Effectiveness in the removal of bioceramic sealers versus conventional sealers: systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tookuni, Izabela Volpato Marques
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Capitânio, Marcelo, da Silva, Breno Gabriel, Kussaba, Isabela Inoue, Pavan, Nair Narumi Orita, Endo, Marcos Sergio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Health Review
Texto Completo: https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/article/view/61419
Resumo: This study aimed to carry out a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness in removing bioceramic sealers compared to conventional sealers commonly used, evaluated through the percentage of remaining material. The electronic search was carried out in the following databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and in gray literature, at the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (BDTD).  Two independent researchers conducted the survey to identify the studies, without restrictions on year and language of publication, using the PICO strategy until the month of August 2020. A total of 80 titles were retrieved in the initial search, however, only 9 studies were included for the qualitative synthesis and 5 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. The descriptive results indicated that the average time taken to remove the filling material was longer for bioceramics by approximately 67% of the studies that evaluated this condition, and with regard to the establishment of patency, no difference was detected between the sealers. It could be observed that bioceramic sealers presented a lower amount of remaining material than conventional sealers (p = 0.01) both in the overall analysis and in the analysis of subgroups. The removal of conventional sealer proved to be inferior to bioceramic sealers, with greater amounts of material remaining in the root canals after endodontic retreatment. The use of bioceramic sealers has gained space in the endodontic practice. However, it is not yet known whether these sealers affect the removal of root canal fillings during retreatments.
id BJRH-0_3d6d3363feb1e7576772dda72eca0b30
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br:article/61419
network_acronym_str BJRH-0
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Health Review
repository_id_str
spelling Effectiveness in the removal of bioceramic sealers versus conventional sealers: systematic review and meta-analysissystematic reviewbioceramic sealerendodontic sealermeta-analysisThis study aimed to carry out a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness in removing bioceramic sealers compared to conventional sealers commonly used, evaluated through the percentage of remaining material. The electronic search was carried out in the following databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and in gray literature, at the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (BDTD).  Two independent researchers conducted the survey to identify the studies, without restrictions on year and language of publication, using the PICO strategy until the month of August 2020. A total of 80 titles were retrieved in the initial search, however, only 9 studies were included for the qualitative synthesis and 5 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. The descriptive results indicated that the average time taken to remove the filling material was longer for bioceramics by approximately 67% of the studies that evaluated this condition, and with regard to the establishment of patency, no difference was detected between the sealers. It could be observed that bioceramic sealers presented a lower amount of remaining material than conventional sealers (p = 0.01) both in the overall analysis and in the analysis of subgroups. The removal of conventional sealer proved to be inferior to bioceramic sealers, with greater amounts of material remaining in the root canals after endodontic retreatment. The use of bioceramic sealers has gained space in the endodontic practice. However, it is not yet known whether these sealers affect the removal of root canal fillings during retreatments.Brazilian Journals Publicações de Periódicos e Editora Ltda.2023-07-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/article/view/6141910.34119/bjhrv6n4-082Brazilian Journal of Health Review; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2023); 15002-15024Brazilian Journal of Health Review; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2023); 15002-15024Brazilian Journal of Health Review; v. 6 n. 4 (2023); 15002-150242595-6825reponame:Brazilian Journal of Health Reviewinstname:Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Paraná (FIEP)instacron:BJRHenghttps://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/article/view/61419/44276Tookuni, Izabela Volpato MarquesCapitânio, Marceloda Silva, Breno GabrielKussaba, Isabela InouePavan, Nair Narumi OritaEndo, Marcos Sergioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-04T13:15:39Zoai:ojs2.ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br:article/61419Revistahttp://www.brazilianjournals.com/index.php/BJHR/indexPRIhttps://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/oai|| brazilianjhr@gmail.com2595-68252595-6825opendoar:2023-09-04T13:15:39Brazilian Journal of Health Review - Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Paraná (FIEP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effectiveness in the removal of bioceramic sealers versus conventional sealers: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effectiveness in the removal of bioceramic sealers versus conventional sealers: systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Effectiveness in the removal of bioceramic sealers versus conventional sealers: systematic review and meta-analysis
Tookuni, Izabela Volpato Marques
systematic review
bioceramic sealer
endodontic sealer
meta-analysis
title_short Effectiveness in the removal of bioceramic sealers versus conventional sealers: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effectiveness in the removal of bioceramic sealers versus conventional sealers: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness in the removal of bioceramic sealers versus conventional sealers: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness in the removal of bioceramic sealers versus conventional sealers: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Effectiveness in the removal of bioceramic sealers versus conventional sealers: systematic review and meta-analysis
author Tookuni, Izabela Volpato Marques
author_facet Tookuni, Izabela Volpato Marques
Capitânio, Marcelo
da Silva, Breno Gabriel
Kussaba, Isabela Inoue
Pavan, Nair Narumi Orita
Endo, Marcos Sergio
author_role author
author2 Capitânio, Marcelo
da Silva, Breno Gabriel
Kussaba, Isabela Inoue
Pavan, Nair Narumi Orita
Endo, Marcos Sergio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tookuni, Izabela Volpato Marques
Capitânio, Marcelo
da Silva, Breno Gabriel
Kussaba, Isabela Inoue
Pavan, Nair Narumi Orita
Endo, Marcos Sergio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv systematic review
bioceramic sealer
endodontic sealer
meta-analysis
topic systematic review
bioceramic sealer
endodontic sealer
meta-analysis
description This study aimed to carry out a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness in removing bioceramic sealers compared to conventional sealers commonly used, evaluated through the percentage of remaining material. The electronic search was carried out in the following databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and in gray literature, at the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (BDTD).  Two independent researchers conducted the survey to identify the studies, without restrictions on year and language of publication, using the PICO strategy until the month of August 2020. A total of 80 titles were retrieved in the initial search, however, only 9 studies were included for the qualitative synthesis and 5 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. The descriptive results indicated that the average time taken to remove the filling material was longer for bioceramics by approximately 67% of the studies that evaluated this condition, and with regard to the establishment of patency, no difference was detected between the sealers. It could be observed that bioceramic sealers presented a lower amount of remaining material than conventional sealers (p = 0.01) both in the overall analysis and in the analysis of subgroups. The removal of conventional sealer proved to be inferior to bioceramic sealers, with greater amounts of material remaining in the root canals after endodontic retreatment. The use of bioceramic sealers has gained space in the endodontic practice. However, it is not yet known whether these sealers affect the removal of root canal fillings during retreatments.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/article/view/61419
10.34119/bjhrv6n4-082
url https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/article/view/61419
identifier_str_mv 10.34119/bjhrv6n4-082
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/article/view/61419/44276
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journals Publicações de Periódicos e Editora Ltda.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journals Publicações de Periódicos e Editora Ltda.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Health Review; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2023); 15002-15024
Brazilian Journal of Health Review; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2023); 15002-15024
Brazilian Journal of Health Review; v. 6 n. 4 (2023); 15002-15024
2595-6825
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Health Review
instname:Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Paraná (FIEP)
instacron:BJRH
instname_str Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Paraná (FIEP)
instacron_str BJRH
institution BJRH
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Health Review
collection Brazilian Journal of Health Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Health Review - Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Paraná (FIEP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv || brazilianjhr@gmail.com
_version_ 1797240031905054720