First-line biologic therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis: a prospective observational study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Michael Ruberson Ribeiro da
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Santos,Jéssica Barreto Ribeiro dos, Kakehasi,Adriana Maria, Almeida,Alessandra Maciel, Pimenta,Pedro Ricardo Kömel, Alvares-Teodoro,Juliana, Acurcio,Francisco de Assis
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802022000600787
Resumo: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects multiple joints. It is associated with psoriasis and treated with synthetic and biologic drugs. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients who received biologic therapy with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in terms of effectiveness, safety, functionality, and quality of life. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective observational study was performed at a single center in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. METHODS: Patients with PsA who received their first TNF inhibitor treatment were followed up for 12 months. Disease activity was measured using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). Functionality was measured using the Health Questionnaire Assessment (HAQ), and quality of life was evaluated using the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions (EQ-5D). Multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of the clinical response at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients treated with adalimumab or etanercept were evaluated. Most of the clinical measures were significantly improved at 12 months. However, 31%–51% of the patients did not achieve good clinical control. No differences were observed between adalimumab and etanercept, except for poor functionality at 12 months among patients treated with etanercept. The main predictors of a worse clinical response were female sex, etanercept use, poor functionality, or lower quality of life at baseline. The main adverse reactions were alopecia, headache, injection site reaction, sinusitis, flu, dyslipidemia, and infections. CONCLUSION: TNF inhibitor therapy was effective and safe. However, despite improvements in clinical measures, most patients did not achieve satisfactory control of the disease.
id APM-1_7570866b830012ea0eba9f1d27bbce8a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802022000600787
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling First-line biologic therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis: a prospective observational studyArthritis, psoriaticComparative effectiveness researchAdalimumabEtanerceptObservational study [publication type]Minimal clinically important differenceSpondylarthritisTNF inhibitorsGood clinical responseQuality of lifeSafetyABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects multiple joints. It is associated with psoriasis and treated with synthetic and biologic drugs. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients who received biologic therapy with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in terms of effectiveness, safety, functionality, and quality of life. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective observational study was performed at a single center in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. METHODS: Patients with PsA who received their first TNF inhibitor treatment were followed up for 12 months. Disease activity was measured using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). Functionality was measured using the Health Questionnaire Assessment (HAQ), and quality of life was evaluated using the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions (EQ-5D). Multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of the clinical response at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients treated with adalimumab or etanercept were evaluated. Most of the clinical measures were significantly improved at 12 months. However, 31%–51% of the patients did not achieve good clinical control. No differences were observed between adalimumab and etanercept, except for poor functionality at 12 months among patients treated with etanercept. The main predictors of a worse clinical response were female sex, etanercept use, poor functionality, or lower quality of life at baseline. The main adverse reactions were alopecia, headache, injection site reaction, sinusitis, flu, dyslipidemia, and infections. CONCLUSION: TNF inhibitor therapy was effective and safe. However, despite improvements in clinical measures, most patients did not achieve satisfactory control of the disease.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2022-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802022000600787Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.140 n.6 2022reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0434.r1.22022022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Michael Ruberson Ribeiro daSantos,Jéssica Barreto Ribeiro dosKakehasi,Adriana MariaAlmeida,Alessandra MacielPimenta,Pedro Ricardo KömelAlvares-Teodoro,JulianaAcurcio,Francisco de Assiseng2022-10-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802022000600787Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2022-10-27T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv First-line biologic therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis: a prospective observational study
title First-line biologic therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis: a prospective observational study
spellingShingle First-line biologic therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis: a prospective observational study
Silva,Michael Ruberson Ribeiro da
Arthritis, psoriatic
Comparative effectiveness research
Adalimumab
Etanercept
Observational study [publication type]
Minimal clinically important difference
Spondylarthritis
TNF inhibitors
Good clinical response
Quality of life
Safety
title_short First-line biologic therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis: a prospective observational study
title_full First-line biologic therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis: a prospective observational study
title_fullStr First-line biologic therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis: a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed First-line biologic therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis: a prospective observational study
title_sort First-line biologic therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis: a prospective observational study
author Silva,Michael Ruberson Ribeiro da
author_facet Silva,Michael Ruberson Ribeiro da
Santos,Jéssica Barreto Ribeiro dos
Kakehasi,Adriana Maria
Almeida,Alessandra Maciel
Pimenta,Pedro Ricardo Kömel
Alvares-Teodoro,Juliana
Acurcio,Francisco de Assis
author_role author
author2 Santos,Jéssica Barreto Ribeiro dos
Kakehasi,Adriana Maria
Almeida,Alessandra Maciel
Pimenta,Pedro Ricardo Kömel
Alvares-Teodoro,Juliana
Acurcio,Francisco de Assis
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Michael Ruberson Ribeiro da
Santos,Jéssica Barreto Ribeiro dos
Kakehasi,Adriana Maria
Almeida,Alessandra Maciel
Pimenta,Pedro Ricardo Kömel
Alvares-Teodoro,Juliana
Acurcio,Francisco de Assis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arthritis, psoriatic
Comparative effectiveness research
Adalimumab
Etanercept
Observational study [publication type]
Minimal clinically important difference
Spondylarthritis
TNF inhibitors
Good clinical response
Quality of life
Safety
topic Arthritis, psoriatic
Comparative effectiveness research
Adalimumab
Etanercept
Observational study [publication type]
Minimal clinically important difference
Spondylarthritis
TNF inhibitors
Good clinical response
Quality of life
Safety
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects multiple joints. It is associated with psoriasis and treated with synthetic and biologic drugs. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients who received biologic therapy with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in terms of effectiveness, safety, functionality, and quality of life. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective observational study was performed at a single center in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. METHODS: Patients with PsA who received their first TNF inhibitor treatment were followed up for 12 months. Disease activity was measured using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). Functionality was measured using the Health Questionnaire Assessment (HAQ), and quality of life was evaluated using the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions (EQ-5D). Multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of the clinical response at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients treated with adalimumab or etanercept were evaluated. Most of the clinical measures were significantly improved at 12 months. However, 31%–51% of the patients did not achieve good clinical control. No differences were observed between adalimumab and etanercept, except for poor functionality at 12 months among patients treated with etanercept. The main predictors of a worse clinical response were female sex, etanercept use, poor functionality, or lower quality of life at baseline. The main adverse reactions were alopecia, headache, injection site reaction, sinusitis, flu, dyslipidemia, and infections. CONCLUSION: TNF inhibitor therapy was effective and safe. However, despite improvements in clinical measures, most patients did not achieve satisfactory control of the disease.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802022000600787
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802022000600787
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0434.r1.22022022
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.140 n.6 2022
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209268996767744