Differences in coping strategies in adult patients with bipolar disorder and their first-degree relatives in comparison to healthy controls

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bridi,Kelen Patrícia Bürke
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Loredo-Souza,Ana Claudia M., Fijtman,Adam, Moreno,Mirela Vasconcelos, Kauer-Sant'Anna,Márcia, Ceresér,Keila Maria Mendes, Kunz,Mauricio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892018000400318
Resumo: Abstract Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare patients with bipolar disorder (BD), their first-degree relatives and a group of healthy controls in terms of use of adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies, exploring differences between specific types of strategies and their correlations with clinical variables. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study enrolling 36 euthymic patients with BD, 39 of their first-degree relatives and 44 controls. Coping strategies were assessed using the Brief COPE scale. Results: Significant differences were detected in the use of adaptive and maladaptive strategies by patients, their first-degree relatives and controls. Patients used adaptive strategies less often than the patients’ relatives (p<0.001) and controls (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference between first-degree relatives and controls (p=0.707). In contrast, patients (p<0.001) and their relatives (p=0.004) both exhibited higher scores for maladaptive coping than controls. There was no significant difference regarding the use of maladaptive strategies between patients and their relatives (p=0.517). Conclusions: First-degree relatives were at an intermediate level between patients with BD and controls regarding the use of coping skills. This finding supports the development of psychosocial interventions to encourage use of adaptive strategies rather than maladaptive strategies in this population.
id APRGS-1_f763a7c0bc19d7a30bddd9051cd72dd2
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2237-60892018000400318
network_acronym_str APRGS-1
network_name_str Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
repository_id_str
spelling Differences in coping strategies in adult patients with bipolar disorder and their first-degree relatives in comparison to healthy controlsCopingBrief COPEbipolar disorderfirst-degree relativesAbstract Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare patients with bipolar disorder (BD), their first-degree relatives and a group of healthy controls in terms of use of adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies, exploring differences between specific types of strategies and their correlations with clinical variables. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study enrolling 36 euthymic patients with BD, 39 of their first-degree relatives and 44 controls. Coping strategies were assessed using the Brief COPE scale. Results: Significant differences were detected in the use of adaptive and maladaptive strategies by patients, their first-degree relatives and controls. Patients used adaptive strategies less often than the patients’ relatives (p<0.001) and controls (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference between first-degree relatives and controls (p=0.707). In contrast, patients (p<0.001) and their relatives (p=0.004) both exhibited higher scores for maladaptive coping than controls. There was no significant difference regarding the use of maladaptive strategies between patients and their relatives (p=0.517). Conclusions: First-degree relatives were at an intermediate level between patients with BD and controls regarding the use of coping skills. This finding supports the development of psychosocial interventions to encourage use of adaptive strategies rather than maladaptive strategies in this population.Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892018000400318Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy v.40 n.4 2018reponame:Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapyinstname:Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sulinstacron:APRGS10.1590/2237-6089-2017-0140info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBridi,Kelen Patrícia BürkeLoredo-Souza,Ana Claudia M.Fijtman,AdamMoreno,Mirela VasconcelosKauer-Sant'Anna,MárciaCeresér,Keila Maria MendesKunz,Mauricioeng2019-04-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2237-60892018000400318Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2237-6089&lng=en&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevista@aprs.org.br|| rodrigo_grassi@terra.com.br2238-00192237-6089opendoar:2019-04-08T00:00Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy - Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sulfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Differences in coping strategies in adult patients with bipolar disorder and their first-degree relatives in comparison to healthy controls
title Differences in coping strategies in adult patients with bipolar disorder and their first-degree relatives in comparison to healthy controls
spellingShingle Differences in coping strategies in adult patients with bipolar disorder and their first-degree relatives in comparison to healthy controls
Bridi,Kelen Patrícia Bürke
Coping
Brief COPE
bipolar disorder
first-degree relatives
title_short Differences in coping strategies in adult patients with bipolar disorder and their first-degree relatives in comparison to healthy controls
title_full Differences in coping strategies in adult patients with bipolar disorder and their first-degree relatives in comparison to healthy controls
title_fullStr Differences in coping strategies in adult patients with bipolar disorder and their first-degree relatives in comparison to healthy controls
title_full_unstemmed Differences in coping strategies in adult patients with bipolar disorder and their first-degree relatives in comparison to healthy controls
title_sort Differences in coping strategies in adult patients with bipolar disorder and their first-degree relatives in comparison to healthy controls
author Bridi,Kelen Patrícia Bürke
author_facet Bridi,Kelen Patrícia Bürke
Loredo-Souza,Ana Claudia M.
Fijtman,Adam
Moreno,Mirela Vasconcelos
Kauer-Sant'Anna,Márcia
Ceresér,Keila Maria Mendes
Kunz,Mauricio
author_role author
author2 Loredo-Souza,Ana Claudia M.
Fijtman,Adam
Moreno,Mirela Vasconcelos
Kauer-Sant'Anna,Márcia
Ceresér,Keila Maria Mendes
Kunz,Mauricio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bridi,Kelen Patrícia Bürke
Loredo-Souza,Ana Claudia M.
Fijtman,Adam
Moreno,Mirela Vasconcelos
Kauer-Sant'Anna,Márcia
Ceresér,Keila Maria Mendes
Kunz,Mauricio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Coping
Brief COPE
bipolar disorder
first-degree relatives
topic Coping
Brief COPE
bipolar disorder
first-degree relatives
description Abstract Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare patients with bipolar disorder (BD), their first-degree relatives and a group of healthy controls in terms of use of adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies, exploring differences between specific types of strategies and their correlations with clinical variables. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study enrolling 36 euthymic patients with BD, 39 of their first-degree relatives and 44 controls. Coping strategies were assessed using the Brief COPE scale. Results: Significant differences were detected in the use of adaptive and maladaptive strategies by patients, their first-degree relatives and controls. Patients used adaptive strategies less often than the patients’ relatives (p<0.001) and controls (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference between first-degree relatives and controls (p=0.707). In contrast, patients (p<0.001) and their relatives (p=0.004) both exhibited higher scores for maladaptive coping than controls. There was no significant difference regarding the use of maladaptive strategies between patients and their relatives (p=0.517). Conclusions: First-degree relatives were at an intermediate level between patients with BD and controls regarding the use of coping skills. This finding supports the development of psychosocial interventions to encourage use of adaptive strategies rather than maladaptive strategies in this population.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892018000400318
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892018000400318
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2237-6089-2017-0140
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy v.40 n.4 2018
reponame:Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
instname:Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
instacron:APRGS
instname_str Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
instacron_str APRGS
institution APRGS
reponame_str Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
collection Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
repository.name.fl_str_mv Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy - Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@aprs.org.br|| rodrigo_grassi@terra.com.br
_version_ 1754209281097334784