Perineal trauma after vaginal delivery in healthy pregnant women
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1227 |
Resumo: | CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Despite all the medical care provided during delivery labor, perineal injury is still prevalent and may lead to diverse pelvic floor disorders. The aim here was to investigate the prevalence of obstetric and anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in healthy pregnant women after vaginal delivery. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study involving 3,034 patients with singletons in a secondary hospital for low-risk cases. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was prepared and applied to medical files that had been completely filled out (classification of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, RCOG) in order to identify OASIS and analyze risk factors associated with mild and severe perineal lacerations. RESULTS: The women’s mean age was 25 years; more than half (54.4%) were primiparae. Almost 38% of the participants had perineal lacerations; these were severe in 0.9% of the cases. Previous vaginal delivery (odds ratio, OR: 1.64 [1.33-2.04]) and forceps delivery (OR: 2.04 [1.39-2.97]) were risk factors associated with mild perineal injuries (1st and 2nd OASIS classifications). Only remaining standing for prolonged periods during professional activity (OR: 2.85 [1.34-6.09]) was associated with severe perineal injuries. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of severe perineal injuries was concordant with data in the literature. The variable of standing position was considered to be a risk factor for severe perineal injury and should be further investigated. |
id |
APM-1_d2c4127b6854b55321e7ca55e3d39893 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.diagnosticoetratamento.emnuvens.com.br:article/1227 |
network_acronym_str |
APM-1 |
network_name_str |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Perineal trauma after vaginal delivery in healthy pregnant womenTrauma perineal após parto vaginal em parturientes saudáveisLaceraçõesSegunda fase do trabalho de partoEquilíbrio posturalEpisiotomiaForceps obstétricoLacerationsLabor stage, secondPostural balanceEpisiotomyObstetrical forcepsCONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Despite all the medical care provided during delivery labor, perineal injury is still prevalent and may lead to diverse pelvic floor disorders. The aim here was to investigate the prevalence of obstetric and anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in healthy pregnant women after vaginal delivery. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study involving 3,034 patients with singletons in a secondary hospital for low-risk cases. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was prepared and applied to medical files that had been completely filled out (classification of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, RCOG) in order to identify OASIS and analyze risk factors associated with mild and severe perineal lacerations. RESULTS: The women’s mean age was 25 years; more than half (54.4%) were primiparae. Almost 38% of the participants had perineal lacerations; these were severe in 0.9% of the cases. Previous vaginal delivery (odds ratio, OR: 1.64 [1.33-2.04]) and forceps delivery (OR: 2.04 [1.39-2.97]) were risk factors associated with mild perineal injuries (1st and 2nd OASIS classifications). Only remaining standing for prolonged periods during professional activity (OR: 2.85 [1.34-6.09]) was associated with severe perineal injuries. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of severe perineal injuries was concordant with data in the literature. The variable of standing position was considered to be a risk factor for severe perineal injury and should be further investigated.CONTEXTO E OBJETIVOS: Apesar do cuidado médico executado durante o trabalho de parto, os traumas perineais ainda são prevalentes e podem levar a várias desordens do assoalho pélvico. O objetivo foi investigar a prevalência de injúrias obstétricas e do esfíncter anal em mulheres saudáveis após parto vaginal. DESENHO E LOCAL DE ESTUDO: Estudo transversal envolvendo 3.034 pacientes com recém-natos únicos de um hospital secundário de baixo risco. MÉTODOS: Um questionário padronizado foi preparado e aplicado aos prontuários completamente preenchidos (classificação do Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) para identificar as lesões obstétricas e do esfíncter anal e analisar fatores de risco associados com lacerações perineais leves e graves. RESULTADOS: A média de idade das mulheres era 25 anos; mais da metade (54,4%) era primípara. Quase 38% das participantes tiveram lacerações perineais; estas foram graves em 0,9% dos casos. A presença de parto vaginal prévio (odds ratio, OR, 1,64 [1,33-2,04]) e o parto fórceps (OR 2,04 [1,39-2,97]) foram fatores de risco associados às lesões perineais leves (primeira e segunda classificações de lesão esfíncter e anal). Somente a posição em pé prolongada durante a atividade profissional (OR 2,85 [1,34-6,09]) estava associada com lesões perineais graves. CONCLUSÃO: A prevalência de trauma perineal grave concordou com dados da literatura. A variável posição em pé foi considerada fator de risco para trauma perineal grave e necessita ser investigada.São Paulo Medical JournalSão Paulo Medical Journal2014-08-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1227São Paulo Medical Journal; Vol. 132 No. 4 (2014); 231-238São Paulo Medical Journal; v. 132 n. 4 (2014); 231-2381806-9460reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APMenghttps://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1227/1146https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Larissa SantosBrito, Luiz Gustavo OliveiraQuintana, Silvana MariaDuarte, GeraldoMarcolin, Alessandra Cristina2023-08-26T13:17:43Zoai:ojs.diagnosticoetratamento.emnuvens.com.br:article/1227Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2023-08-26T13:17:43São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Perineal trauma after vaginal delivery in healthy pregnant women Trauma perineal após parto vaginal em parturientes saudáveis |
title |
Perineal trauma after vaginal delivery in healthy pregnant women |
spellingShingle |
Perineal trauma after vaginal delivery in healthy pregnant women Oliveira, Larissa Santos Lacerações Segunda fase do trabalho de parto Equilíbrio postural Episiotomia Forceps obstétrico Lacerations Labor stage, second Postural balance Episiotomy Obstetrical forceps |
title_short |
Perineal trauma after vaginal delivery in healthy pregnant women |
title_full |
Perineal trauma after vaginal delivery in healthy pregnant women |
title_fullStr |
Perineal trauma after vaginal delivery in healthy pregnant women |
title_full_unstemmed |
Perineal trauma after vaginal delivery in healthy pregnant women |
title_sort |
Perineal trauma after vaginal delivery in healthy pregnant women |
author |
Oliveira, Larissa Santos |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Larissa Santos Brito, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Quintana, Silvana Maria Duarte, Geraldo Marcolin, Alessandra Cristina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Brito, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Quintana, Silvana Maria Duarte, Geraldo Marcolin, Alessandra Cristina |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Larissa Santos Brito, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Quintana, Silvana Maria Duarte, Geraldo Marcolin, Alessandra Cristina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Lacerações Segunda fase do trabalho de parto Equilíbrio postural Episiotomia Forceps obstétrico Lacerations Labor stage, second Postural balance Episiotomy Obstetrical forceps |
topic |
Lacerações Segunda fase do trabalho de parto Equilíbrio postural Episiotomia Forceps obstétrico Lacerations Labor stage, second Postural balance Episiotomy Obstetrical forceps |
description |
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Despite all the medical care provided during delivery labor, perineal injury is still prevalent and may lead to diverse pelvic floor disorders. The aim here was to investigate the prevalence of obstetric and anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in healthy pregnant women after vaginal delivery. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study involving 3,034 patients with singletons in a secondary hospital for low-risk cases. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was prepared and applied to medical files that had been completely filled out (classification of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, RCOG) in order to identify OASIS and analyze risk factors associated with mild and severe perineal lacerations. RESULTS: The women’s mean age was 25 years; more than half (54.4%) were primiparae. Almost 38% of the participants had perineal lacerations; these were severe in 0.9% of the cases. Previous vaginal delivery (odds ratio, OR: 1.64 [1.33-2.04]) and forceps delivery (OR: 2.04 [1.39-2.97]) were risk factors associated with mild perineal injuries (1st and 2nd OASIS classifications). Only remaining standing for prolonged periods during professional activity (OR: 2.85 [1.34-6.09]) was associated with severe perineal injuries. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of severe perineal injuries was concordant with data in the literature. The variable of standing position was considered to be a risk factor for severe perineal injury and should be further investigated. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-08-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1227 |
url |
https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1227 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1227/1146 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo Medical Journal São Paulo Medical Journal |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo Medical Journal São Paulo Medical Journal |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo Medical Journal; Vol. 132 No. 4 (2014); 231-238 São Paulo Medical Journal; v. 132 n. 4 (2014); 231-238 1806-9460 reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online) instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina instacron:APM |
instname_str |
Associação Paulista de Medicina |
instacron_str |
APM |
institution |
APM |
reponame_str |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
collection |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistas@apm.org.br |
_version_ |
1825135062750855168 |