Epidural versus intravenous fentanyl for postoperative analgesia following orthopedic surgery: randomized controlled trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Privado,Marcelo Soares
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Issy,Adriana Machado, Lanchote,Vera Lucia, Garcia,João Batista Santos, Sakata,Rioko Kimiko
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802010000100002
Resumo: CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Controversy exists regarding the site of action of fentanyl after epidural injection. The objective of this investigation was to compare the efficacy of epidural and intravenous fentanyl for orthopedic surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: A randomized double-blind study was performed in Hospital São Paulo. METHODS: During the postoperative period, in the presence of pain, 29 patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 14) received 100 µg of fentanyl epidurally and 2 ml of saline intravenously; group 2 (n = 15) received 5 ml of saline epidurally and 100 µg of fentanyl intravenously. The analgesic supplementation consisted of 40 mg of tenoxicam intravenously and, if necessary, 5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine epidurally. Pain intensity was evaluated on a numerical scale and plasma concentrations of fentanyl were measured simultaneously. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who required supplementary analgesia with tenoxicam was lower in group 1 (71.4%) than in group 2 (100%): 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.001-0.4360 (P = 0.001, Fisher's exact test; relative risk, RR = 0.07). Epidural bupivacaine supplementation was also lower in group 1 (14.3%) than in group 2 (53.3%): 95% CI = 0.06-1.05 (P = 0.03, Fisher's exact test; RR = 0.26). There was no difference in pain intensity on the numerical scale. Mean fentanyl plasma concentrations were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Intravenous and epidural fentanyl appear to have similar efficacy for reducing pain according to the numerical scale, but supplementary analgesia was needed less frequently when epidural fentanyl was used. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00635986
id APM-1_e92317318f538bcc008cf4641e14c5e7
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802010000100002
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Epidural versus intravenous fentanyl for postoperative analgesia following orthopedic surgery: randomized controlled trialAnalgesiaAnalgesia epiduralFentanylPharmacologyOrthopedicsCONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Controversy exists regarding the site of action of fentanyl after epidural injection. The objective of this investigation was to compare the efficacy of epidural and intravenous fentanyl for orthopedic surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: A randomized double-blind study was performed in Hospital São Paulo. METHODS: During the postoperative period, in the presence of pain, 29 patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 14) received 100 µg of fentanyl epidurally and 2 ml of saline intravenously; group 2 (n = 15) received 5 ml of saline epidurally and 100 µg of fentanyl intravenously. The analgesic supplementation consisted of 40 mg of tenoxicam intravenously and, if necessary, 5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine epidurally. Pain intensity was evaluated on a numerical scale and plasma concentrations of fentanyl were measured simultaneously. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who required supplementary analgesia with tenoxicam was lower in group 1 (71.4%) than in group 2 (100%): 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.001-0.4360 (P = 0.001, Fisher's exact test; relative risk, RR = 0.07). Epidural bupivacaine supplementation was also lower in group 1 (14.3%) than in group 2 (53.3%): 95% CI = 0.06-1.05 (P = 0.03, Fisher's exact test; RR = 0.26). There was no difference in pain intensity on the numerical scale. Mean fentanyl plasma concentrations were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Intravenous and epidural fentanyl appear to have similar efficacy for reducing pain according to the numerical scale, but supplementary analgesia was needed less frequently when epidural fentanyl was used. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00635986Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2010-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802010000100002Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.128 n.1 2010reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/S1516-31802010000100002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPrivado,Marcelo SoaresIssy,Adriana MachadoLanchote,Vera LuciaGarcia,João Batista SantosSakata,Rioko Kimikoeng2010-05-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802010000100002Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2010-05-24T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Epidural versus intravenous fentanyl for postoperative analgesia following orthopedic surgery: randomized controlled trial
title Epidural versus intravenous fentanyl for postoperative analgesia following orthopedic surgery: randomized controlled trial
spellingShingle Epidural versus intravenous fentanyl for postoperative analgesia following orthopedic surgery: randomized controlled trial
Privado,Marcelo Soares
Analgesia
Analgesia epidural
Fentanyl
Pharmacology
Orthopedics
title_short Epidural versus intravenous fentanyl for postoperative analgesia following orthopedic surgery: randomized controlled trial
title_full Epidural versus intravenous fentanyl for postoperative analgesia following orthopedic surgery: randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Epidural versus intravenous fentanyl for postoperative analgesia following orthopedic surgery: randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Epidural versus intravenous fentanyl for postoperative analgesia following orthopedic surgery: randomized controlled trial
title_sort Epidural versus intravenous fentanyl for postoperative analgesia following orthopedic surgery: randomized controlled trial
author Privado,Marcelo Soares
author_facet Privado,Marcelo Soares
Issy,Adriana Machado
Lanchote,Vera Lucia
Garcia,João Batista Santos
Sakata,Rioko Kimiko
author_role author
author2 Issy,Adriana Machado
Lanchote,Vera Lucia
Garcia,João Batista Santos
Sakata,Rioko Kimiko
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Privado,Marcelo Soares
Issy,Adriana Machado
Lanchote,Vera Lucia
Garcia,João Batista Santos
Sakata,Rioko Kimiko
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Analgesia
Analgesia epidural
Fentanyl
Pharmacology
Orthopedics
topic Analgesia
Analgesia epidural
Fentanyl
Pharmacology
Orthopedics
description CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Controversy exists regarding the site of action of fentanyl after epidural injection. The objective of this investigation was to compare the efficacy of epidural and intravenous fentanyl for orthopedic surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: A randomized double-blind study was performed in Hospital São Paulo. METHODS: During the postoperative period, in the presence of pain, 29 patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 14) received 100 µg of fentanyl epidurally and 2 ml of saline intravenously; group 2 (n = 15) received 5 ml of saline epidurally and 100 µg of fentanyl intravenously. The analgesic supplementation consisted of 40 mg of tenoxicam intravenously and, if necessary, 5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine epidurally. Pain intensity was evaluated on a numerical scale and plasma concentrations of fentanyl were measured simultaneously. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who required supplementary analgesia with tenoxicam was lower in group 1 (71.4%) than in group 2 (100%): 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.001-0.4360 (P = 0.001, Fisher's exact test; relative risk, RR = 0.07). Epidural bupivacaine supplementation was also lower in group 1 (14.3%) than in group 2 (53.3%): 95% CI = 0.06-1.05 (P = 0.03, Fisher's exact test; RR = 0.26). There was no difference in pain intensity on the numerical scale. Mean fentanyl plasma concentrations were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Intravenous and epidural fentanyl appear to have similar efficacy for reducing pain according to the numerical scale, but supplementary analgesia was needed less frequently when epidural fentanyl was used. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00635986
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802010000100002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802010000100002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-31802010000100002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.128 n.1 2010
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209262586822656