Comparison between electrocautery and fibrin selant after hepatectomy in rats
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912014000300198 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To compare between electrocautery and fibrin sealant hemostasis in rats after partial hepatectomy.METHODS: we used 24 Wistar rats, which were submitted to 30% hepatic resection, divided into two groups of 12 animals each: Group Electrocautery and Group Tachosil(r). These animals were evaluated after three and 14 days. We assessed the presence of complications, laboratory tests and histological exam of the recovered liver.RESULTS: the presence of abscess was more prevalent in the electrocautery group. The observed adhesions were more pronounced in the electrocautery group, both in frequency and in intensity, after three and 14 days. There were no deaths in either group. As for laboratory analysis, after three days the hematocrit was lower in the TachoSil(r) Group. The elevation of AST and ALT were more pronounced in the electrocautery group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.004) in three days. Histological analysis of specimens collected on the third day after surgery showed similar results in both groups for the presence of polymorphonuclear cells, whereas mononuclear was more evident in the TachoSil(r) group. We also observed that angiogenesis, although present in both groups, was more pronounced in the TachoSil(r) group (p = 0.030). However, on the 14th day angiogenesis was more pronounced in the electrocautery group, but without statistical significance.CONCLUSION: hemostasis achieved by the groups was similar; however, the use of electrocautery was associated with infections, adhesions at higher grades and elevated liver enzymes. |
id |
CBC-1_97d42fa91e655fc49629b1449a424538 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-69912014000300198 |
network_acronym_str |
CBC-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison between electrocautery and fibrin selant after hepatectomy in ratsHepatectomyRatsElectrocoagulationFibrinOBJECTIVE: To compare between electrocautery and fibrin sealant hemostasis in rats after partial hepatectomy.METHODS: we used 24 Wistar rats, which were submitted to 30% hepatic resection, divided into two groups of 12 animals each: Group Electrocautery and Group Tachosil(r). These animals were evaluated after three and 14 days. We assessed the presence of complications, laboratory tests and histological exam of the recovered liver.RESULTS: the presence of abscess was more prevalent in the electrocautery group. The observed adhesions were more pronounced in the electrocautery group, both in frequency and in intensity, after three and 14 days. There were no deaths in either group. As for laboratory analysis, after three days the hematocrit was lower in the TachoSil(r) Group. The elevation of AST and ALT were more pronounced in the electrocautery group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.004) in three days. Histological analysis of specimens collected on the third day after surgery showed similar results in both groups for the presence of polymorphonuclear cells, whereas mononuclear was more evident in the TachoSil(r) group. We also observed that angiogenesis, although present in both groups, was more pronounced in the TachoSil(r) group (p = 0.030). However, on the 14th day angiogenesis was more pronounced in the electrocautery group, but without statistical significance.CONCLUSION: hemostasis achieved by the groups was similar; however, the use of electrocautery was associated with infections, adhesions at higher grades and elevated liver enzymes.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões2014-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912014000300198Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.41 n.3 2014reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiõesinstname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)instacron:CBC10.1590/S0100-69912014000300011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoutinho,Tâmara Rúbia Cavalcante GuimarãesMalafaia,OsvaldoTorres,Orlando Jorge MartinsRibas Filho,Jurandir MarcondesKaminski,Alvaro FonsecaCella,Igor FurlanJurkonis,Leandro Bressianinieng2015-09-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69912014000300198Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rcbcONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacbc@cbc.org.br1809-45460100-6991opendoar:2015-09-25T00:00Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison between electrocautery and fibrin selant after hepatectomy in rats |
title |
Comparison between electrocautery and fibrin selant after hepatectomy in rats |
spellingShingle |
Comparison between electrocautery and fibrin selant after hepatectomy in rats Coutinho,Tâmara Rúbia Cavalcante Guimarães Hepatectomy Rats Electrocoagulation Fibrin |
title_short |
Comparison between electrocautery and fibrin selant after hepatectomy in rats |
title_full |
Comparison between electrocautery and fibrin selant after hepatectomy in rats |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between electrocautery and fibrin selant after hepatectomy in rats |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between electrocautery and fibrin selant after hepatectomy in rats |
title_sort |
Comparison between electrocautery and fibrin selant after hepatectomy in rats |
author |
Coutinho,Tâmara Rúbia Cavalcante Guimarães |
author_facet |
Coutinho,Tâmara Rúbia Cavalcante Guimarães Malafaia,Osvaldo Torres,Orlando Jorge Martins Ribas Filho,Jurandir Marcondes Kaminski,Alvaro Fonseca Cella,Igor Furlan Jurkonis,Leandro Bressianini |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Malafaia,Osvaldo Torres,Orlando Jorge Martins Ribas Filho,Jurandir Marcondes Kaminski,Alvaro Fonseca Cella,Igor Furlan Jurkonis,Leandro Bressianini |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Coutinho,Tâmara Rúbia Cavalcante Guimarães Malafaia,Osvaldo Torres,Orlando Jorge Martins Ribas Filho,Jurandir Marcondes Kaminski,Alvaro Fonseca Cella,Igor Furlan Jurkonis,Leandro Bressianini |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hepatectomy Rats Electrocoagulation Fibrin |
topic |
Hepatectomy Rats Electrocoagulation Fibrin |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To compare between electrocautery and fibrin sealant hemostasis in rats after partial hepatectomy.METHODS: we used 24 Wistar rats, which were submitted to 30% hepatic resection, divided into two groups of 12 animals each: Group Electrocautery and Group Tachosil(r). These animals were evaluated after three and 14 days. We assessed the presence of complications, laboratory tests and histological exam of the recovered liver.RESULTS: the presence of abscess was more prevalent in the electrocautery group. The observed adhesions were more pronounced in the electrocautery group, both in frequency and in intensity, after three and 14 days. There were no deaths in either group. As for laboratory analysis, after three days the hematocrit was lower in the TachoSil(r) Group. The elevation of AST and ALT were more pronounced in the electrocautery group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.004) in three days. Histological analysis of specimens collected on the third day after surgery showed similar results in both groups for the presence of polymorphonuclear cells, whereas mononuclear was more evident in the TachoSil(r) group. We also observed that angiogenesis, although present in both groups, was more pronounced in the TachoSil(r) group (p = 0.030). However, on the 14th day angiogenesis was more pronounced in the electrocautery group, but without statistical significance.CONCLUSION: hemostasis achieved by the groups was similar; however, the use of electrocautery was associated with infections, adhesions at higher grades and elevated liver enzymes. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912014000300198 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912014000300198 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0100-69912014000300011 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.41 n.3 2014 reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) instacron:CBC |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) |
instacron_str |
CBC |
institution |
CBC |
reponame_str |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
collection |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacbc@cbc.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209212691382272 |