What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802019000600530 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the third largest cause of blindness worldwide, accounting for 8.7% of all cases. A considerable number of preventive or therapeutic interventions have been used for AMD. OBJECTIVE: This study presents a critical view of the interventions that have been assessed through Cochrane systematic reviews. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: Review of Cochrane systematic reviews about interventions for AMD. RESULTS: The 18 systematic reviews included assessed the effects of surgical techniques, laser/photo/radiotherapy, intravitreal injections, systemic drugs and phytotherapy/vitamins/supplements. CONCLUSION: The Cochrane systematic reviews found evidence that use of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, pegaptanib, laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy and multivitamin compounds may present some benefits for treating AMD. There was insufficient evidence for supporting the use of macular translocation, submacular surgery, steroid implantation, radiotherapy, intravitreal aflibercept, interferon alfa, statins or omega-3 fatty acids for treating AMD; or the use of multivitamin antioxidant vitamins or mineral supplementation for preventing AMD. Future randomized controlled trials are imperative to reduce the uncertainty in several clinical questions regarding AMD. |
id |
APM-1_36f30a25293be738f6cb9358b34d70ba |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-31802019000600530 |
network_acronym_str |
APM-1 |
network_name_str |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration?Review [publication type]Macular degenerationMacular degeneration, age-related, 1 [supplementary concept]Evidence-based medicineEvidence-based practiceCochrane reviewsAge-related macular degenerationSystematic reviewsOverviewABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the third largest cause of blindness worldwide, accounting for 8.7% of all cases. A considerable number of preventive or therapeutic interventions have been used for AMD. OBJECTIVE: This study presents a critical view of the interventions that have been assessed through Cochrane systematic reviews. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: Review of Cochrane systematic reviews about interventions for AMD. RESULTS: The 18 systematic reviews included assessed the effects of surgical techniques, laser/photo/radiotherapy, intravitreal injections, systemic drugs and phytotherapy/vitamins/supplements. CONCLUSION: The Cochrane systematic reviews found evidence that use of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, pegaptanib, laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy and multivitamin compounds may present some benefits for treating AMD. There was insufficient evidence for supporting the use of macular translocation, submacular surgery, steroid implantation, radiotherapy, intravitreal aflibercept, interferon alfa, statins or omega-3 fatty acids for treating AMD; or the use of multivitamin antioxidant vitamins or mineral supplementation for preventing AMD. Future randomized controlled trials are imperative to reduce the uncertainty in several clinical questions regarding AMD.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2019-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802019000600530Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.137 n.6 2019reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/1516-3180.2019.010317092019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMozetic,VaniaPacheco,Rafael LeiteLatorraca,Carolina de Oliveira CruzLee,Fernanda Chin Yu OgasawaraGomes,João Victor BorgesRiera,Racheleng2020-03-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802019000600530Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2020-03-02T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration? |
title |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration? |
spellingShingle |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration? Mozetic,Vania Review [publication type] Macular degeneration Macular degeneration, age-related, 1 [supplementary concept] Evidence-based medicine Evidence-based practice Cochrane reviews Age-related macular degeneration Systematic reviews Overview |
title_short |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration? |
title_full |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration? |
title_fullStr |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration? |
title_full_unstemmed |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration? |
title_sort |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration? |
author |
Mozetic,Vania |
author_facet |
Mozetic,Vania Pacheco,Rafael Leite Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz Lee,Fernanda Chin Yu Ogasawara Gomes,João Victor Borges Riera,Rachel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pacheco,Rafael Leite Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz Lee,Fernanda Chin Yu Ogasawara Gomes,João Victor Borges Riera,Rachel |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mozetic,Vania Pacheco,Rafael Leite Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz Lee,Fernanda Chin Yu Ogasawara Gomes,João Victor Borges Riera,Rachel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Review [publication type] Macular degeneration Macular degeneration, age-related, 1 [supplementary concept] Evidence-based medicine Evidence-based practice Cochrane reviews Age-related macular degeneration Systematic reviews Overview |
topic |
Review [publication type] Macular degeneration Macular degeneration, age-related, 1 [supplementary concept] Evidence-based medicine Evidence-based practice Cochrane reviews Age-related macular degeneration Systematic reviews Overview |
description |
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the third largest cause of blindness worldwide, accounting for 8.7% of all cases. A considerable number of preventive or therapeutic interventions have been used for AMD. OBJECTIVE: This study presents a critical view of the interventions that have been assessed through Cochrane systematic reviews. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: Review of Cochrane systematic reviews about interventions for AMD. RESULTS: The 18 systematic reviews included assessed the effects of surgical techniques, laser/photo/radiotherapy, intravitreal injections, systemic drugs and phytotherapy/vitamins/supplements. CONCLUSION: The Cochrane systematic reviews found evidence that use of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, pegaptanib, laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy and multivitamin compounds may present some benefits for treating AMD. There was insufficient evidence for supporting the use of macular translocation, submacular surgery, steroid implantation, radiotherapy, intravitreal aflibercept, interferon alfa, statins or omega-3 fatty acids for treating AMD; or the use of multivitamin antioxidant vitamins or mineral supplementation for preventing AMD. Future randomized controlled trials are imperative to reduce the uncertainty in several clinical questions regarding AMD. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802019000600530 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802019000600530 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1516-3180.2019.010317092019 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.137 n.6 2019 reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online) instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina instacron:APM |
instname_str |
Associação Paulista de Medicina |
instacron_str |
APM |
institution |
APM |
reponame_str |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
collection |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistas@apm.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209266738135040 |