Metropolitan ungovernability

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Compans, Rose
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais (Online)
Texto Completo: https://rbeur.anpur.org.br/rbeur/article/view/4991
Resumo: Although most of the population already live in metropolitan areas, in the Brazilian legal framework, there is still no appropriate legal ruling for managing these territories. The federal pact resulting from the Federal Constitution of 1988 established that it was at the prerogative of the states to create metropolitan regions, urban agglomerations and micro-regions, but did not attribute sufficient powers to them so they could conduct public functions of common interest (FPICs, in Portuguese), given the municipal autonomy likewise granted by the Constitution. In no other aspect does this legal conflict appear more evident than in territorial organization, since virtually all the instruments for the control of land use are of exclusively municipal competence. The purpose of this article is to discuss the possibilities of smoothing the way to an understanding on the limits of local autonomy in conurbations, thereby subordinating the “local” interest to the common interest, with regard to the regulating urban occupation. Therefore, we start with a brief analysis of the 1973 Law which set up the first metropolitan areas in Brazil, and thereby seek to identify advances and retrograde steps that the Constitution represented in relation to the division of powers between federal entities with respect to land management. Then, we investigate the role that post-1988 federal law reserves to metropolitan bodies in organizing, planning and carrying out FPICs in order to catch sight of windows of opportunity to bring them into force with regard to regulating the use of land. Finally, we discuss if the Statute of the Metropolis, which has recently been approved, provides the legal framework needed to overcome the antagonisms that criss-cross metropolitan governance. 
id ANPUR-1_5fa9a6298701557a3c1e61f19035cb2b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.rbeur.anpur.org.br:article/4991
network_acronym_str ANPUR-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Metropolitan ungovernabilityregulating land usegovernancemetropolitan areas.Although most of the population already live in metropolitan areas, in the Brazilian legal framework, there is still no appropriate legal ruling for managing these territories. The federal pact resulting from the Federal Constitution of 1988 established that it was at the prerogative of the states to create metropolitan regions, urban agglomerations and micro-regions, but did not attribute sufficient powers to them so they could conduct public functions of common interest (FPICs, in Portuguese), given the municipal autonomy likewise granted by the Constitution. In no other aspect does this legal conflict appear more evident than in territorial organization, since virtually all the instruments for the control of land use are of exclusively municipal competence. The purpose of this article is to discuss the possibilities of smoothing the way to an understanding on the limits of local autonomy in conurbations, thereby subordinating the “local” interest to the common interest, with regard to the regulating urban occupation. Therefore, we start with a brief analysis of the 1973 Law which set up the first metropolitan areas in Brazil, and thereby seek to identify advances and retrograde steps that the Constitution represented in relation to the division of powers between federal entities with respect to land management. Then, we investigate the role that post-1988 federal law reserves to metropolitan bodies in organizing, planning and carrying out FPICs in order to catch sight of windows of opportunity to bring them into force with regard to regulating the use of land. Finally, we discuss if the Statute of the Metropolis, which has recently been approved, provides the legal framework needed to overcome the antagonisms that criss-cross metropolitan governance. ANPUR2015-08-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rbeur.anpur.org.br/rbeur/article/view/499110.22296/2317-1529.2015v17n2p11Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2015): maio-agosto; 11Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais; v. 17 n. 2 (2015): maio-agosto; 112317-15291517-411510.22296/2317-1529.2015v17n2preponame:Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais (Online)instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-graduação e Pesquisa em Planejamento Urbano e Regional (ANPUR)instacron:ANPURporhttps://rbeur.anpur.org.br/rbeur/article/view/4991/4688Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionaishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCompans, Rose2017-10-02T13:02:12Zoai:ojs.rbeur.anpur.org.br:article/4991Revistahttps://rbeur.anpur.org.br/rbeurONGhttps://rbeur.anpur.org.br/rbeur/oairevista@anpur.org.br2317-15291517-4115opendoar:2017-10-02T13:02:12Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-graduação e Pesquisa em Planejamento Urbano e Regional (ANPUR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Metropolitan ungovernability
title Metropolitan ungovernability
spellingShingle Metropolitan ungovernability
Compans, Rose
regulating land use
governance
metropolitan areas.
title_short Metropolitan ungovernability
title_full Metropolitan ungovernability
title_fullStr Metropolitan ungovernability
title_full_unstemmed Metropolitan ungovernability
title_sort Metropolitan ungovernability
author Compans, Rose
author_facet Compans, Rose
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Compans, Rose
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv regulating land use
governance
metropolitan areas.
topic regulating land use
governance
metropolitan areas.
description Although most of the population already live in metropolitan areas, in the Brazilian legal framework, there is still no appropriate legal ruling for managing these territories. The federal pact resulting from the Federal Constitution of 1988 established that it was at the prerogative of the states to create metropolitan regions, urban agglomerations and micro-regions, but did not attribute sufficient powers to them so they could conduct public functions of common interest (FPICs, in Portuguese), given the municipal autonomy likewise granted by the Constitution. In no other aspect does this legal conflict appear more evident than in territorial organization, since virtually all the instruments for the control of land use are of exclusively municipal competence. The purpose of this article is to discuss the possibilities of smoothing the way to an understanding on the limits of local autonomy in conurbations, thereby subordinating the “local” interest to the common interest, with regard to the regulating urban occupation. Therefore, we start with a brief analysis of the 1973 Law which set up the first metropolitan areas in Brazil, and thereby seek to identify advances and retrograde steps that the Constitution represented in relation to the division of powers between federal entities with respect to land management. Then, we investigate the role that post-1988 federal law reserves to metropolitan bodies in organizing, planning and carrying out FPICs in order to catch sight of windows of opportunity to bring them into force with regard to regulating the use of land. Finally, we discuss if the Statute of the Metropolis, which has recently been approved, provides the legal framework needed to overcome the antagonisms that criss-cross metropolitan governance. 
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-08-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rbeur.anpur.org.br/rbeur/article/view/4991
10.22296/2317-1529.2015v17n2p11
url https://rbeur.anpur.org.br/rbeur/article/view/4991
identifier_str_mv 10.22296/2317-1529.2015v17n2p11
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rbeur.anpur.org.br/rbeur/article/view/4991/4688
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPUR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPUR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2015): maio-agosto; 11
Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais; v. 17 n. 2 (2015): maio-agosto; 11
2317-1529
1517-4115
10.22296/2317-1529.2015v17n2p
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais (Online)
instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-graduação e Pesquisa em Planejamento Urbano e Regional (ANPUR)
instacron:ANPUR
instname_str Associação Nacional de Pós-graduação e Pesquisa em Planejamento Urbano e Regional (ANPUR)
instacron_str ANPUR
institution ANPUR
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-graduação e Pesquisa em Planejamento Urbano e Regional (ANPUR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@anpur.org.br
_version_ 1797675720276705280