Common mental disorders in mothers vs. infant and obstetric outcomes: a review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Borba,Paula
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Zambaldi,Carla Fonseca, Cantilino,Amaury, Sougey,Everton Botelho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892012000400002
Resumo: INTRODUCTION: Pregnancy has been shown to increase women’s vulnerability to mental disorders. Common mental disorders (CMDs) have been studied both in the general population and in pregnant vs. non-pregnant women. During pregnancy, CMDs have been considered a potential predictor of obstetric and infant outcomes. METHODS: A search was conducted on the PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, and SciELO databases to find relevant articles written in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. No limit was established for year of publication, but only studies involving human beings were included. RESULTS: A total of 25 articles were selected. There was a consensus among studies that the mean prevalence of CMD during pregnancy is 20%. There was also agreement that the occurrence of CMDs during pregnancy is a predictor of postpartum depression and anxiety disorders and that the disorder remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. As for the positive association between CMDs and obstetric and infant complications, results are still conflicting. In lower-income countries, frequently there is an association between CMD and perinatal changes. It is argued that some confounding factors, such as sociodemographic and cultural differences, health and maternal conditions, and type of instruments used, probably contribute to this lack of consensus. CONCLUSION: We believe that the conflicting results found in the literature are caused by differences in methodology and sociodemographic factors that influence the development of CMDs. Despite these differences, our findings underscore the need for depression and anxiety disorders during pregnancy to be studied and better identified by all professionals who provide antenatal care.
id APRGS-1_f2bd418ccce5faffb5ae29420f328dc3
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2237-60892012000400002
network_acronym_str APRGS-1
network_name_str Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
repository_id_str
spelling Common mental disorders in mothers vs. infant and obstetric outcomes: a reviewMental disorderswomenpregnancyinfantINTRODUCTION: Pregnancy has been shown to increase women’s vulnerability to mental disorders. Common mental disorders (CMDs) have been studied both in the general population and in pregnant vs. non-pregnant women. During pregnancy, CMDs have been considered a potential predictor of obstetric and infant outcomes. METHODS: A search was conducted on the PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, and SciELO databases to find relevant articles written in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. No limit was established for year of publication, but only studies involving human beings were included. RESULTS: A total of 25 articles were selected. There was a consensus among studies that the mean prevalence of CMD during pregnancy is 20%. There was also agreement that the occurrence of CMDs during pregnancy is a predictor of postpartum depression and anxiety disorders and that the disorder remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. As for the positive association between CMDs and obstetric and infant complications, results are still conflicting. In lower-income countries, frequently there is an association between CMD and perinatal changes. It is argued that some confounding factors, such as sociodemographic and cultural differences, health and maternal conditions, and type of instruments used, probably contribute to this lack of consensus. CONCLUSION: We believe that the conflicting results found in the literature are caused by differences in methodology and sociodemographic factors that influence the development of CMDs. Despite these differences, our findings underscore the need for depression and anxiety disorders during pregnancy to be studied and better identified by all professionals who provide antenatal care.Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul2012-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892012000400002Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy v.34 n.4 2012reponame:Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapyinstname:Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sulinstacron:APRGS10.1590/S2237-60892012000400002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorba,PaulaZambaldi,Carla FonsecaCantilino,AmaurySougey,Everton Botelhoeng2013-01-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2237-60892012000400002Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2237-6089&lng=en&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevista@aprs.org.br|| rodrigo_grassi@terra.com.br2238-00192237-6089opendoar:2013-01-17T00:00Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy - Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sulfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Common mental disorders in mothers vs. infant and obstetric outcomes: a review
title Common mental disorders in mothers vs. infant and obstetric outcomes: a review
spellingShingle Common mental disorders in mothers vs. infant and obstetric outcomes: a review
Borba,Paula
Mental disorders
women
pregnancy
infant
title_short Common mental disorders in mothers vs. infant and obstetric outcomes: a review
title_full Common mental disorders in mothers vs. infant and obstetric outcomes: a review
title_fullStr Common mental disorders in mothers vs. infant and obstetric outcomes: a review
title_full_unstemmed Common mental disorders in mothers vs. infant and obstetric outcomes: a review
title_sort Common mental disorders in mothers vs. infant and obstetric outcomes: a review
author Borba,Paula
author_facet Borba,Paula
Zambaldi,Carla Fonseca
Cantilino,Amaury
Sougey,Everton Botelho
author_role author
author2 Zambaldi,Carla Fonseca
Cantilino,Amaury
Sougey,Everton Botelho
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Borba,Paula
Zambaldi,Carla Fonseca
Cantilino,Amaury
Sougey,Everton Botelho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mental disorders
women
pregnancy
infant
topic Mental disorders
women
pregnancy
infant
description INTRODUCTION: Pregnancy has been shown to increase women’s vulnerability to mental disorders. Common mental disorders (CMDs) have been studied both in the general population and in pregnant vs. non-pregnant women. During pregnancy, CMDs have been considered a potential predictor of obstetric and infant outcomes. METHODS: A search was conducted on the PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, and SciELO databases to find relevant articles written in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. No limit was established for year of publication, but only studies involving human beings were included. RESULTS: A total of 25 articles were selected. There was a consensus among studies that the mean prevalence of CMD during pregnancy is 20%. There was also agreement that the occurrence of CMDs during pregnancy is a predictor of postpartum depression and anxiety disorders and that the disorder remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. As for the positive association between CMDs and obstetric and infant complications, results are still conflicting. In lower-income countries, frequently there is an association between CMD and perinatal changes. It is argued that some confounding factors, such as sociodemographic and cultural differences, health and maternal conditions, and type of instruments used, probably contribute to this lack of consensus. CONCLUSION: We believe that the conflicting results found in the literature are caused by differences in methodology and sociodemographic factors that influence the development of CMDs. Despite these differences, our findings underscore the need for depression and anxiety disorders during pregnancy to be studied and better identified by all professionals who provide antenatal care.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892012000400002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892012000400002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S2237-60892012000400002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy v.34 n.4 2012
reponame:Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
instname:Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
instacron:APRGS
instname_str Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
instacron_str APRGS
institution APRGS
reponame_str Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
collection Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
repository.name.fl_str_mv Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy - Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@aprs.org.br|| rodrigo_grassi@terra.com.br
_version_ 1754209280131596288