Pharmacokinetic analysis and bioequivalence of Finasteride and Doxazosin formulated in a single tablet in comparison with the corresponding single agents

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guimaraes, Camila Leles
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Galvinas, Paulo Alexandre Rebelo, Baratta, Juliana Almeida, Pinto, Guilherme Araújo, Brandão, Amanda Hayashi, Sverdloff, Carlos, Rezende, Vinicius Marcondes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Health Review
Texto Completo: https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/article/view/59429
Resumo: The most commonly agents used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in clinical practice are finasteride and doxazosin employed alone or in combination. Randomized clinical trials have shown that combination therapy with finasteride and doxazosin is superior to finasteride alone or placebo. However, decreased patient compliance may lead to unsatisfactorily therapeutic results. The aim of this study was to assess whether the combined pharmacokinetic profile for both finasteride and doxazosin was not significantly altered when these agents were co-administered, in comparison with their use as single agents. This was a randomized 6 sequences and 3 periods, crossover, comparative study of three medications: finasteride (5 mg), doxazosin (2 mg) (references), and the fixed combination containing 5 mg of finasteride and 2 mg of doxazosin in a single tablet (test). Plasma samples obtained from 30 eligible subjects were analyzed simultaneously for finasteride and doxazosin by HPLC coupled to a LC-MS/MS having cyproterone acetate and terazosin as internal standards. The statistical analysis showed no significant differences for AUC0-72h (finasteride: 245.3±87.8 vs. test: 240.5±93.1 and doxazosin: 183.0±42.9 vs. test: 188.8±45.6 ng.h.mL-1), AUC0-∞ (finasteride: 247.4±92.1 vs. test:  40.47±93.1 and doxazosin: 190.3±44.3 vs. test: 188.8±45.6 ng.h.mL-1), and Cmax (finasteride: 34.2±7.1 vs. test: 29.9±6.2 and doxazosin: 16.3±3.6 vs. test: 14.9±3.3 ng/mL). The mean ratios of AUC0-72h/AUC0-∞ for finasteride and doxazosin were 99.99% and 99.98%, respectively, indicating that the sampling time was adequate for both drugs. In summary, the current pharmacokinetic study demonstrated bioequivalence between the single agents and the corresponding agents in combination and provided further evidence for the lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between finasteride and doxazosin.
id BJRH-0_6584b979b8f6cd192f5338b592b333dd
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br:article/59429
network_acronym_str BJRH-0
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Health Review
repository_id_str
spelling Pharmacokinetic analysis and bioequivalence of Finasteride and Doxazosin formulated in a single tablet in comparison with the corresponding single agentsDoxazosinFinasteridepharmacokineticsbenign prostatic hyperplasiatherapeutic equivalencebioequivalenceThe most commonly agents used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in clinical practice are finasteride and doxazosin employed alone or in combination. Randomized clinical trials have shown that combination therapy with finasteride and doxazosin is superior to finasteride alone or placebo. However, decreased patient compliance may lead to unsatisfactorily therapeutic results. The aim of this study was to assess whether the combined pharmacokinetic profile for both finasteride and doxazosin was not significantly altered when these agents were co-administered, in comparison with their use as single agents. This was a randomized 6 sequences and 3 periods, crossover, comparative study of three medications: finasteride (5 mg), doxazosin (2 mg) (references), and the fixed combination containing 5 mg of finasteride and 2 mg of doxazosin in a single tablet (test). Plasma samples obtained from 30 eligible subjects were analyzed simultaneously for finasteride and doxazosin by HPLC coupled to a LC-MS/MS having cyproterone acetate and terazosin as internal standards. The statistical analysis showed no significant differences for AUC0-72h (finasteride: 245.3±87.8 vs. test: 240.5±93.1 and doxazosin: 183.0±42.9 vs. test: 188.8±45.6 ng.h.mL-1), AUC0-∞ (finasteride: 247.4±92.1 vs. test:  40.47±93.1 and doxazosin: 190.3±44.3 vs. test: 188.8±45.6 ng.h.mL-1), and Cmax (finasteride: 34.2±7.1 vs. test: 29.9±6.2 and doxazosin: 16.3±3.6 vs. test: 14.9±3.3 ng/mL). The mean ratios of AUC0-72h/AUC0-∞ for finasteride and doxazosin were 99.99% and 99.98%, respectively, indicating that the sampling time was adequate for both drugs. In summary, the current pharmacokinetic study demonstrated bioequivalence between the single agents and the corresponding agents in combination and provided further evidence for the lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between finasteride and doxazosin.Brazilian Journals Publicações de Periódicos e Editora Ltda.2023-05-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/article/view/5942910.34119/bjhrv6n2-023Brazilian Journal of Health Review; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023); 8649-8661Brazilian Journal of Health Review; Vol. 6 Núm. 3 (2023); 8649-8661Brazilian Journal of Health Review; v. 6 n. 3 (2023); 8649-86612595-6825reponame:Brazilian Journal of Health Reviewinstname:Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Paraná (FIEP)instacron:BJRHenghttps://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/article/view/59429/43873Guimaraes, Camila LelesGalvinas, Paulo Alexandre RebeloBaratta, Juliana AlmeidaPinto, Guilherme AraújoBrandão, Amanda HayashiSverdloff, CarlosRezende, Vinicius Marcondesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-14T18:00:07Zoai:ojs2.ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br:article/59429Revistahttp://www.brazilianjournals.com/index.php/BJHR/indexPRIhttps://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/oai|| brazilianjhr@gmail.com2595-68252595-6825opendoar:2023-11-14T18:00:07Brazilian Journal of Health Review - Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Paraná (FIEP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pharmacokinetic analysis and bioequivalence of Finasteride and Doxazosin formulated in a single tablet in comparison with the corresponding single agents
title Pharmacokinetic analysis and bioequivalence of Finasteride and Doxazosin formulated in a single tablet in comparison with the corresponding single agents
spellingShingle Pharmacokinetic analysis and bioequivalence of Finasteride and Doxazosin formulated in a single tablet in comparison with the corresponding single agents
Guimaraes, Camila Leles
Doxazosin
Finasteride
pharmacokinetics
benign prostatic hyperplasia
therapeutic equivalence
bioequivalence
title_short Pharmacokinetic analysis and bioequivalence of Finasteride and Doxazosin formulated in a single tablet in comparison with the corresponding single agents
title_full Pharmacokinetic analysis and bioequivalence of Finasteride and Doxazosin formulated in a single tablet in comparison with the corresponding single agents
title_fullStr Pharmacokinetic analysis and bioequivalence of Finasteride and Doxazosin formulated in a single tablet in comparison with the corresponding single agents
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacokinetic analysis and bioequivalence of Finasteride and Doxazosin formulated in a single tablet in comparison with the corresponding single agents
title_sort Pharmacokinetic analysis and bioequivalence of Finasteride and Doxazosin formulated in a single tablet in comparison with the corresponding single agents
author Guimaraes, Camila Leles
author_facet Guimaraes, Camila Leles
Galvinas, Paulo Alexandre Rebelo
Baratta, Juliana Almeida
Pinto, Guilherme Araújo
Brandão, Amanda Hayashi
Sverdloff, Carlos
Rezende, Vinicius Marcondes
author_role author
author2 Galvinas, Paulo Alexandre Rebelo
Baratta, Juliana Almeida
Pinto, Guilherme Araújo
Brandão, Amanda Hayashi
Sverdloff, Carlos
Rezende, Vinicius Marcondes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guimaraes, Camila Leles
Galvinas, Paulo Alexandre Rebelo
Baratta, Juliana Almeida
Pinto, Guilherme Araújo
Brandão, Amanda Hayashi
Sverdloff, Carlos
Rezende, Vinicius Marcondes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Doxazosin
Finasteride
pharmacokinetics
benign prostatic hyperplasia
therapeutic equivalence
bioequivalence
topic Doxazosin
Finasteride
pharmacokinetics
benign prostatic hyperplasia
therapeutic equivalence
bioequivalence
description The most commonly agents used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in clinical practice are finasteride and doxazosin employed alone or in combination. Randomized clinical trials have shown that combination therapy with finasteride and doxazosin is superior to finasteride alone or placebo. However, decreased patient compliance may lead to unsatisfactorily therapeutic results. The aim of this study was to assess whether the combined pharmacokinetic profile for both finasteride and doxazosin was not significantly altered when these agents were co-administered, in comparison with their use as single agents. This was a randomized 6 sequences and 3 periods, crossover, comparative study of three medications: finasteride (5 mg), doxazosin (2 mg) (references), and the fixed combination containing 5 mg of finasteride and 2 mg of doxazosin in a single tablet (test). Plasma samples obtained from 30 eligible subjects were analyzed simultaneously for finasteride and doxazosin by HPLC coupled to a LC-MS/MS having cyproterone acetate and terazosin as internal standards. The statistical analysis showed no significant differences for AUC0-72h (finasteride: 245.3±87.8 vs. test: 240.5±93.1 and doxazosin: 183.0±42.9 vs. test: 188.8±45.6 ng.h.mL-1), AUC0-∞ (finasteride: 247.4±92.1 vs. test:  40.47±93.1 and doxazosin: 190.3±44.3 vs. test: 188.8±45.6 ng.h.mL-1), and Cmax (finasteride: 34.2±7.1 vs. test: 29.9±6.2 and doxazosin: 16.3±3.6 vs. test: 14.9±3.3 ng/mL). The mean ratios of AUC0-72h/AUC0-∞ for finasteride and doxazosin were 99.99% and 99.98%, respectively, indicating that the sampling time was adequate for both drugs. In summary, the current pharmacokinetic study demonstrated bioequivalence between the single agents and the corresponding agents in combination and provided further evidence for the lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between finasteride and doxazosin.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/article/view/59429
10.34119/bjhrv6n2-023
url https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/article/view/59429
identifier_str_mv 10.34119/bjhrv6n2-023
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/article/view/59429/43873
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journals Publicações de Periódicos e Editora Ltda.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journals Publicações de Periódicos e Editora Ltda.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Health Review; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023); 8649-8661
Brazilian Journal of Health Review; Vol. 6 Núm. 3 (2023); 8649-8661
Brazilian Journal of Health Review; v. 6 n. 3 (2023); 8649-8661
2595-6825
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Health Review
instname:Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Paraná (FIEP)
instacron:BJRH
instname_str Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Paraná (FIEP)
instacron_str BJRH
institution BJRH
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Health Review
collection Brazilian Journal of Health Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Health Review - Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Paraná (FIEP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv || brazilianjhr@gmail.com
_version_ 1797240029008887808