Stakeholder perceptions of offsite construction techniques: systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Senger,Eduardo Werneck
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Santos,Adriana de Paula Lacerda, Marques,Marcos Augusto Mendes, Scheer,Sérgio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ambiente construído (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-86212020000400347
Resumo: Abstract In the past few decades, a faster uptake has been noticed for offsite construction techniques, as supported by several relevant research streams. This study focused on the perceptions of stakeholders, which is an important research field, in terms of the manifold experiences and their critical role in decision-making. The purpose of this work was to gather quantifiable information regarding benefits and barriers of offsite construction to assist in the development or improvement of tools and strategic guidelines for the decision-making process. In total, 24 papers were selected by combining the systematic review with the snowball sampling technique to survey and quantify the perceptions of 1,625 stakeholders, and to obtain 238 barrier indexes and 99 benefit indexes. A hierarchical cluster analysis was also conducted to frame 10 clusters for benefits and another 10 for barriers. In addition, a co-citation analysis was carried out to identify 7 clusters and the associated connections between them. A database was provided with barriers and benefits, ranked by their relevance to offsite construction, as well as the bibliometrics and co-citation analysis that may help choose the best-fit source/perception for the purpose of the readers.
id ANTAC-1_3521d031800e7062d490e2f4cd5d9576
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1678-86212020000400347
network_acronym_str ANTAC-1
network_name_str Ambiente construído (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Stakeholder perceptions of offsite construction techniques: systematic reviewOffiste constructionStakeholder perceptionsBenefits and barriersSystematic reviewCo-citationAbstract In the past few decades, a faster uptake has been noticed for offsite construction techniques, as supported by several relevant research streams. This study focused on the perceptions of stakeholders, which is an important research field, in terms of the manifold experiences and their critical role in decision-making. The purpose of this work was to gather quantifiable information regarding benefits and barriers of offsite construction to assist in the development or improvement of tools and strategic guidelines for the decision-making process. In total, 24 papers were selected by combining the systematic review with the snowball sampling technique to survey and quantify the perceptions of 1,625 stakeholders, and to obtain 238 barrier indexes and 99 benefit indexes. A hierarchical cluster analysis was also conducted to frame 10 clusters for benefits and another 10 for barriers. In addition, a co-citation analysis was carried out to identify 7 clusters and the associated connections between them. A database was provided with barriers and benefits, ranked by their relevance to offsite construction, as well as the bibliometrics and co-citation analysis that may help choose the best-fit source/perception for the purpose of the readers.Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído - ANTAC2020-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-86212020000400347Ambiente Construído v.20 n.4 2020reponame:Ambiente construído (Online)instname:Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído (ANTAC)instacron:ANTAC10.1590/s1678-86212020000400477info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSenger,Eduardo WerneckSantos,Adriana de Paula LacerdaMarques,Marcos Augusto MendesScheer,Sérgioeng2020-10-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-86212020000400347Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/ambienteconstruidohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ambienteconstruido@ufrgs.br1678-86211415-8876opendoar:2020-10-26T00:00Ambiente construído (Online) - Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído (ANTAC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Stakeholder perceptions of offsite construction techniques: systematic review
title Stakeholder perceptions of offsite construction techniques: systematic review
spellingShingle Stakeholder perceptions of offsite construction techniques: systematic review
Senger,Eduardo Werneck
Offiste construction
Stakeholder perceptions
Benefits and barriers
Systematic review
Co-citation
title_short Stakeholder perceptions of offsite construction techniques: systematic review
title_full Stakeholder perceptions of offsite construction techniques: systematic review
title_fullStr Stakeholder perceptions of offsite construction techniques: systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholder perceptions of offsite construction techniques: systematic review
title_sort Stakeholder perceptions of offsite construction techniques: systematic review
author Senger,Eduardo Werneck
author_facet Senger,Eduardo Werneck
Santos,Adriana de Paula Lacerda
Marques,Marcos Augusto Mendes
Scheer,Sérgio
author_role author
author2 Santos,Adriana de Paula Lacerda
Marques,Marcos Augusto Mendes
Scheer,Sérgio
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Senger,Eduardo Werneck
Santos,Adriana de Paula Lacerda
Marques,Marcos Augusto Mendes
Scheer,Sérgio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Offiste construction
Stakeholder perceptions
Benefits and barriers
Systematic review
Co-citation
topic Offiste construction
Stakeholder perceptions
Benefits and barriers
Systematic review
Co-citation
description Abstract In the past few decades, a faster uptake has been noticed for offsite construction techniques, as supported by several relevant research streams. This study focused on the perceptions of stakeholders, which is an important research field, in terms of the manifold experiences and their critical role in decision-making. The purpose of this work was to gather quantifiable information regarding benefits and barriers of offsite construction to assist in the development or improvement of tools and strategic guidelines for the decision-making process. In total, 24 papers were selected by combining the systematic review with the snowball sampling technique to survey and quantify the perceptions of 1,625 stakeholders, and to obtain 238 barrier indexes and 99 benefit indexes. A hierarchical cluster analysis was also conducted to frame 10 clusters for benefits and another 10 for barriers. In addition, a co-citation analysis was carried out to identify 7 clusters and the associated connections between them. A database was provided with barriers and benefits, ranked by their relevance to offsite construction, as well as the bibliometrics and co-citation analysis that may help choose the best-fit source/perception for the purpose of the readers.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-86212020000400347
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-86212020000400347
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1678-86212020000400477
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído - ANTAC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído - ANTAC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ambiente Construído v.20 n.4 2020
reponame:Ambiente construído (Online)
instname:Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído (ANTAC)
instacron:ANTAC
instname_str Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído (ANTAC)
instacron_str ANTAC
institution ANTAC
reponame_str Ambiente construído (Online)
collection Ambiente construído (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ambiente construído (Online) - Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído (ANTAC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ambienteconstruido@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1754209104853729280