã / Santarém / Pará
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo |
Texto Completo: | https://rbtur.org.br/rbtur/article/view/1568 |
Resumo: | This article intends to demonstrate that the experience of tourism carried out in the community of Anã/Santarém/Pará includes several relations of reciprocity, according to Mauss’ conception (1925/2017). For this author, the Gift is ambivalent, as it is simultaneously interested and disinterested, willingly offered and at the same time obligatory. The ambivalent character of the Gift was understood by means of the notion of interest, as established by Bourdieu (2011). The field work followed the assumptions of the ethnographic research, and the methodological path was built from the conception of Lanna (2000) about the “ethnography of the gift”. The data were collected through direct observation and interviews, in two periods: August of 2016 and January of 2017. We want to point out as main results: the observation of five reciprocity relations among the internal and external agents to the community of Anã, which involves many kind of “payments”, as Mauss defines it (1925/2017); the interpretation of tourism as a Gift in social environment in which the activity promotes the reciprocity of things and of its spiritual and symbolic meanings in an ambivalent way; the observation that the community does not hold autonomy to manage tourism in its territory. We consider that the experience of Anã did not amass, yet, the required elements to be regarded as a community-based tourism. |
id |
ANPPGT-1_abc8da1ad4c70ca12da2ae5aaa45a7c9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1568 |
network_acronym_str |
ANPPGT-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Tourism as a gift? An “ethnography of exchanges” and the offer of an alleged community-based tourism experience in Anã / Santarém / Pará¿El turismo es un don? Una "etnografía de los cambios" y la oferta de la experiencia "llamada" Turismo de Base Comunitaria en Anã / Santarém / ParáO turismo é uma dádiva? Uma “etnografia das trocas” e a oferta da experiência “chamada” Turismo de Base Comunitária em Anã/Santarém/ParáCommunity-based tourismGiftEthnography of the gift.Turismo de Base ComunitariaDonEtnografía del cambio.Turismo de Base ComunitáriaDádivaEtnografia da troca. This article intends to demonstrate that the experience of tourism carried out in the community of Anã/Santarém/Pará includes several relations of reciprocity, according to Mauss’ conception (1925/2017). For this author, the Gift is ambivalent, as it is simultaneously interested and disinterested, willingly offered and at the same time obligatory. The ambivalent character of the Gift was understood by means of the notion of interest, as established by Bourdieu (2011). The field work followed the assumptions of the ethnographic research, and the methodological path was built from the conception of Lanna (2000) about the “ethnography of the gift”. The data were collected through direct observation and interviews, in two periods: August of 2016 and January of 2017. We want to point out as main results: the observation of five reciprocity relations among the internal and external agents to the community of Anã, which involves many kind of “payments”, as Mauss defines it (1925/2017); the interpretation of tourism as a Gift in social environment in which the activity promotes the reciprocity of things and of its spiritual and symbolic meanings in an ambivalent way; the observation that the community does not hold autonomy to manage tourism in its territory. We consider that the experience of Anã did not amass, yet, the required elements to be regarded as a community-based tourism. Este artículo tiene por objetivo mostrar que la experiencia de turismo desarrollada en la comunidad de Anã/Santarém/Pará involucra varias relaciones de intercambio y reciprocidad, conforme a la concepción de Mauss (1925/2017). Para este autor, el don es ambivalente, pues, es a la vez, interesada y desinteresada, voluntaria y obligatoria. El carácter ambivalente de la dádiva fue comprendido por la noción de interés postulada por Bourdieu (2011). La investigación de campo siguió los presupuestos de la investigación etnográfica antropológica, y el camino metodológico fue construido a partir de la concepción de Lanna (2000) sobre la "etnografía del cambio". Los datos fueron recogidos por observación directa y entrevistas, en dos períodos: agosto de 2016 y enero de 2017. Destacamos como principales resultados: la observación de cinco relaciones de intercambio entre los agentes internos y externos a la comunidad de Anã, que involucran varios tipos de "prestaciones", como define Mauss (1925/2017); la interpretación del turismo como una dádiva en ambientes sociales que promueve el intercambio de bienes y de su espiritualidad de forma ambivalente; la constatación de que la comunidad no posee autonomía sobre la gestión del turismo en su territorio. Consideramos que la experiencia de turismo desarrollada en Anã no alcanzó, aún, la condición requerida para ser considerada, de hecho, de base comunitaria. Este artigo objetiva mostrar que a experiência de turismo desenvolvida na comunidade de Anã/Santarém/Pará envolve várias relações de troca e reciprocidade, conforme a concepção de Mauss (1925/2017). Para esse autor, a dádiva é ambivalente, pois é simultaneamente, interessada e desinteressada, voluntária e obrigatória. O caráter ambivalente da dádiva foi compreendido pela noção de interesse postulada por Bourdieu (2011). A pesquisa de campo seguiu os pressupostos da pesquisa etnográfica antropológica, e o caminho metodológico foi construído a partir da concepção de Lanna (2000) sobre a “etnografia da troca”. Os dados foram coletados por observação direta e entrevistas, em dois períodos: agosto de 2016 e janeiro de 2017. Destacamos como principais resultados: a observação de cinco relações de troca entre os agentes internos e externos à comunidade de Anã, que envolvem vários tipos de “prestações”, como define Mauss (1925/2017); a interpretação do turismo como uma dádiva em ambientes sociais que ele promova a troca de bens e de sua espiritualidade de forma ambivalente; a constatação de que a comunidade não possui autonomia sobre a gestão do turismo em seu território. Consideramos que a experiência de turismo em Anã não alcançou, ainda, a condição requerida para ser considerada, de fato, de base comunitária. Anptur2019-05-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer reviewedEvaluado por paresAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://rbtur.org.br/rbtur/article/view/156810.7784/rbtur.v13i2.1568Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2019): maio/agosto; 144-160Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2019): maio/agosto; 144-160Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo; v. 13 n. 2 (2019): maio/agosto; 144-1601982-6125reponame:Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismoinstname:Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Turismo (ANPTUR)instacron:ANPPGTporenghttps://rbtur.org.br/rbtur/article/view/1568/1304https://rbtur.org.br/rbtur/article/view/1568/1305Copyright (c) 2019 giselle castro assis, Rodrigo Corrêa D. Peixotoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssis, Giselle CastroPeixoto, Rodrigo Corrêa D.2020-06-25T13:58:28Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1568Revistahttps://rbtur.org.br/rbturONGhttps://rbtur.org.br/rbtur/oai||edrbtur@gmail.com|| glauber.santos@usp.br1982-61251982-6125opendoar:2020-06-25T13:58:28Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo - Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Turismo (ANPTUR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tourism as a gift? An “ethnography of exchanges” and the offer of an alleged community-based tourism experience in Anã / Santarém / Pará ¿El turismo es un don? Una "etnografía de los cambios" y la oferta de la experiencia "llamada" Turismo de Base Comunitaria en Anã / Santarém / Pará O turismo é uma dádiva? Uma “etnografia das trocas” e a oferta da experiência “chamada” Turismo de Base Comunitária em Anã/Santarém/Pará |
title |
Tourism as a gift? An “ethnography of exchanges” and the offer of an alleged community-based tourism experience in Anã / Santarém / Pará |
spellingShingle |
Tourism as a gift? An “ethnography of exchanges” and the offer of an alleged community-based tourism experience in Anã / Santarém / Pará Assis, Giselle Castro Community-based tourism Gift Ethnography of the gift. Turismo de Base Comunitaria Don Etnografía del cambio. Turismo de Base Comunitária Dádiva Etnografia da troca. |
title_short |
Tourism as a gift? An “ethnography of exchanges” and the offer of an alleged community-based tourism experience in Anã / Santarém / Pará |
title_full |
Tourism as a gift? An “ethnography of exchanges” and the offer of an alleged community-based tourism experience in Anã / Santarém / Pará |
title_fullStr |
Tourism as a gift? An “ethnography of exchanges” and the offer of an alleged community-based tourism experience in Anã / Santarém / Pará |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tourism as a gift? An “ethnography of exchanges” and the offer of an alleged community-based tourism experience in Anã / Santarém / Pará |
title_sort |
Tourism as a gift? An “ethnography of exchanges” and the offer of an alleged community-based tourism experience in Anã / Santarém / Pará |
author |
Assis, Giselle Castro |
author_facet |
Assis, Giselle Castro Peixoto, Rodrigo Corrêa D. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Peixoto, Rodrigo Corrêa D. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Assis, Giselle Castro Peixoto, Rodrigo Corrêa D. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Community-based tourism Gift Ethnography of the gift. Turismo de Base Comunitaria Don Etnografía del cambio. Turismo de Base Comunitária Dádiva Etnografia da troca. |
topic |
Community-based tourism Gift Ethnography of the gift. Turismo de Base Comunitaria Don Etnografía del cambio. Turismo de Base Comunitária Dádiva Etnografia da troca. |
description |
This article intends to demonstrate that the experience of tourism carried out in the community of Anã/Santarém/Pará includes several relations of reciprocity, according to Mauss’ conception (1925/2017). For this author, the Gift is ambivalent, as it is simultaneously interested and disinterested, willingly offered and at the same time obligatory. The ambivalent character of the Gift was understood by means of the notion of interest, as established by Bourdieu (2011). The field work followed the assumptions of the ethnographic research, and the methodological path was built from the conception of Lanna (2000) about the “ethnography of the gift”. The data were collected through direct observation and interviews, in two periods: August of 2016 and January of 2017. We want to point out as main results: the observation of five reciprocity relations among the internal and external agents to the community of Anã, which involves many kind of “payments”, as Mauss defines it (1925/2017); the interpretation of tourism as a Gift in social environment in which the activity promotes the reciprocity of things and of its spiritual and symbolic meanings in an ambivalent way; the observation that the community does not hold autonomy to manage tourism in its territory. We consider that the experience of Anã did not amass, yet, the required elements to be regarded as a community-based tourism. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-05-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer reviewed Evaluado por pares Avaliado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rbtur.org.br/rbtur/article/view/1568 10.7784/rbtur.v13i2.1568 |
url |
https://rbtur.org.br/rbtur/article/view/1568 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.7784/rbtur.v13i2.1568 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rbtur.org.br/rbtur/article/view/1568/1304 https://rbtur.org.br/rbtur/article/view/1568/1305 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 giselle castro assis, Rodrigo Corrêa D. Peixoto info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 giselle castro assis, Rodrigo Corrêa D. Peixoto |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Anptur |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Anptur |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2019): maio/agosto; 144-160 Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2019): maio/agosto; 144-160 Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo; v. 13 n. 2 (2019): maio/agosto; 144-160 1982-6125 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo instname:Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Turismo (ANPTUR) instacron:ANPPGT |
instname_str |
Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Turismo (ANPTUR) |
instacron_str |
ANPPGT |
institution |
ANPPGT |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo - Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Turismo (ANPTUR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||edrbtur@gmail.com|| glauber.santos@usp.br |
_version_ |
1797675689128755200 |