Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702009000200014 |
Resumo: | We compared the pp65 antigen detection by an in house method (immunoperoxidase assay) and by a commercial kit (immunofluorescence assay) available for cytomegalovirus infection diagnosis in immunocompromised patients. Sixty-four blood samples were analyzed in duplicate for both techniques. Eight-six percent of the samples had concordant qualitative results. The discordant results occurred more frequently in samples with low quantity of positive cells. There were no significant differences with qualitative and quantitative results of the methods. |
id |
BSID-1_c5ae1d29d59a6d7ef2226d04cc085b4b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1413-86702009000200014 |
network_acronym_str |
BSID-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patientsImmunoperoxidaseimmunofluorescencecytomegalovirusimmunocompromised patientsbone marrow transplantationsolid organ transplantWe compared the pp65 antigen detection by an in house method (immunoperoxidase assay) and by a commercial kit (immunofluorescence assay) available for cytomegalovirus infection diagnosis in immunocompromised patients. Sixty-four blood samples were analyzed in duplicate for both techniques. Eight-six percent of the samples had concordant qualitative results. The discordant results occurred more frequently in samples with low quantity of positive cells. There were no significant differences with qualitative and quantitative results of the methods.Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases2009-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702009000200014Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases v.13 n.2 2009reponame:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseasesinstname:Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)instacron:BSID10.1590/S1413-86702009000200014info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDebur,Maria do CarmoVidal,Luine R. RoseleNogueira,Meri BordignonPereira,Luciane AparecidaTakahashi,Gislene R.A.Rotta,IndianaraAlmeida,Sérgio Monteiro deRaboni,Sonia Maraeng2010-01-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-86702009000200014Revistahttps://www.bjid.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjid@bjid.org.br||lgoldani@ufrgs.br1678-43911413-8670opendoar:2010-01-29T00:00Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases - Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients |
title |
Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients Debur,Maria do Carmo Immunoperoxidase immunofluorescence cytomegalovirus immunocompromised patients bone marrow transplantation solid organ transplant |
title_short |
Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients |
title_full |
Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients |
title_sort |
Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients |
author |
Debur,Maria do Carmo |
author_facet |
Debur,Maria do Carmo Vidal,Luine R. Rosele Nogueira,Meri Bordignon Pereira,Luciane Aparecida Takahashi,Gislene R.A. Rotta,Indianara Almeida,Sérgio Monteiro de Raboni,Sonia Mara |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vidal,Luine R. Rosele Nogueira,Meri Bordignon Pereira,Luciane Aparecida Takahashi,Gislene R.A. Rotta,Indianara Almeida,Sérgio Monteiro de Raboni,Sonia Mara |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Debur,Maria do Carmo Vidal,Luine R. Rosele Nogueira,Meri Bordignon Pereira,Luciane Aparecida Takahashi,Gislene R.A. Rotta,Indianara Almeida,Sérgio Monteiro de Raboni,Sonia Mara |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Immunoperoxidase immunofluorescence cytomegalovirus immunocompromised patients bone marrow transplantation solid organ transplant |
topic |
Immunoperoxidase immunofluorescence cytomegalovirus immunocompromised patients bone marrow transplantation solid organ transplant |
description |
We compared the pp65 antigen detection by an in house method (immunoperoxidase assay) and by a commercial kit (immunofluorescence assay) available for cytomegalovirus infection diagnosis in immunocompromised patients. Sixty-four blood samples were analyzed in duplicate for both techniques. Eight-six percent of the samples had concordant qualitative results. The discordant results occurred more frequently in samples with low quantity of positive cells. There were no significant differences with qualitative and quantitative results of the methods. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702009000200014 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702009000200014 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1413-86702009000200014 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases v.13 n.2 2009 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases instname:Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID) instacron:BSID |
instname_str |
Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID) |
instacron_str |
BSID |
institution |
BSID |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases - Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjid@bjid.org.br||lgoldani@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1754209240718770176 |