What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about the management of irritable bowel syndrome?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pacheco,Rafael Leite
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Roizenblatt,Arnaldo, Góis,Aécio Flávio Teixeira de, Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz, Mota,Carolina Frade Magalhães Girardin Pimentel, Riera,Rachel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802019000100082
Resumo: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a clinical disorder associated with high socioeconomic burden. Despite its importance, management of IBS remains difficult and several interventions have been hypothesized as beneficial for this condition. This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) about the effects of interventions for managing IBS patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, carried out in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: Review of Cochrane SRs addressing interventions for IBS. RESULTS: We included six SRs assessing acupuncture, bulking agents, antispasmodics, antidepressants, herbal medicines, homeopathy, hypnotherapy and psychological therapy for IBS. The certainty of evidence ranged from unknown to moderate, mainly due to imprecision in the estimates and high risk of bias from the primary studies included. There was moderate certainty of evidence that acupuncture had no important benefit regarding improvement of symptoms and quality of life, compared with sham acupuncture. There was also very low certainty of evidence that homeopathic asafoetida, used alone or in association with nux, was better than placebo regarding self-reported overall improvement. CONCLUSION: There was moderate certainty of evidence that acupuncture had no important benefit regarding improvement of symptoms and quality of life. Further well-designed and well-conducted randomized clinical trials are needed in order to reduce the uncertainties regarding the most commonly used interventions for patients with IBS.
id APM-1_e208905199734f04527308e5848c6fa4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802019000100082
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about the management of irritable bowel syndrome?Review [publication type]Irritable bowel syndromeColonic diseases, functionalEvidence-based medicineEvidence-based practiceABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a clinical disorder associated with high socioeconomic burden. Despite its importance, management of IBS remains difficult and several interventions have been hypothesized as beneficial for this condition. This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) about the effects of interventions for managing IBS patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, carried out in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: Review of Cochrane SRs addressing interventions for IBS. RESULTS: We included six SRs assessing acupuncture, bulking agents, antispasmodics, antidepressants, herbal medicines, homeopathy, hypnotherapy and psychological therapy for IBS. The certainty of evidence ranged from unknown to moderate, mainly due to imprecision in the estimates and high risk of bias from the primary studies included. There was moderate certainty of evidence that acupuncture had no important benefit regarding improvement of symptoms and quality of life, compared with sham acupuncture. There was also very low certainty of evidence that homeopathic asafoetida, used alone or in association with nux, was better than placebo regarding self-reported overall improvement. CONCLUSION: There was moderate certainty of evidence that acupuncture had no important benefit regarding improvement of symptoms and quality of life. Further well-designed and well-conducted randomized clinical trials are needed in order to reduce the uncertainties regarding the most commonly used interventions for patients with IBS.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2019-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802019000100082Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.137 n.1 2019reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/1516-3180.2018.053740119info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPacheco,Rafael LeiteRoizenblatt,ArnaldoGóis,Aécio Flávio Teixeira deLatorraca,Carolina de Oliveira CruzMota,Carolina Frade Magalhães Girardin PimentelRiera,Racheleng2019-05-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802019000100082Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2019-05-14T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about the management of irritable bowel syndrome?
title What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about the management of irritable bowel syndrome?
spellingShingle What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about the management of irritable bowel syndrome?
Pacheco,Rafael Leite
Review [publication type]
Irritable bowel syndrome
Colonic diseases, functional
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based practice
title_short What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about the management of irritable bowel syndrome?
title_full What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about the management of irritable bowel syndrome?
title_fullStr What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about the management of irritable bowel syndrome?
title_full_unstemmed What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about the management of irritable bowel syndrome?
title_sort What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about the management of irritable bowel syndrome?
author Pacheco,Rafael Leite
author_facet Pacheco,Rafael Leite
Roizenblatt,Arnaldo
Góis,Aécio Flávio Teixeira de
Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz
Mota,Carolina Frade Magalhães Girardin Pimentel
Riera,Rachel
author_role author
author2 Roizenblatt,Arnaldo
Góis,Aécio Flávio Teixeira de
Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz
Mota,Carolina Frade Magalhães Girardin Pimentel
Riera,Rachel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pacheco,Rafael Leite
Roizenblatt,Arnaldo
Góis,Aécio Flávio Teixeira de
Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz
Mota,Carolina Frade Magalhães Girardin Pimentel
Riera,Rachel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Review [publication type]
Irritable bowel syndrome
Colonic diseases, functional
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based practice
topic Review [publication type]
Irritable bowel syndrome
Colonic diseases, functional
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based practice
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a clinical disorder associated with high socioeconomic burden. Despite its importance, management of IBS remains difficult and several interventions have been hypothesized as beneficial for this condition. This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) about the effects of interventions for managing IBS patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, carried out in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: Review of Cochrane SRs addressing interventions for IBS. RESULTS: We included six SRs assessing acupuncture, bulking agents, antispasmodics, antidepressants, herbal medicines, homeopathy, hypnotherapy and psychological therapy for IBS. The certainty of evidence ranged from unknown to moderate, mainly due to imprecision in the estimates and high risk of bias from the primary studies included. There was moderate certainty of evidence that acupuncture had no important benefit regarding improvement of symptoms and quality of life, compared with sham acupuncture. There was also very low certainty of evidence that homeopathic asafoetida, used alone or in association with nux, was better than placebo regarding self-reported overall improvement. CONCLUSION: There was moderate certainty of evidence that acupuncture had no important benefit regarding improvement of symptoms and quality of life. Further well-designed and well-conducted randomized clinical trials are needed in order to reduce the uncertainties regarding the most commonly used interventions for patients with IBS.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802019000100082
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802019000100082
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-3180.2018.053740119
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.137 n.1 2019
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209266619645952