Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ambiente construído (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-86212016000300007 |
Resumo: | Abstract One of the main issues in urban sustainability and environmental assessment relates to the selection of indicators (SOCCO, 2000), as there are already many international and recognised core sets (DELSANTE, 2007; LEE; CHAN 2009). Nevertheless, specific local contexts are still in need of appropriate, original indicators and indices (MALCEVSCHI, 2004). This paper deals with the urban quality assessment of medium-density neighbourhoods, which typically include dwellings but also public functions, public spaces and urban infrastructure. The evaluation method is based on a set of 74 indicators used within a specific computational method that is based on scores and defined through pairwise comparison matrices (SOCCO, 2003) to convert qualitative and quantitative evaluations into scores (0 to +100). The assessment involved two different urban contexts in the cities of Lodi and Genoa (Italy). It tests if the set can be used in other sites and cities; the results show significant findings and potentialities, but also some limitations. As significant connections have already been found between urban quality and well-being surveys of inhabitants (ORLANDO, 2007), the possibility to act comparatively in different contexts increases overall research potentiality. |
id |
ANTAC-1_6c191b874cbcab2b340000f316054ae7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1678-86212016000300007 |
network_acronym_str |
ANTAC-1 |
network_name_str |
Ambiente construído (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and GenoaUrban quality assessmentNeighbourhood scaleQualitative and quantitative urban indicatorsMedium-density neighbourhoodsAbstract One of the main issues in urban sustainability and environmental assessment relates to the selection of indicators (SOCCO, 2000), as there are already many international and recognised core sets (DELSANTE, 2007; LEE; CHAN 2009). Nevertheless, specific local contexts are still in need of appropriate, original indicators and indices (MALCEVSCHI, 2004). This paper deals with the urban quality assessment of medium-density neighbourhoods, which typically include dwellings but also public functions, public spaces and urban infrastructure. The evaluation method is based on a set of 74 indicators used within a specific computational method that is based on scores and defined through pairwise comparison matrices (SOCCO, 2003) to convert qualitative and quantitative evaluations into scores (0 to +100). The assessment involved two different urban contexts in the cities of Lodi and Genoa (Italy). It tests if the set can be used in other sites and cities; the results show significant findings and potentialities, but also some limitations. As significant connections have already been found between urban quality and well-being surveys of inhabitants (ORLANDO, 2007), the possibility to act comparatively in different contexts increases overall research potentiality.Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído - ANTAC2016-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-86212016000300007Ambiente Construído v.16 n.3 2016reponame:Ambiente construído (Online)instname:Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído (ANTAC)instacron:ANTAC10.1590/s1678-86212016000300089info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDelsante,Ioannieng2016-06-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-86212016000300007Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/ambienteconstruidohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ambienteconstruido@ufrgs.br1678-86211415-8876opendoar:2016-06-27T00:00Ambiente construído (Online) - Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído (ANTAC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa |
title |
Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa |
spellingShingle |
Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa Delsante,Ioanni Urban quality assessment Neighbourhood scale Qualitative and quantitative urban indicators Medium-density neighbourhoods |
title_short |
Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa |
title_full |
Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa |
title_fullStr |
Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa |
title_sort |
Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa |
author |
Delsante,Ioanni |
author_facet |
Delsante,Ioanni |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Delsante,Ioanni |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Urban quality assessment Neighbourhood scale Qualitative and quantitative urban indicators Medium-density neighbourhoods |
topic |
Urban quality assessment Neighbourhood scale Qualitative and quantitative urban indicators Medium-density neighbourhoods |
description |
Abstract One of the main issues in urban sustainability and environmental assessment relates to the selection of indicators (SOCCO, 2000), as there are already many international and recognised core sets (DELSANTE, 2007; LEE; CHAN 2009). Nevertheless, specific local contexts are still in need of appropriate, original indicators and indices (MALCEVSCHI, 2004). This paper deals with the urban quality assessment of medium-density neighbourhoods, which typically include dwellings but also public functions, public spaces and urban infrastructure. The evaluation method is based on a set of 74 indicators used within a specific computational method that is based on scores and defined through pairwise comparison matrices (SOCCO, 2003) to convert qualitative and quantitative evaluations into scores (0 to +100). The assessment involved two different urban contexts in the cities of Lodi and Genoa (Italy). It tests if the set can be used in other sites and cities; the results show significant findings and potentialities, but also some limitations. As significant connections have already been found between urban quality and well-being surveys of inhabitants (ORLANDO, 2007), the possibility to act comparatively in different contexts increases overall research potentiality. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-86212016000300007 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-86212016000300007 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s1678-86212016000300089 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído - ANTAC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído - ANTAC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ambiente Construído v.16 n.3 2016 reponame:Ambiente construído (Online) instname:Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído (ANTAC) instacron:ANTAC |
instname_str |
Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído (ANTAC) |
instacron_str |
ANTAC |
institution |
ANTAC |
reponame_str |
Ambiente construído (Online) |
collection |
Ambiente construído (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ambiente construído (Online) - Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído (ANTAC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ambienteconstruido@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1754209103196979200 |