Environmental stratification in cotton in the presence or absence of genotypes with high ecovalence

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Filho,João Luís da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Morello,Camilo de Lelis, Suassuna,Nelson Dias, Farias,Francisco José Correia, Lamas,Fernando Mendes, Pedrosa,Murilo Barros, Ribeiro,José Lopes, Suassuna,Taís de Moraes Falleiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-70332017000100032
Resumo: Abstract Cottonseed yield data of 17 genotypes, of which two genotypes contributed to more than 30% of the total ecovalence, and grown in 23 locations, were used to compare four methods of disjoint environmental stratification: a) environmental index (Ie): favorable or unfavorable environments; b) stratification in partitions that maximize the sum of squares of the genotype x partition interaction [(GP)m]; c) environmental scores of the second principal component of the GGE analysis (PC2-GGE); d) environmental scores of the first principal component of the AMMI analysis (PC1-AMMI). Scenarios were simulated (10,000 simulations per scenario) using combination of nine or 13 environments and 11 genotypes, either including or excluding those with the highest ecovalence values. In all scenarios, the greatest selection gains were obtained via PC2-GGE stratification, and the lowest selection gains were obtained via Ie. The ecovalences of the genotypes influenced the results obtained using the stratification methods.
id CBAB-1_75a8b20c409be78530c70785e39cf618
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1984-70332017000100032
network_acronym_str CBAB-1
network_name_str Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology
repository_id_str
spelling Environmental stratification in cotton in the presence or absence of genotypes with high ecovalenceGossypium hirsutumgenotype x environment interactionAMMI and GGE biplotAbstract Cottonseed yield data of 17 genotypes, of which two genotypes contributed to more than 30% of the total ecovalence, and grown in 23 locations, were used to compare four methods of disjoint environmental stratification: a) environmental index (Ie): favorable or unfavorable environments; b) stratification in partitions that maximize the sum of squares of the genotype x partition interaction [(GP)m]; c) environmental scores of the second principal component of the GGE analysis (PC2-GGE); d) environmental scores of the first principal component of the AMMI analysis (PC1-AMMI). Scenarios were simulated (10,000 simulations per scenario) using combination of nine or 13 environments and 11 genotypes, either including or excluding those with the highest ecovalence values. In all scenarios, the greatest selection gains were obtained via PC2-GGE stratification, and the lowest selection gains were obtained via Ie. The ecovalences of the genotypes influenced the results obtained using the stratification methods.Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology2017-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-70332017000100032Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology v.17 n.1 2017reponame:Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnologyinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Melhoramento de Plantasinstacron:CBAB10.1590/1984-70332017v17n1a5info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFilho,João Luís da SilvaMorello,Camilo de LelisSuassuna,Nelson DiasFarias,Francisco José CorreiaLamas,Fernando MendesPedrosa,Murilo BarrosRibeiro,José LopesSuassuna,Taís de Moraes Falleiroeng2017-02-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1984-70332017000100032Revistahttps://cbab.sbmp.org.br/#ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcbabjournal@gmail.com||cbab@ufv.br1984-70331518-7853opendoar:2017-02-14T00:00Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology - Sociedade Brasileira de Melhoramento de Plantasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Environmental stratification in cotton in the presence or absence of genotypes with high ecovalence
title Environmental stratification in cotton in the presence or absence of genotypes with high ecovalence
spellingShingle Environmental stratification in cotton in the presence or absence of genotypes with high ecovalence
Filho,João Luís da Silva
Gossypium hirsutum
genotype x environment interaction
AMMI and GGE biplot
title_short Environmental stratification in cotton in the presence or absence of genotypes with high ecovalence
title_full Environmental stratification in cotton in the presence or absence of genotypes with high ecovalence
title_fullStr Environmental stratification in cotton in the presence or absence of genotypes with high ecovalence
title_full_unstemmed Environmental stratification in cotton in the presence or absence of genotypes with high ecovalence
title_sort Environmental stratification in cotton in the presence or absence of genotypes with high ecovalence
author Filho,João Luís da Silva
author_facet Filho,João Luís da Silva
Morello,Camilo de Lelis
Suassuna,Nelson Dias
Farias,Francisco José Correia
Lamas,Fernando Mendes
Pedrosa,Murilo Barros
Ribeiro,José Lopes
Suassuna,Taís de Moraes Falleiro
author_role author
author2 Morello,Camilo de Lelis
Suassuna,Nelson Dias
Farias,Francisco José Correia
Lamas,Fernando Mendes
Pedrosa,Murilo Barros
Ribeiro,José Lopes
Suassuna,Taís de Moraes Falleiro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Filho,João Luís da Silva
Morello,Camilo de Lelis
Suassuna,Nelson Dias
Farias,Francisco José Correia
Lamas,Fernando Mendes
Pedrosa,Murilo Barros
Ribeiro,José Lopes
Suassuna,Taís de Moraes Falleiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gossypium hirsutum
genotype x environment interaction
AMMI and GGE biplot
topic Gossypium hirsutum
genotype x environment interaction
AMMI and GGE biplot
description Abstract Cottonseed yield data of 17 genotypes, of which two genotypes contributed to more than 30% of the total ecovalence, and grown in 23 locations, were used to compare four methods of disjoint environmental stratification: a) environmental index (Ie): favorable or unfavorable environments; b) stratification in partitions that maximize the sum of squares of the genotype x partition interaction [(GP)m]; c) environmental scores of the second principal component of the GGE analysis (PC2-GGE); d) environmental scores of the first principal component of the AMMI analysis (PC1-AMMI). Scenarios were simulated (10,000 simulations per scenario) using combination of nine or 13 environments and 11 genotypes, either including or excluding those with the highest ecovalence values. In all scenarios, the greatest selection gains were obtained via PC2-GGE stratification, and the lowest selection gains were obtained via Ie. The ecovalences of the genotypes influenced the results obtained using the stratification methods.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-70332017000100032
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-70332017000100032
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1984-70332017v17n1a5
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology v.17 n.1 2017
reponame:Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Melhoramento de Plantas
instacron:CBAB
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Melhoramento de Plantas
instacron_str CBAB
institution CBAB
reponame_str Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology
collection Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology - Sociedade Brasileira de Melhoramento de Plantas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cbabjournal@gmail.com||cbab@ufv.br
_version_ 1754209187175333888