Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Debur,Maria do Carmo
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Vidal,Luine R. Rosele, Nogueira,Meri Bordignon, Pereira,Luciane Aparecida, Takahashi,Gislene R.A., Rotta,Indianara, Almeida,Sérgio Monteiro de, Raboni,Sonia Mara
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702009000200014
Resumo: We compared the pp65 antigen detection by an in house method (immunoperoxidase assay) and by a commercial kit (immunofluorescence assay) available for cytomegalovirus infection diagnosis in immunocompromised patients. Sixty-four blood samples were analyzed in duplicate for both techniques. Eight-six percent of the samples had concordant qualitative results. The discordant results occurred more frequently in samples with low quantity of positive cells. There were no significant differences with qualitative and quantitative results of the methods.
id BSID-1_c5ae1d29d59a6d7ef2226d04cc085b4b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-86702009000200014
network_acronym_str BSID-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patientsImmunoperoxidaseimmunofluorescencecytomegalovirusimmunocompromised patientsbone marrow transplantationsolid organ transplantWe compared the pp65 antigen detection by an in house method (immunoperoxidase assay) and by a commercial kit (immunofluorescence assay) available for cytomegalovirus infection diagnosis in immunocompromised patients. Sixty-four blood samples were analyzed in duplicate for both techniques. Eight-six percent of the samples had concordant qualitative results. The discordant results occurred more frequently in samples with low quantity of positive cells. There were no significant differences with qualitative and quantitative results of the methods.Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases2009-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702009000200014Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases v.13 n.2 2009reponame:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseasesinstname:Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)instacron:BSID10.1590/S1413-86702009000200014info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDebur,Maria do CarmoVidal,Luine R. RoseleNogueira,Meri BordignonPereira,Luciane AparecidaTakahashi,Gislene R.A.Rotta,IndianaraAlmeida,Sérgio Monteiro deRaboni,Sonia Maraeng2010-01-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-86702009000200014Revistahttps://www.bjid.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjid@bjid.org.br||lgoldani@ufrgs.br1678-43911413-8670opendoar:2010-01-29T00:00Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases - Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients
title Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients
spellingShingle Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients
Debur,Maria do Carmo
Immunoperoxidase
immunofluorescence
cytomegalovirus
immunocompromised patients
bone marrow transplantation
solid organ transplant
title_short Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients
title_full Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients
title_fullStr Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients
title_sort Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients
author Debur,Maria do Carmo
author_facet Debur,Maria do Carmo
Vidal,Luine R. Rosele
Nogueira,Meri Bordignon
Pereira,Luciane Aparecida
Takahashi,Gislene R.A.
Rotta,Indianara
Almeida,Sérgio Monteiro de
Raboni,Sonia Mara
author_role author
author2 Vidal,Luine R. Rosele
Nogueira,Meri Bordignon
Pereira,Luciane Aparecida
Takahashi,Gislene R.A.
Rotta,Indianara
Almeida,Sérgio Monteiro de
Raboni,Sonia Mara
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Debur,Maria do Carmo
Vidal,Luine R. Rosele
Nogueira,Meri Bordignon
Pereira,Luciane Aparecida
Takahashi,Gislene R.A.
Rotta,Indianara
Almeida,Sérgio Monteiro de
Raboni,Sonia Mara
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Immunoperoxidase
immunofluorescence
cytomegalovirus
immunocompromised patients
bone marrow transplantation
solid organ transplant
topic Immunoperoxidase
immunofluorescence
cytomegalovirus
immunocompromised patients
bone marrow transplantation
solid organ transplant
description We compared the pp65 antigen detection by an in house method (immunoperoxidase assay) and by a commercial kit (immunofluorescence assay) available for cytomegalovirus infection diagnosis in immunocompromised patients. Sixty-four blood samples were analyzed in duplicate for both techniques. Eight-six percent of the samples had concordant qualitative results. The discordant results occurred more frequently in samples with low quantity of positive cells. There were no significant differences with qualitative and quantitative results of the methods.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702009000200014
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702009000200014
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1413-86702009000200014
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases v.13 n.2 2009
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
instname:Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)
instacron:BSID
instname_str Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)
instacron_str BSID
institution BSID
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
collection Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases - Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjid@bjid.org.br||lgoldani@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1754209240718770176