Should splenic autotransplantation be considered after total splenectomy due to trauma?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912018000300300 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Trauma is a public health problem and the most common cause of death in people under the age of 45. In blunt abdominal trauma, the spleen is the most commonly injured organ. Splenectomy remains the most common treatment, especially in high-grade lesions, despite increased nonoperative treatment. Removal of the spleen leads to increased susceptibility to infections due to its role in the immune function. Postsplenectomy sepsis is an important complication and presents a high mortality rate. Patients undergoing splenectomy should be immunized for encapsulated germs, as these are the agents most commonly associated with such infections. Splenic autotransplantation is a simple procedure, which can be an alternative to reduce infection rates consequent to total splenectomy, and reduce costs related to hospitalizations. This review aims to provide evidence-based information on splenic autotransplantation and its impact on the prognosis of patients undergoing total splenectomy. We searched the Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed, SciELO and Embase, from January 2017 to January 2018 and selected articles in English and Portuguese, dated from 1919 to 2017. We found that the adjusted risk of death in splenectomized patients is greater than that of the general population, and when total splenectomy is performed, splenic autotransplantation is the only method capable of preserving splenic function, avoiding infections, especially postsplenectomy sepsis. Health professionals should be familiar with the consequences of the method chosen to manage the patient suffering from splenic trauma. |
id |
CBC-1_55d8cb183091fbf5193c2432cb10e9d0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-69912018000300300 |
network_acronym_str |
CBC-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Should splenic autotransplantation be considered after total splenectomy due to trauma?Trauma and Stressor Related DisordersSpleenSplenectomySepsisTransplantation, Autologous.ABSTRACT Trauma is a public health problem and the most common cause of death in people under the age of 45. In blunt abdominal trauma, the spleen is the most commonly injured organ. Splenectomy remains the most common treatment, especially in high-grade lesions, despite increased nonoperative treatment. Removal of the spleen leads to increased susceptibility to infections due to its role in the immune function. Postsplenectomy sepsis is an important complication and presents a high mortality rate. Patients undergoing splenectomy should be immunized for encapsulated germs, as these are the agents most commonly associated with such infections. Splenic autotransplantation is a simple procedure, which can be an alternative to reduce infection rates consequent to total splenectomy, and reduce costs related to hospitalizations. This review aims to provide evidence-based information on splenic autotransplantation and its impact on the prognosis of patients undergoing total splenectomy. We searched the Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed, SciELO and Embase, from January 2017 to January 2018 and selected articles in English and Portuguese, dated from 1919 to 2017. We found that the adjusted risk of death in splenectomized patients is greater than that of the general population, and when total splenectomy is performed, splenic autotransplantation is the only method capable of preserving splenic function, avoiding infections, especially postsplenectomy sepsis. Health professionals should be familiar with the consequences of the method chosen to manage the patient suffering from splenic trauma.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912018000300300Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.45 n.3 2018reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiõesinstname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)instacron:CBC10.1590/0100-6991e-20181850info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCARDOSO,DANIEL LINHARESCARDOSO FILHO,FLORENTINO DE ARAÚJOCARDOSO,AMANDA LINHARESGONZAGA,MARCELO LIMAGRANDE,ANTÔNIO JOSÉeng2018-07-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69912018000300300Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rcbcONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacbc@cbc.org.br1809-45460100-6991opendoar:2018-07-04T00:00Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Should splenic autotransplantation be considered after total splenectomy due to trauma? |
title |
Should splenic autotransplantation be considered after total splenectomy due to trauma? |
spellingShingle |
Should splenic autotransplantation be considered after total splenectomy due to trauma? CARDOSO,DANIEL LINHARES Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders Spleen Splenectomy Sepsis Transplantation, Autologous. |
title_short |
Should splenic autotransplantation be considered after total splenectomy due to trauma? |
title_full |
Should splenic autotransplantation be considered after total splenectomy due to trauma? |
title_fullStr |
Should splenic autotransplantation be considered after total splenectomy due to trauma? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Should splenic autotransplantation be considered after total splenectomy due to trauma? |
title_sort |
Should splenic autotransplantation be considered after total splenectomy due to trauma? |
author |
CARDOSO,DANIEL LINHARES |
author_facet |
CARDOSO,DANIEL LINHARES CARDOSO FILHO,FLORENTINO DE ARAÚJO CARDOSO,AMANDA LINHARES GONZAGA,MARCELO LIMA GRANDE,ANTÔNIO JOSÉ |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
CARDOSO FILHO,FLORENTINO DE ARAÚJO CARDOSO,AMANDA LINHARES GONZAGA,MARCELO LIMA GRANDE,ANTÔNIO JOSÉ |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
CARDOSO,DANIEL LINHARES CARDOSO FILHO,FLORENTINO DE ARAÚJO CARDOSO,AMANDA LINHARES GONZAGA,MARCELO LIMA GRANDE,ANTÔNIO JOSÉ |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders Spleen Splenectomy Sepsis Transplantation, Autologous. |
topic |
Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders Spleen Splenectomy Sepsis Transplantation, Autologous. |
description |
ABSTRACT Trauma is a public health problem and the most common cause of death in people under the age of 45. In blunt abdominal trauma, the spleen is the most commonly injured organ. Splenectomy remains the most common treatment, especially in high-grade lesions, despite increased nonoperative treatment. Removal of the spleen leads to increased susceptibility to infections due to its role in the immune function. Postsplenectomy sepsis is an important complication and presents a high mortality rate. Patients undergoing splenectomy should be immunized for encapsulated germs, as these are the agents most commonly associated with such infections. Splenic autotransplantation is a simple procedure, which can be an alternative to reduce infection rates consequent to total splenectomy, and reduce costs related to hospitalizations. This review aims to provide evidence-based information on splenic autotransplantation and its impact on the prognosis of patients undergoing total splenectomy. We searched the Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed, SciELO and Embase, from January 2017 to January 2018 and selected articles in English and Portuguese, dated from 1919 to 2017. We found that the adjusted risk of death in splenectomized patients is greater than that of the general population, and when total splenectomy is performed, splenic autotransplantation is the only method capable of preserving splenic function, avoiding infections, especially postsplenectomy sepsis. Health professionals should be familiar with the consequences of the method chosen to manage the patient suffering from splenic trauma. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912018000300300 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912018000300300 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-6991e-20181850 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.45 n.3 2018 reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) instacron:CBC |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) |
instacron_str |
CBC |
institution |
CBC |
reponame_str |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
collection |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacbc@cbc.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209214148902912 |