Measuring spirituality and religiosity in clinical research: a systematic review of instruments available in the Portuguese language

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lucchetti,Giancarlo
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Lucchetti,Alessandra Lamas Granero, Vallada,Homero
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802013000200112
Resumo: CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES Despite numerous spirituality and/or religiosity (S/R) measurement tools for use in research worldwide, there is little information on S/R instruments in the Portuguese language. The aim of the present study was to map out the S/R scales available for research in the Portuguese language. DESIGN AND SETTING Systematic review of studies found in databases. METHODS A systematic review was conducted in three phases. Phases 1 and 2: articles in Portuguese, Spanish and English, published up to November 2011, dealing with the Portuguese translation and/or validation of S/R measurement tools for clinical research, were selected from six databases. Phase 3: the instruments were grouped according to authorship, cross-cultural adaptation, internal consistency, concurrent and discriminative validity and test-retest procedures. RESULTS Twenty instruments were found. Forty-five percent of these evaluated religiosity, 40% spirituality, 10% religious/spiritual coping and 5% S/R. Among these, 90% had been produced in (n = 3) or translated to (n = 15) Brazilian Portuguese and two (10%) solely to European Portuguese. Nevertheless, the majority of the instruments had not undergone in-depth psychometric analysis. Only 40% of the instruments presented concurrent validity, 45% discriminative validity and 15% a test-retest procedure. The characteristics of each instrument were analyzed separately, yielding advantages, disadvantages and psychometric properties. CONCLUSION Currently, 20 instruments for measuring S/R are available in the Portuguese language. Most have been translated (n = 15) or developed (n = 3) in Brazil and present good internal consistency. Nevertheless, few instruments have been assessed regarding all their psychometric qualities.
id APM-1_70b2bd8269a36ee6ace97ddfe081b83d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802013000200112
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Measuring spirituality and religiosity in clinical research: a systematic review of instruments available in the Portuguese languageReligion and medicineSpiritualityPsychometricsReview [publication type]Medical history taking CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES Despite numerous spirituality and/or religiosity (S/R) measurement tools for use in research worldwide, there is little information on S/R instruments in the Portuguese language. The aim of the present study was to map out the S/R scales available for research in the Portuguese language. DESIGN AND SETTING Systematic review of studies found in databases. METHODS A systematic review was conducted in three phases. Phases 1 and 2: articles in Portuguese, Spanish and English, published up to November 2011, dealing with the Portuguese translation and/or validation of S/R measurement tools for clinical research, were selected from six databases. Phase 3: the instruments were grouped according to authorship, cross-cultural adaptation, internal consistency, concurrent and discriminative validity and test-retest procedures. RESULTS Twenty instruments were found. Forty-five percent of these evaluated religiosity, 40% spirituality, 10% religious/spiritual coping and 5% S/R. Among these, 90% had been produced in (n = 3) or translated to (n = 15) Brazilian Portuguese and two (10%) solely to European Portuguese. Nevertheless, the majority of the instruments had not undergone in-depth psychometric analysis. Only 40% of the instruments presented concurrent validity, 45% discriminative validity and 15% a test-retest procedure. The characteristics of each instrument were analyzed separately, yielding advantages, disadvantages and psychometric properties. CONCLUSION Currently, 20 instruments for measuring S/R are available in the Portuguese language. Most have been translated (n = 15) or developed (n = 3) in Brazil and present good internal consistency. Nevertheless, few instruments have been assessed regarding all their psychometric qualities. Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2013-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802013000200112Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.131 n.2 2013reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/S1516-31802013000100022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLucchetti,GiancarloLucchetti,Alessandra Lamas GraneroVallada,Homeroeng2013-04-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802013000200112Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2013-04-23T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Measuring spirituality and religiosity in clinical research: a systematic review of instruments available in the Portuguese language
title Measuring spirituality and religiosity in clinical research: a systematic review of instruments available in the Portuguese language
spellingShingle Measuring spirituality and religiosity in clinical research: a systematic review of instruments available in the Portuguese language
Lucchetti,Giancarlo
Religion and medicine
Spirituality
Psychometrics
Review [publication type]
Medical history taking
title_short Measuring spirituality and religiosity in clinical research: a systematic review of instruments available in the Portuguese language
title_full Measuring spirituality and religiosity in clinical research: a systematic review of instruments available in the Portuguese language
title_fullStr Measuring spirituality and religiosity in clinical research: a systematic review of instruments available in the Portuguese language
title_full_unstemmed Measuring spirituality and religiosity in clinical research: a systematic review of instruments available in the Portuguese language
title_sort Measuring spirituality and religiosity in clinical research: a systematic review of instruments available in the Portuguese language
author Lucchetti,Giancarlo
author_facet Lucchetti,Giancarlo
Lucchetti,Alessandra Lamas Granero
Vallada,Homero
author_role author
author2 Lucchetti,Alessandra Lamas Granero
Vallada,Homero
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lucchetti,Giancarlo
Lucchetti,Alessandra Lamas Granero
Vallada,Homero
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Religion and medicine
Spirituality
Psychometrics
Review [publication type]
Medical history taking
topic Religion and medicine
Spirituality
Psychometrics
Review [publication type]
Medical history taking
description CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES Despite numerous spirituality and/or religiosity (S/R) measurement tools for use in research worldwide, there is little information on S/R instruments in the Portuguese language. The aim of the present study was to map out the S/R scales available for research in the Portuguese language. DESIGN AND SETTING Systematic review of studies found in databases. METHODS A systematic review was conducted in three phases. Phases 1 and 2: articles in Portuguese, Spanish and English, published up to November 2011, dealing with the Portuguese translation and/or validation of S/R measurement tools for clinical research, were selected from six databases. Phase 3: the instruments were grouped according to authorship, cross-cultural adaptation, internal consistency, concurrent and discriminative validity and test-retest procedures. RESULTS Twenty instruments were found. Forty-five percent of these evaluated religiosity, 40% spirituality, 10% religious/spiritual coping and 5% S/R. Among these, 90% had been produced in (n = 3) or translated to (n = 15) Brazilian Portuguese and two (10%) solely to European Portuguese. Nevertheless, the majority of the instruments had not undergone in-depth psychometric analysis. Only 40% of the instruments presented concurrent validity, 45% discriminative validity and 15% a test-retest procedure. The characteristics of each instrument were analyzed separately, yielding advantages, disadvantages and psychometric properties. CONCLUSION Currently, 20 instruments for measuring S/R are available in the Portuguese language. Most have been translated (n = 15) or developed (n = 3) in Brazil and present good internal consistency. Nevertheless, few instruments have been assessed regarding all their psychometric qualities.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802013000200112
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802013000200112
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-31802013000100022
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.131 n.2 2013
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209263500132352