Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Iared,Wagner
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Shigueoka,David Carlos, Torloni,Maria Regina, Velloni,Fernanda Garozzo, Ajzen,Sérgio Aron, Atallah,Álvaro Nagib, Valente,Orsine
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802011000400009
Resumo: CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Mammography is the best method for breast-cancer screening and is capable of reducing mortality rates. Studies that have assessed the clinical impact of mammography have been carried out using film mammography. Digital mammography has been proposed as a substitute for film mammography given the benefits inherent to digital technology. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of digital and film mammography. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHOD: The Medline, Scopus, Embase and Lilacs databases were searched looking for paired studies, cohorts and randomized controlled trials published up to 2009 that compared the performance of digital and film mammography, with regard to cancer detection, recall rates and tumor characteristics. The reference lists of included studies were checked for any relevant citations. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies involving 190,322 digital and 638,348 film mammography images were included. The cancer detection rates were significantly higher for digital mammography than for film mammography (risk relative, RR = 1.17; 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.06-1.29; I² = 19%). The advantage of digital mammography seemed greatest among patients between 50 and 60 years of age. There were no significant differences between the two methods regarding patient recall rates or the characteristics of the tumors detected. CONCLUSION: The cancer detection rates using digital mammography are slightly higher than the rates using film mammography. There are no significant differences in recall rates between film and digital mammography. The characteristics of the tumors are similar in patients undergoing the two methods.
id APM-1_2df669873f98c118316d3b5dca1ad418
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802011000400009
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysisMammographyBreast neoplasmsMass screeningReview/Publication typeMeta-analysis/Publication typeCONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Mammography is the best method for breast-cancer screening and is capable of reducing mortality rates. Studies that have assessed the clinical impact of mammography have been carried out using film mammography. Digital mammography has been proposed as a substitute for film mammography given the benefits inherent to digital technology. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of digital and film mammography. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHOD: The Medline, Scopus, Embase and Lilacs databases were searched looking for paired studies, cohorts and randomized controlled trials published up to 2009 that compared the performance of digital and film mammography, with regard to cancer detection, recall rates and tumor characteristics. The reference lists of included studies were checked for any relevant citations. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies involving 190,322 digital and 638,348 film mammography images were included. The cancer detection rates were significantly higher for digital mammography than for film mammography (risk relative, RR = 1.17; 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.06-1.29; I² = 19%). The advantage of digital mammography seemed greatest among patients between 50 and 60 years of age. There were no significant differences between the two methods regarding patient recall rates or the characteristics of the tumors detected. CONCLUSION: The cancer detection rates using digital mammography are slightly higher than the rates using film mammography. There are no significant differences in recall rates between film and digital mammography. The characteristics of the tumors are similar in patients undergoing the two methods.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802011000400009Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.129 n.4 2011reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/S1516-31802011000400009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIared,WagnerShigueoka,David CarlosTorloni,Maria ReginaVelloni,Fernanda GarozzoAjzen,Sérgio AronAtallah,Álvaro NagibValente,Orsineeng2011-09-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802011000400009Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2011-09-21T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis
Iared,Wagner
Mammography
Breast neoplasms
Mass screening
Review/Publication type
Meta-analysis/Publication type
title_short Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis
author Iared,Wagner
author_facet Iared,Wagner
Shigueoka,David Carlos
Torloni,Maria Regina
Velloni,Fernanda Garozzo
Ajzen,Sérgio Aron
Atallah,Álvaro Nagib
Valente,Orsine
author_role author
author2 Shigueoka,David Carlos
Torloni,Maria Regina
Velloni,Fernanda Garozzo
Ajzen,Sérgio Aron
Atallah,Álvaro Nagib
Valente,Orsine
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Iared,Wagner
Shigueoka,David Carlos
Torloni,Maria Regina
Velloni,Fernanda Garozzo
Ajzen,Sérgio Aron
Atallah,Álvaro Nagib
Valente,Orsine
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mammography
Breast neoplasms
Mass screening
Review/Publication type
Meta-analysis/Publication type
topic Mammography
Breast neoplasms
Mass screening
Review/Publication type
Meta-analysis/Publication type
description CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Mammography is the best method for breast-cancer screening and is capable of reducing mortality rates. Studies that have assessed the clinical impact of mammography have been carried out using film mammography. Digital mammography has been proposed as a substitute for film mammography given the benefits inherent to digital technology. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of digital and film mammography. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHOD: The Medline, Scopus, Embase and Lilacs databases were searched looking for paired studies, cohorts and randomized controlled trials published up to 2009 that compared the performance of digital and film mammography, with regard to cancer detection, recall rates and tumor characteristics. The reference lists of included studies were checked for any relevant citations. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies involving 190,322 digital and 638,348 film mammography images were included. The cancer detection rates were significantly higher for digital mammography than for film mammography (risk relative, RR = 1.17; 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.06-1.29; I² = 19%). The advantage of digital mammography seemed greatest among patients between 50 and 60 years of age. There were no significant differences between the two methods regarding patient recall rates or the characteristics of the tumors detected. CONCLUSION: The cancer detection rates using digital mammography are slightly higher than the rates using film mammography. There are no significant differences in recall rates between film and digital mammography. The characteristics of the tumors are similar in patients undergoing the two methods.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802011000400009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802011000400009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-31802011000400009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.129 n.4 2011
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209263026176000