Assessment of functional capacity during gait using a reciprocal propulsion orthosis (ARGO): a comparative study with a conventional mechanical orthosis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Muszkat,Rachel
Data de Publicação: 1994
Outros Autores: Yazbek Jr.,Paulo, Arango,Claudia T., Moreira,Maria Cecilia, Trombetta,lvani C., Battistella,Linamara Rizzo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31801994000100004
Resumo: One subject (male, 24 years) with an incomplete motor and sensitive SCI, neurological level C6-C7 was submitted to a comparative study during gait using an advanced reciprocaiting gait othosis (ARGO) and a conventional mechanical orthosis (CMO) and respiratory and metabolic variables were compared at peak effort and in the second minute of recovery. We found that the ARGO, as with the CMO, not garantee gait independence but the ARGO does enable a more functional gait pattern with a more efficient ventilation . The ratio of CO2/O2 showed that ARGO enable aerobic conditions of work and the energy expenditure using is significantly lower than CMO.
id APM-1_5b648f781a329d86e55bab5a93a14c17
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31801994000100004
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Assessment of functional capacity during gait using a reciprocal propulsion orthosis (ARGO): a comparative study with a conventional mechanical orthosisSpinal cord injurySteeper advanced reciprocating gait orthosisConventional mechanical orthosisspiroergometerVO2maxanaerobic thresholdOne subject (male, 24 years) with an incomplete motor and sensitive SCI, neurological level C6-C7 was submitted to a comparative study during gait using an advanced reciprocaiting gait othosis (ARGO) and a conventional mechanical orthosis (CMO) and respiratory and metabolic variables were compared at peak effort and in the second minute of recovery. We found that the ARGO, as with the CMO, not garantee gait independence but the ARGO does enable a more functional gait pattern with a more efficient ventilation . The ratio of CO2/O2 showed that ARGO enable aerobic conditions of work and the energy expenditure using is significantly lower than CMO.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM1994-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31801994000100004Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.112 n.1 1994reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/S1516-31801994000100004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMuszkat,RachelYazbek Jr.,PauloArango,Claudia T.Moreira,Maria CeciliaTrombetta,lvani C.Battistella,Linamara Rizzoeng2009-07-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31801994000100004Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2009-07-03T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment of functional capacity during gait using a reciprocal propulsion orthosis (ARGO): a comparative study with a conventional mechanical orthosis
title Assessment of functional capacity during gait using a reciprocal propulsion orthosis (ARGO): a comparative study with a conventional mechanical orthosis
spellingShingle Assessment of functional capacity during gait using a reciprocal propulsion orthosis (ARGO): a comparative study with a conventional mechanical orthosis
Muszkat,Rachel
Spinal cord injury
Steeper advanced reciprocating gait orthosis
Conventional mechanical orthosis
spiroergometer
VO2max
anaerobic threshold
title_short Assessment of functional capacity during gait using a reciprocal propulsion orthosis (ARGO): a comparative study with a conventional mechanical orthosis
title_full Assessment of functional capacity during gait using a reciprocal propulsion orthosis (ARGO): a comparative study with a conventional mechanical orthosis
title_fullStr Assessment of functional capacity during gait using a reciprocal propulsion orthosis (ARGO): a comparative study with a conventional mechanical orthosis
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of functional capacity during gait using a reciprocal propulsion orthosis (ARGO): a comparative study with a conventional mechanical orthosis
title_sort Assessment of functional capacity during gait using a reciprocal propulsion orthosis (ARGO): a comparative study with a conventional mechanical orthosis
author Muszkat,Rachel
author_facet Muszkat,Rachel
Yazbek Jr.,Paulo
Arango,Claudia T.
Moreira,Maria Cecilia
Trombetta,lvani C.
Battistella,Linamara Rizzo
author_role author
author2 Yazbek Jr.,Paulo
Arango,Claudia T.
Moreira,Maria Cecilia
Trombetta,lvani C.
Battistella,Linamara Rizzo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Muszkat,Rachel
Yazbek Jr.,Paulo
Arango,Claudia T.
Moreira,Maria Cecilia
Trombetta,lvani C.
Battistella,Linamara Rizzo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Spinal cord injury
Steeper advanced reciprocating gait orthosis
Conventional mechanical orthosis
spiroergometer
VO2max
anaerobic threshold
topic Spinal cord injury
Steeper advanced reciprocating gait orthosis
Conventional mechanical orthosis
spiroergometer
VO2max
anaerobic threshold
description One subject (male, 24 years) with an incomplete motor and sensitive SCI, neurological level C6-C7 was submitted to a comparative study during gait using an advanced reciprocaiting gait othosis (ARGO) and a conventional mechanical orthosis (CMO) and respiratory and metabolic variables were compared at peak effort and in the second minute of recovery. We found that the ARGO, as with the CMO, not garantee gait independence but the ARGO does enable a more functional gait pattern with a more efficient ventilation . The ratio of CO2/O2 showed that ARGO enable aerobic conditions of work and the energy expenditure using is significantly lower than CMO.
publishDate 1994
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1994-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31801994000100004
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31801994000100004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-31801994000100004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.112 n.1 1994
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209259134910464

Registros relacionados