Practical and conceptual issues of clinical trial registration for Brazilian researchers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Freitas,Carolina Gomes
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Pesavento,Thomas Fernando Coelho, Pedrosa,Maurício Reis, Riera,Rachel, Torloni,Maria Regina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802016000100028
Resumo: CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Clinical trial registration is a prerequisite for publication in respected scientific journals. Recent Brazilian regulations also require registration of some clinical trials in the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBEC) but there is little information available about practical issues involved in the registration process. This article discusses the importance of clinical trial registration and the practical issues involved in this process. DESIGN AND SETTING: Descriptive study conducted by researchers within a postgraduate program at a public university in São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: Information was obtained from clinical trial registry platforms, article reference lists and websites (last search: September 2014) on the following topics: definition of a clinical trial, history, purpose and importance of registry platforms, the information that should be registered and the registration process. RESULTS: Clinical trial registration aims to avoid publication bias and is required by Brazilian journals indexed in LILACS and SciELO and by journals affiliated to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Recent Brazilian regulations require that all clinical trials (phases I to IV) involving new drugs to be marketed in this country must be registered in ReBEC. The pros and cons of using different clinical trial registration platforms are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trial registration is important and various mechanisms to enforce its implementation now exist. Researchers should take into account national regulations and publication requirements when choosing the platform on which they will register their trial.
id APM-1_c21bdb450e2143b644da0d5b81e846b4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802016000100028
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Practical and conceptual issues of clinical trial registration for Brazilian researchersClinical trials as topicDatabase [publication type]Information systemsPublication biasBrazil CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Clinical trial registration is a prerequisite for publication in respected scientific journals. Recent Brazilian regulations also require registration of some clinical trials in the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBEC) but there is little information available about practical issues involved in the registration process. This article discusses the importance of clinical trial registration and the practical issues involved in this process. DESIGN AND SETTING: Descriptive study conducted by researchers within a postgraduate program at a public university in São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: Information was obtained from clinical trial registry platforms, article reference lists and websites (last search: September 2014) on the following topics: definition of a clinical trial, history, purpose and importance of registry platforms, the information that should be registered and the registration process. RESULTS: Clinical trial registration aims to avoid publication bias and is required by Brazilian journals indexed in LILACS and SciELO and by journals affiliated to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Recent Brazilian regulations require that all clinical trials (phases I to IV) involving new drugs to be marketed in this country must be registered in ReBEC. The pros and cons of using different clinical trial registration platforms are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trial registration is important and various mechanisms to enforce its implementation now exist. Researchers should take into account national regulations and publication requirements when choosing the platform on which they will register their trial.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2016-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802016000100028Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.134 n.1 2016reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/1516-3180.2014.00441803info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFreitas,Carolina GomesPesavento,Thomas Fernando CoelhoPedrosa,Maurício ReisRiera,RachelTorloni,Maria Reginaeng2016-09-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802016000100028Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2016-09-13T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Practical and conceptual issues of clinical trial registration for Brazilian researchers
title Practical and conceptual issues of clinical trial registration for Brazilian researchers
spellingShingle Practical and conceptual issues of clinical trial registration for Brazilian researchers
Freitas,Carolina Gomes
Clinical trials as topic
Database [publication type]
Information systems
Publication bias
Brazil
title_short Practical and conceptual issues of clinical trial registration for Brazilian researchers
title_full Practical and conceptual issues of clinical trial registration for Brazilian researchers
title_fullStr Practical and conceptual issues of clinical trial registration for Brazilian researchers
title_full_unstemmed Practical and conceptual issues of clinical trial registration for Brazilian researchers
title_sort Practical and conceptual issues of clinical trial registration for Brazilian researchers
author Freitas,Carolina Gomes
author_facet Freitas,Carolina Gomes
Pesavento,Thomas Fernando Coelho
Pedrosa,Maurício Reis
Riera,Rachel
Torloni,Maria Regina
author_role author
author2 Pesavento,Thomas Fernando Coelho
Pedrosa,Maurício Reis
Riera,Rachel
Torloni,Maria Regina
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Freitas,Carolina Gomes
Pesavento,Thomas Fernando Coelho
Pedrosa,Maurício Reis
Riera,Rachel
Torloni,Maria Regina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Clinical trials as topic
Database [publication type]
Information systems
Publication bias
Brazil
topic Clinical trials as topic
Database [publication type]
Information systems
Publication bias
Brazil
description CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Clinical trial registration is a prerequisite for publication in respected scientific journals. Recent Brazilian regulations also require registration of some clinical trials in the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBEC) but there is little information available about practical issues involved in the registration process. This article discusses the importance of clinical trial registration and the practical issues involved in this process. DESIGN AND SETTING: Descriptive study conducted by researchers within a postgraduate program at a public university in São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: Information was obtained from clinical trial registry platforms, article reference lists and websites (last search: September 2014) on the following topics: definition of a clinical trial, history, purpose and importance of registry platforms, the information that should be registered and the registration process. RESULTS: Clinical trial registration aims to avoid publication bias and is required by Brazilian journals indexed in LILACS and SciELO and by journals affiliated to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Recent Brazilian regulations require that all clinical trials (phases I to IV) involving new drugs to be marketed in this country must be registered in ReBEC. The pros and cons of using different clinical trial registration platforms are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trial registration is important and various mechanisms to enforce its implementation now exist. Researchers should take into account national regulations and publication requirements when choosing the platform on which they will register their trial.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802016000100028
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802016000100028
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-3180.2014.00441803
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.134 n.1 2016
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209264776249344