Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802011000400009 |
Resumo: | CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Mammography is the best method for breast-cancer screening and is capable of reducing mortality rates. Studies that have assessed the clinical impact of mammography have been carried out using film mammography. Digital mammography has been proposed as a substitute for film mammography given the benefits inherent to digital technology. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of digital and film mammography. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHOD: The Medline, Scopus, Embase and Lilacs databases were searched looking for paired studies, cohorts and randomized controlled trials published up to 2009 that compared the performance of digital and film mammography, with regard to cancer detection, recall rates and tumor characteristics. The reference lists of included studies were checked for any relevant citations. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies involving 190,322 digital and 638,348 film mammography images were included. The cancer detection rates were significantly higher for digital mammography than for film mammography (risk relative, RR = 1.17; 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.06-1.29; I² = 19%). The advantage of digital mammography seemed greatest among patients between 50 and 60 years of age. There were no significant differences between the two methods regarding patient recall rates or the characteristics of the tumors detected. CONCLUSION: The cancer detection rates using digital mammography are slightly higher than the rates using film mammography. There are no significant differences in recall rates between film and digital mammography. The characteristics of the tumors are similar in patients undergoing the two methods. |
id |
APM-1_2df669873f98c118316d3b5dca1ad418 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-31802011000400009 |
network_acronym_str |
APM-1 |
network_name_str |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysisMammographyBreast neoplasmsMass screeningReview/Publication typeMeta-analysis/Publication typeCONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Mammography is the best method for breast-cancer screening and is capable of reducing mortality rates. Studies that have assessed the clinical impact of mammography have been carried out using film mammography. Digital mammography has been proposed as a substitute for film mammography given the benefits inherent to digital technology. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of digital and film mammography. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHOD: The Medline, Scopus, Embase and Lilacs databases were searched looking for paired studies, cohorts and randomized controlled trials published up to 2009 that compared the performance of digital and film mammography, with regard to cancer detection, recall rates and tumor characteristics. The reference lists of included studies were checked for any relevant citations. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies involving 190,322 digital and 638,348 film mammography images were included. The cancer detection rates were significantly higher for digital mammography than for film mammography (risk relative, RR = 1.17; 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.06-1.29; I² = 19%). The advantage of digital mammography seemed greatest among patients between 50 and 60 years of age. There were no significant differences between the two methods regarding patient recall rates or the characteristics of the tumors detected. CONCLUSION: The cancer detection rates using digital mammography are slightly higher than the rates using film mammography. There are no significant differences in recall rates between film and digital mammography. The characteristics of the tumors are similar in patients undergoing the two methods.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802011000400009Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.129 n.4 2011reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/S1516-31802011000400009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIared,WagnerShigueoka,David CarlosTorloni,Maria ReginaVelloni,Fernanda GarozzoAjzen,Sérgio AronAtallah,Álvaro NagibValente,Orsineeng2011-09-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802011000400009Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2011-09-21T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis Iared,Wagner Mammography Breast neoplasms Mass screening Review/Publication type Meta-analysis/Publication type |
title_short |
Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Iared,Wagner |
author_facet |
Iared,Wagner Shigueoka,David Carlos Torloni,Maria Regina Velloni,Fernanda Garozzo Ajzen,Sérgio Aron Atallah,Álvaro Nagib Valente,Orsine |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Shigueoka,David Carlos Torloni,Maria Regina Velloni,Fernanda Garozzo Ajzen,Sérgio Aron Atallah,Álvaro Nagib Valente,Orsine |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Iared,Wagner Shigueoka,David Carlos Torloni,Maria Regina Velloni,Fernanda Garozzo Ajzen,Sérgio Aron Atallah,Álvaro Nagib Valente,Orsine |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mammography Breast neoplasms Mass screening Review/Publication type Meta-analysis/Publication type |
topic |
Mammography Breast neoplasms Mass screening Review/Publication type Meta-analysis/Publication type |
description |
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Mammography is the best method for breast-cancer screening and is capable of reducing mortality rates. Studies that have assessed the clinical impact of mammography have been carried out using film mammography. Digital mammography has been proposed as a substitute for film mammography given the benefits inherent to digital technology. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of digital and film mammography. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHOD: The Medline, Scopus, Embase and Lilacs databases were searched looking for paired studies, cohorts and randomized controlled trials published up to 2009 that compared the performance of digital and film mammography, with regard to cancer detection, recall rates and tumor characteristics. The reference lists of included studies were checked for any relevant citations. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies involving 190,322 digital and 638,348 film mammography images were included. The cancer detection rates were significantly higher for digital mammography than for film mammography (risk relative, RR = 1.17; 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.06-1.29; I² = 19%). The advantage of digital mammography seemed greatest among patients between 50 and 60 years of age. There were no significant differences between the two methods regarding patient recall rates or the characteristics of the tumors detected. CONCLUSION: The cancer detection rates using digital mammography are slightly higher than the rates using film mammography. There are no significant differences in recall rates between film and digital mammography. The characteristics of the tumors are similar in patients undergoing the two methods. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802011000400009 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802011000400009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1516-31802011000400009 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.129 n.4 2011 reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online) instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina instacron:APM |
instname_str |
Associação Paulista de Medicina |
instacron_str |
APM |
institution |
APM |
reponame_str |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
collection |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistas@apm.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209263026176000 |