Using pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin to treat chronic hepatitis patients infected with hepatitis c virus genotype 1: are nonresponders and relapsers different populations?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Giovanni Faria
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Polônio,Rodrigo José, Pardini,Maria Inês Moura Campos, Corvino,Silvia Maria, Henriques,Rita Maria Saccomano, Peres,Mari Nilce, Coelho,Kunie Iabuki Rabello
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702007000600006
Resumo: The combination of pegylated interferon (PEG-INF) and ribavirin is currently the best treatment for chronic hepatitis C, providing a sustained virological response (SVR) in 54%-63% of patients. In patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1, the SVR rate is 42%-52%. To evaluate the treatment efficacy of this drug combination, we conducted an open, prospective study of 58 consecutive treatment-naïve patients infected with HCV genotype 1 and treated at a university hospital, comparing those presenting an SVR (SVRs), nonresponders (NRs), and relapsers (RELs). Among the intent-to-treat patients, an end-of-treatment virological response was achieved in 69% of the sample as a whole and in 52% of the SVRs. We found that being an SVR was significantly associated with mild fibrosis (p = 0.04) and with undetectable HCV RNA at weeks 12 and 24 of treatment (p < 0.0001). Comparing the SVR and REL groups, we observed that being older than 40 was significantly associated with being a REL (p = 0.04). Being an NR was found to be associated with severe fibrosis and moderate inflammatory infiltrates (portal or periportal). In the polytomous logistic regression, no independent factors were associated with the REL group when compared with the SVR group. We conclude that RELs and NRs differ in comparison with SVRs. The RELs accounted for 17% of the sample. The HCV RNA test results at weeks 12 and 24 of treatment, although independent predictors of non-response (OR: 4.8 and 8.2, respectively), did not differ between SVRs and RELs.
id BSID-1_6edc9907dcb0dcddaf1d851b45015d1c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-86702007000600006
network_acronym_str BSID-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
repository_id_str
spelling Using pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin to treat chronic hepatitis patients infected with hepatitis c virus genotype 1: are nonresponders and relapsers different populations?Hepatitis Cpegylated interferon alfa 2bgenotype 1relapsersThe combination of pegylated interferon (PEG-INF) and ribavirin is currently the best treatment for chronic hepatitis C, providing a sustained virological response (SVR) in 54%-63% of patients. In patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1, the SVR rate is 42%-52%. To evaluate the treatment efficacy of this drug combination, we conducted an open, prospective study of 58 consecutive treatment-naïve patients infected with HCV genotype 1 and treated at a university hospital, comparing those presenting an SVR (SVRs), nonresponders (NRs), and relapsers (RELs). Among the intent-to-treat patients, an end-of-treatment virological response was achieved in 69% of the sample as a whole and in 52% of the SVRs. We found that being an SVR was significantly associated with mild fibrosis (p = 0.04) and with undetectable HCV RNA at weeks 12 and 24 of treatment (p < 0.0001). Comparing the SVR and REL groups, we observed that being older than 40 was significantly associated with being a REL (p = 0.04). Being an NR was found to be associated with severe fibrosis and moderate inflammatory infiltrates (portal or periportal). In the polytomous logistic regression, no independent factors were associated with the REL group when compared with the SVR group. We conclude that RELs and NRs differ in comparison with SVRs. The RELs accounted for 17% of the sample. The HCV RNA test results at weeks 12 and 24 of treatment, although independent predictors of non-response (OR: 4.8 and 8.2, respectively), did not differ between SVRs and RELs.Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases2007-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702007000600006Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases v.11 n.6 2007reponame:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseasesinstname:Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)instacron:BSID10.1590/S1413-86702007000600006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Giovanni FariaPolônio,Rodrigo JoséPardini,Maria Inês Moura CamposCorvino,Silvia MariaHenriques,Rita Maria SaccomanoPeres,Mari NilceCoelho,Kunie Iabuki Rabelloeng2008-02-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-86702007000600006Revistahttps://www.bjid.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjid@bjid.org.br||lgoldani@ufrgs.br1678-43911413-8670opendoar:2008-02-27T00:00Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases - Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Using pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin to treat chronic hepatitis patients infected with hepatitis c virus genotype 1: are nonresponders and relapsers different populations?
title Using pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin to treat chronic hepatitis patients infected with hepatitis c virus genotype 1: are nonresponders and relapsers different populations?
spellingShingle Using pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin to treat chronic hepatitis patients infected with hepatitis c virus genotype 1: are nonresponders and relapsers different populations?
Silva,Giovanni Faria
Hepatitis C
pegylated interferon alfa 2b
genotype 1
relapsers
title_short Using pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin to treat chronic hepatitis patients infected with hepatitis c virus genotype 1: are nonresponders and relapsers different populations?
title_full Using pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin to treat chronic hepatitis patients infected with hepatitis c virus genotype 1: are nonresponders and relapsers different populations?
title_fullStr Using pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin to treat chronic hepatitis patients infected with hepatitis c virus genotype 1: are nonresponders and relapsers different populations?
title_full_unstemmed Using pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin to treat chronic hepatitis patients infected with hepatitis c virus genotype 1: are nonresponders and relapsers different populations?
title_sort Using pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin to treat chronic hepatitis patients infected with hepatitis c virus genotype 1: are nonresponders and relapsers different populations?
author Silva,Giovanni Faria
author_facet Silva,Giovanni Faria
Polônio,Rodrigo José
Pardini,Maria Inês Moura Campos
Corvino,Silvia Maria
Henriques,Rita Maria Saccomano
Peres,Mari Nilce
Coelho,Kunie Iabuki Rabello
author_role author
author2 Polônio,Rodrigo José
Pardini,Maria Inês Moura Campos
Corvino,Silvia Maria
Henriques,Rita Maria Saccomano
Peres,Mari Nilce
Coelho,Kunie Iabuki Rabello
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Giovanni Faria
Polônio,Rodrigo José
Pardini,Maria Inês Moura Campos
Corvino,Silvia Maria
Henriques,Rita Maria Saccomano
Peres,Mari Nilce
Coelho,Kunie Iabuki Rabello
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hepatitis C
pegylated interferon alfa 2b
genotype 1
relapsers
topic Hepatitis C
pegylated interferon alfa 2b
genotype 1
relapsers
description The combination of pegylated interferon (PEG-INF) and ribavirin is currently the best treatment for chronic hepatitis C, providing a sustained virological response (SVR) in 54%-63% of patients. In patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1, the SVR rate is 42%-52%. To evaluate the treatment efficacy of this drug combination, we conducted an open, prospective study of 58 consecutive treatment-naïve patients infected with HCV genotype 1 and treated at a university hospital, comparing those presenting an SVR (SVRs), nonresponders (NRs), and relapsers (RELs). Among the intent-to-treat patients, an end-of-treatment virological response was achieved in 69% of the sample as a whole and in 52% of the SVRs. We found that being an SVR was significantly associated with mild fibrosis (p = 0.04) and with undetectable HCV RNA at weeks 12 and 24 of treatment (p < 0.0001). Comparing the SVR and REL groups, we observed that being older than 40 was significantly associated with being a REL (p = 0.04). Being an NR was found to be associated with severe fibrosis and moderate inflammatory infiltrates (portal or periportal). In the polytomous logistic regression, no independent factors were associated with the REL group when compared with the SVR group. We conclude that RELs and NRs differ in comparison with SVRs. The RELs accounted for 17% of the sample. The HCV RNA test results at weeks 12 and 24 of treatment, although independent predictors of non-response (OR: 4.8 and 8.2, respectively), did not differ between SVRs and RELs.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702007000600006
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702007000600006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1413-86702007000600006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases v.11 n.6 2007
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
instname:Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)
instacron:BSID
instname_str Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)
instacron_str BSID
institution BSID
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
collection Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases - Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjid@bjid.org.br||lgoldani@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1754209240200773632