The dialog between psychoanalysis and neuroscience: what does philosophy of mind say?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cheniaux,Elie
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Lyra,Carlos Eduardo de Sousa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892014000400186
Resumo: Objective: To briefly review how the main monist and dualist currents of philosophy of mind approach the mind-body problem and to describe their association with arguments for and against a closer dialog between psychoanalysis and neuroscience.Methods: The literature was reviewed for studies in the fields of psychology, psychoanalysis, neuroscience, and philosophy of mind.Results: Some currents are incompatible with a closer dialog between psychoanalysis and neurosciences: interactionism and psychophysical parallelism, because they do not account for current knowledge about the brain; epiphenomenalism, which claims that the mind is a mere byproduct of the brain; and analytical behaviorism, eliminative materialism, reductive materialism and functionalism, because they ignore subjective experiences. In contrast, emergentism claims that mental states are dependent on brain states, but have properties that go beyond the field of neurobiology.Conclusions: Only emergentism is compatible with a closer dialog between psychoanalysis and neuroscience.
id APRGS-1_f47831889ae664f7bfbe173724f232a6
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2237-60892014000400186
network_acronym_str APRGS-1
network_name_str Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
repository_id_str
spelling The dialog between psychoanalysis and neuroscience: what does philosophy of mind say?Philosophy of mindmind-body problempsychoanalysisneuroscienceObjective: To briefly review how the main monist and dualist currents of philosophy of mind approach the mind-body problem and to describe their association with arguments for and against a closer dialog between psychoanalysis and neuroscience.Methods: The literature was reviewed for studies in the fields of psychology, psychoanalysis, neuroscience, and philosophy of mind.Results: Some currents are incompatible with a closer dialog between psychoanalysis and neurosciences: interactionism and psychophysical parallelism, because they do not account for current knowledge about the brain; epiphenomenalism, which claims that the mind is a mere byproduct of the brain; and analytical behaviorism, eliminative materialism, reductive materialism and functionalism, because they ignore subjective experiences. In contrast, emergentism claims that mental states are dependent on brain states, but have properties that go beyond the field of neurobiology.Conclusions: Only emergentism is compatible with a closer dialog between psychoanalysis and neuroscience.Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul2014-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892014000400186Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy v.36 n.4 2014reponame:Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapyinstname:Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sulinstacron:APRGS10.1590/2237-6089-2014-0010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCheniaux,ElieLyra,Carlos Eduardo de Sousaeng2015-09-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2237-60892014000400186Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2237-6089&lng=en&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevista@aprs.org.br|| rodrigo_grassi@terra.com.br2238-00192237-6089opendoar:2015-09-29T00:00Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy - Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sulfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The dialog between psychoanalysis and neuroscience: what does philosophy of mind say?
title The dialog between psychoanalysis and neuroscience: what does philosophy of mind say?
spellingShingle The dialog between psychoanalysis and neuroscience: what does philosophy of mind say?
Cheniaux,Elie
Philosophy of mind
mind-body problem
psychoanalysis
neuroscience
title_short The dialog between psychoanalysis and neuroscience: what does philosophy of mind say?
title_full The dialog between psychoanalysis and neuroscience: what does philosophy of mind say?
title_fullStr The dialog between psychoanalysis and neuroscience: what does philosophy of mind say?
title_full_unstemmed The dialog between psychoanalysis and neuroscience: what does philosophy of mind say?
title_sort The dialog between psychoanalysis and neuroscience: what does philosophy of mind say?
author Cheniaux,Elie
author_facet Cheniaux,Elie
Lyra,Carlos Eduardo de Sousa
author_role author
author2 Lyra,Carlos Eduardo de Sousa
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cheniaux,Elie
Lyra,Carlos Eduardo de Sousa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Philosophy of mind
mind-body problem
psychoanalysis
neuroscience
topic Philosophy of mind
mind-body problem
psychoanalysis
neuroscience
description Objective: To briefly review how the main monist and dualist currents of philosophy of mind approach the mind-body problem and to describe their association with arguments for and against a closer dialog between psychoanalysis and neuroscience.Methods: The literature was reviewed for studies in the fields of psychology, psychoanalysis, neuroscience, and philosophy of mind.Results: Some currents are incompatible with a closer dialog between psychoanalysis and neurosciences: interactionism and psychophysical parallelism, because they do not account for current knowledge about the brain; epiphenomenalism, which claims that the mind is a mere byproduct of the brain; and analytical behaviorism, eliminative materialism, reductive materialism and functionalism, because they ignore subjective experiences. In contrast, emergentism claims that mental states are dependent on brain states, but have properties that go beyond the field of neurobiology.Conclusions: Only emergentism is compatible with a closer dialog between psychoanalysis and neuroscience.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892014000400186
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892014000400186
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2237-6089-2014-0010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy v.36 n.4 2014
reponame:Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
instname:Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
instacron:APRGS
instname_str Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
instacron_str APRGS
institution APRGS
reponame_str Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
collection Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
repository.name.fl_str_mv Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy - Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@aprs.org.br|| rodrigo_grassi@terra.com.br
_version_ 1754209280517472256

Registros relacionados