Accuracy of praxis test from Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) for Alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cecato,Juliana Francisca
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Melo,Brian Alvarez Ribeiro de, Moraes,Gisele Correa de, Martinelli,José Eduardo, Montiel,José Maria
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000500390
Resumo: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Praxis impairment may be one of the first symptoms manifested in dementia, primarily in cortical dementia. The Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) evaluates praxis, but little is known about the accuracy of CAMCOG for diagnosing dementia. The aims here were to investigate the accuracy of praxis and its subitems in CAMCOG (constructive, ideomotor and ideational subitems) for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) among elderly patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study on community-dwelling elderly people. METHODS: 158 elderly patients were evaluated. CAMCOG, Mini-Mental State Examination and Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire were used. ROC curve analysis was used to establish cutoff points. RESULTS: The total scores for praxis and the constructive subitem presented significant differences (P < 0.0001) between healthy elderly people and AD patients. Stage of dementia (clinical dementia rating, CDR = 0, 1 and 2) showed that total and constructive praxis can be used to classify the stages of dementia (mild and moderate cases), i.e. constructive praxis classified 88% of the patients with mild dementia (P < 0.0001) while total praxis classified 56% with moderate dementia. Comparison of normal controls (NC) and mild dementia cases showed specificity of 71% and sensitivity of 88% (AUC = 0.88; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Some praxis subtests can have higher predictive diagnostic value for detecting Alzheimer’s disease in mild stages (total praxis AUC = 0.858; P < 0.0001; constructive AUC = 0.972; P < 0.0001). Constructive praxis as measured using CAMCOG may contribute towards diagnosing dementia, because occurrence of impairment of praxis may help in recognizing an evolving dementia syndrome.
id APM-1_894d1741c58f120cb593dd83354526ef
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802018000500390
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Accuracy of praxis test from Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) for Alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional studyDementiaApraxiasDiagnosis, differentialAgedMental status and dementia testsABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Praxis impairment may be one of the first symptoms manifested in dementia, primarily in cortical dementia. The Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) evaluates praxis, but little is known about the accuracy of CAMCOG for diagnosing dementia. The aims here were to investigate the accuracy of praxis and its subitems in CAMCOG (constructive, ideomotor and ideational subitems) for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) among elderly patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study on community-dwelling elderly people. METHODS: 158 elderly patients were evaluated. CAMCOG, Mini-Mental State Examination and Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire were used. ROC curve analysis was used to establish cutoff points. RESULTS: The total scores for praxis and the constructive subitem presented significant differences (P < 0.0001) between healthy elderly people and AD patients. Stage of dementia (clinical dementia rating, CDR = 0, 1 and 2) showed that total and constructive praxis can be used to classify the stages of dementia (mild and moderate cases), i.e. constructive praxis classified 88% of the patients with mild dementia (P < 0.0001) while total praxis classified 56% with moderate dementia. Comparison of normal controls (NC) and mild dementia cases showed specificity of 71% and sensitivity of 88% (AUC = 0.88; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Some praxis subtests can have higher predictive diagnostic value for detecting Alzheimer’s disease in mild stages (total praxis AUC = 0.858; P < 0.0001; constructive AUC = 0.972; P < 0.0001). Constructive praxis as measured using CAMCOG may contribute towards diagnosing dementia, because occurrence of impairment of praxis may help in recognizing an evolving dementia syndrome.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2018-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000500390Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.136 n.5 2018reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0022170418info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCecato,Juliana FranciscaMelo,Brian Alvarez Ribeiro deMoraes,Gisele Correa deMartinelli,José EduardoMontiel,José Mariaeng2018-12-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802018000500390Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2018-12-17T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Accuracy of praxis test from Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) for Alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional study
title Accuracy of praxis test from Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) for Alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional study
spellingShingle Accuracy of praxis test from Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) for Alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional study
Cecato,Juliana Francisca
Dementia
Apraxias
Diagnosis, differential
Aged
Mental status and dementia tests
title_short Accuracy of praxis test from Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) for Alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional study
title_full Accuracy of praxis test from Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) for Alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Accuracy of praxis test from Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) for Alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of praxis test from Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) for Alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional study
title_sort Accuracy of praxis test from Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) for Alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional study
author Cecato,Juliana Francisca
author_facet Cecato,Juliana Francisca
Melo,Brian Alvarez Ribeiro de
Moraes,Gisele Correa de
Martinelli,José Eduardo
Montiel,José Maria
author_role author
author2 Melo,Brian Alvarez Ribeiro de
Moraes,Gisele Correa de
Martinelli,José Eduardo
Montiel,José Maria
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cecato,Juliana Francisca
Melo,Brian Alvarez Ribeiro de
Moraes,Gisele Correa de
Martinelli,José Eduardo
Montiel,José Maria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dementia
Apraxias
Diagnosis, differential
Aged
Mental status and dementia tests
topic Dementia
Apraxias
Diagnosis, differential
Aged
Mental status and dementia tests
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Praxis impairment may be one of the first symptoms manifested in dementia, primarily in cortical dementia. The Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) evaluates praxis, but little is known about the accuracy of CAMCOG for diagnosing dementia. The aims here were to investigate the accuracy of praxis and its subitems in CAMCOG (constructive, ideomotor and ideational subitems) for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) among elderly patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study on community-dwelling elderly people. METHODS: 158 elderly patients were evaluated. CAMCOG, Mini-Mental State Examination and Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire were used. ROC curve analysis was used to establish cutoff points. RESULTS: The total scores for praxis and the constructive subitem presented significant differences (P < 0.0001) between healthy elderly people and AD patients. Stage of dementia (clinical dementia rating, CDR = 0, 1 and 2) showed that total and constructive praxis can be used to classify the stages of dementia (mild and moderate cases), i.e. constructive praxis classified 88% of the patients with mild dementia (P < 0.0001) while total praxis classified 56% with moderate dementia. Comparison of normal controls (NC) and mild dementia cases showed specificity of 71% and sensitivity of 88% (AUC = 0.88; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Some praxis subtests can have higher predictive diagnostic value for detecting Alzheimer’s disease in mild stages (total praxis AUC = 0.858; P < 0.0001; constructive AUC = 0.972; P < 0.0001). Constructive praxis as measured using CAMCOG may contribute towards diagnosing dementia, because occurrence of impairment of praxis may help in recognizing an evolving dementia syndrome.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000500390
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000500390
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0022170418
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.136 n.5 2018
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209266198118400