Antimicrobial resistance in respiratory pathogens isolated in Brazil during 1999-2000
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2001 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702001000600002 |
Resumo: | The in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of the respiratory pathogens Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis to commonly tested and prescribed agents was investigated during 1999-2000 and compared with results obtained during a previous 1997-1998 study. Of 448 isolates of S. pneumoniae collected and tested in 1999-2000, 77.2% were susceptible, 19.9% were intermediate, and 2.9% were resistant to penicillin, demonstrating that there were no major changes in susceptibility to penicillin from 1997-1998 (77.1% susceptible, 18.7% intermediate, 4.2% resistant). All S. pneumoniae isolates from 1999-2000 were susceptible to levofloxacin and vancomycin, and >90% were susceptible to the beta-lactams (amoxicillin-clavulanate, ceftriaxone, and cefuroxime) and macrolides (azithromycin and clarithromycin), showing that susceptibility to these agents also remained unchanged since 1997-1998. The most notable increase in resistance between the two studies was demonstrated by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, which increased from 23.4% to 38.6%. Penicillin resistance correlated with resistance to beta-lactams, macrolides, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in both studies. In H. influenzae, the prevalence of beta-lactamase-producing isolates remained unchanged (10.6% in 1999-2000; 11.0% in 1997-1998). All H. influenzae isolates were susceptible to levofloxacin, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, and azithromycin, and showed no change between the two studies. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance was present in 40.1% of isolates in 1999-2000, and in 45.2% in 1997-1998. In M. catarrhalis, the prevalence of beta-lactamase-producing isolates was unchanged (97.9% in 1999-2000; 98.0% in 1997-1998). The most active agents against M. catarrhalis were azithromycin (MIC90, <0.03 mug/ml) and levofloxacin (MIC90, 0.03 mug/ml). Overall, these results suggest that, in Brazil, between 1999-2000 and 1997-1998, there have been no significant changes in the susceptibility of respiratory pathogens to any of the commonly tested and prescribed agents with the exception of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for S. pneumoniae. |
id |
BSID-1_1417a8da5e44e69c0f5a4ae322dd6d92 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1413-86702001000600002 |
network_acronym_str |
BSID-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Antimicrobial resistance in respiratory pathogens isolated in Brazil during 1999-2000Streptococcus pneumoniaeantimicrobial resistancesurveillance studyrespiratory pathogenThe in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of the respiratory pathogens Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis to commonly tested and prescribed agents was investigated during 1999-2000 and compared with results obtained during a previous 1997-1998 study. Of 448 isolates of S. pneumoniae collected and tested in 1999-2000, 77.2% were susceptible, 19.9% were intermediate, and 2.9% were resistant to penicillin, demonstrating that there were no major changes in susceptibility to penicillin from 1997-1998 (77.1% susceptible, 18.7% intermediate, 4.2% resistant). All S. pneumoniae isolates from 1999-2000 were susceptible to levofloxacin and vancomycin, and >90% were susceptible to the beta-lactams (amoxicillin-clavulanate, ceftriaxone, and cefuroxime) and macrolides (azithromycin and clarithromycin), showing that susceptibility to these agents also remained unchanged since 1997-1998. The most notable increase in resistance between the two studies was demonstrated by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, which increased from 23.4% to 38.6%. Penicillin resistance correlated with resistance to beta-lactams, macrolides, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in both studies. In H. influenzae, the prevalence of beta-lactamase-producing isolates remained unchanged (10.6% in 1999-2000; 11.0% in 1997-1998). All H. influenzae isolates were susceptible to levofloxacin, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, and azithromycin, and showed no change between the two studies. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance was present in 40.1% of isolates in 1999-2000, and in 45.2% in 1997-1998. In M. catarrhalis, the prevalence of beta-lactamase-producing isolates was unchanged (97.9% in 1999-2000; 98.0% in 1997-1998). The most active agents against M. catarrhalis were azithromycin (MIC90, <0.03 mug/ml) and levofloxacin (MIC90, 0.03 mug/ml). Overall, these results suggest that, in Brazil, between 1999-2000 and 1997-1998, there have been no significant changes in the susceptibility of respiratory pathogens to any of the commonly tested and prescribed agents with the exception of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for S. pneumoniae.Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases2001-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702001000600002Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases v.5 n.6 2001reponame:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseasesinstname:Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)instacron:BSID10.1590/S1413-86702001000600002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCritchley,Ian A.Blosser,Renée S.Karlowsky,James A.Yamakita,JuriBarth,AlfonsoSader,Helio S.Mendes,CaioTeixeira,LuciaRossi,FlaviaDias,Cicero A. C.Jones,Mark E.Thornsberry,ClydeSahm,Daniel F.eng2003-02-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-86702001000600002Revistahttps://www.bjid.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjid@bjid.org.br||lgoldani@ufrgs.br1678-43911413-8670opendoar:2003-02-21T00:00Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases - Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Antimicrobial resistance in respiratory pathogens isolated in Brazil during 1999-2000 |
title |
Antimicrobial resistance in respiratory pathogens isolated in Brazil during 1999-2000 |
spellingShingle |
Antimicrobial resistance in respiratory pathogens isolated in Brazil during 1999-2000 Critchley,Ian A. Streptococcus pneumoniae antimicrobial resistance surveillance study respiratory pathogen |
title_short |
Antimicrobial resistance in respiratory pathogens isolated in Brazil during 1999-2000 |
title_full |
Antimicrobial resistance in respiratory pathogens isolated in Brazil during 1999-2000 |
title_fullStr |
Antimicrobial resistance in respiratory pathogens isolated in Brazil during 1999-2000 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antimicrobial resistance in respiratory pathogens isolated in Brazil during 1999-2000 |
title_sort |
Antimicrobial resistance in respiratory pathogens isolated in Brazil during 1999-2000 |
author |
Critchley,Ian A. |
author_facet |
Critchley,Ian A. Blosser,Renée S. Karlowsky,James A. Yamakita,Juri Barth,Alfonso Sader,Helio S. Mendes,Caio Teixeira,Lucia Rossi,Flavia Dias,Cicero A. C. Jones,Mark E. Thornsberry,Clyde Sahm,Daniel F. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Blosser,Renée S. Karlowsky,James A. Yamakita,Juri Barth,Alfonso Sader,Helio S. Mendes,Caio Teixeira,Lucia Rossi,Flavia Dias,Cicero A. C. Jones,Mark E. Thornsberry,Clyde Sahm,Daniel F. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Critchley,Ian A. Blosser,Renée S. Karlowsky,James A. Yamakita,Juri Barth,Alfonso Sader,Helio S. Mendes,Caio Teixeira,Lucia Rossi,Flavia Dias,Cicero A. C. Jones,Mark E. Thornsberry,Clyde Sahm,Daniel F. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Streptococcus pneumoniae antimicrobial resistance surveillance study respiratory pathogen |
topic |
Streptococcus pneumoniae antimicrobial resistance surveillance study respiratory pathogen |
description |
The in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of the respiratory pathogens Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis to commonly tested and prescribed agents was investigated during 1999-2000 and compared with results obtained during a previous 1997-1998 study. Of 448 isolates of S. pneumoniae collected and tested in 1999-2000, 77.2% were susceptible, 19.9% were intermediate, and 2.9% were resistant to penicillin, demonstrating that there were no major changes in susceptibility to penicillin from 1997-1998 (77.1% susceptible, 18.7% intermediate, 4.2% resistant). All S. pneumoniae isolates from 1999-2000 were susceptible to levofloxacin and vancomycin, and >90% were susceptible to the beta-lactams (amoxicillin-clavulanate, ceftriaxone, and cefuroxime) and macrolides (azithromycin and clarithromycin), showing that susceptibility to these agents also remained unchanged since 1997-1998. The most notable increase in resistance between the two studies was demonstrated by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, which increased from 23.4% to 38.6%. Penicillin resistance correlated with resistance to beta-lactams, macrolides, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in both studies. In H. influenzae, the prevalence of beta-lactamase-producing isolates remained unchanged (10.6% in 1999-2000; 11.0% in 1997-1998). All H. influenzae isolates were susceptible to levofloxacin, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, and azithromycin, and showed no change between the two studies. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance was present in 40.1% of isolates in 1999-2000, and in 45.2% in 1997-1998. In M. catarrhalis, the prevalence of beta-lactamase-producing isolates was unchanged (97.9% in 1999-2000; 98.0% in 1997-1998). The most active agents against M. catarrhalis were azithromycin (MIC90, <0.03 mug/ml) and levofloxacin (MIC90, 0.03 mug/ml). Overall, these results suggest that, in Brazil, between 1999-2000 and 1997-1998, there have been no significant changes in the susceptibility of respiratory pathogens to any of the commonly tested and prescribed agents with the exception of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for S. pneumoniae. |
publishDate |
2001 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2001-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702001000600002 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702001000600002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1413-86702001000600002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases v.5 n.6 2001 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases instname:Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID) instacron:BSID |
instname_str |
Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID) |
instacron_str |
BSID |
institution |
BSID |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases - Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjid@bjid.org.br||lgoldani@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1754209238231547904 |