Safety and efficacy of roux-en-y gastric bypass in older aged patients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: QUINTERO,JORGE HUMBERTO RODRIGUEZ
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: GROSSER,RACHEL, VELEZ,GUSTAVO ROMERO, RAMOS-SANTILLAN,VICENTE OMAR, PEREIRA,XAVIER, FLORES,FERNANDO MUÑOZ, CHOI,JENNY, MORAN-ATKIN,ERIN, CAMACHO,DIEGO, LIMA,DIEGO LAURENTINO
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912022000100242
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction: laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) has been a revolutionary intervention for weight loss with reduction of up to 60-70% of excess body weight. However, these outcomes are not as well validated at the extremes of age, where the safety of the intervention still has some caveats. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of primary LRYGB among different age groups. Methods: the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent primary LRYGB from January 2014 to December 2017 at a single institution. Four groups were created and compared by dividing our sample by age quartiles. The primary outcome was percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 year. Additional operative outcomes and complications were also compared across groups. Results: a total of 1013 patients underwent non-revisional LRYGB during the study period. Mean %EWL at one year was 55%. When compared between quartiles, there was a statistically significant difference in %EWL: 1st 62%, 2nd 57%, 3rd 54% and 4th 47% (p=0.010). The differences in the secondary outcomes between age groups did not demonstrate statistical significance. Conclusions: though patients in the fourth age quartile (range) did not demonstrate a statistically significant increase in adverse outcomes, they did lose less weight compared to other cohorts. The %EWL at one year after RYGB varied by age in our cohort. Goals after bariatric surgery should be individualized as weight loss is less robust with aging.
id CBC-1_acbf8d553716bac4006f3696294a3b56
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-69912022000100242
network_acronym_str CBC-1
network_name_str Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
repository_id_str
spelling Safety and efficacy of roux-en-y gastric bypass in older aged patientsGastric BypassBariatric SurgeryAnastomosis, Roux-en-YABSTRACT Introduction: laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) has been a revolutionary intervention for weight loss with reduction of up to 60-70% of excess body weight. However, these outcomes are not as well validated at the extremes of age, where the safety of the intervention still has some caveats. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of primary LRYGB among different age groups. Methods: the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent primary LRYGB from January 2014 to December 2017 at a single institution. Four groups were created and compared by dividing our sample by age quartiles. The primary outcome was percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 year. Additional operative outcomes and complications were also compared across groups. Results: a total of 1013 patients underwent non-revisional LRYGB during the study period. Mean %EWL at one year was 55%. When compared between quartiles, there was a statistically significant difference in %EWL: 1st 62%, 2nd 57%, 3rd 54% and 4th 47% (p=0.010). The differences in the secondary outcomes between age groups did not demonstrate statistical significance. Conclusions: though patients in the fourth age quartile (range) did not demonstrate a statistically significant increase in adverse outcomes, they did lose less weight compared to other cohorts. The %EWL at one year after RYGB varied by age in our cohort. Goals after bariatric surgery should be individualized as weight loss is less robust with aging.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912022000100242Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.49 2022reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiõesinstname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)instacron:CBC10.1590/0100-6991e-20223332-eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessQUINTERO,JORGE HUMBERTO RODRIGUEZGROSSER,RACHELVELEZ,GUSTAVO ROMERORAMOS-SANTILLAN,VICENTE OMARPEREIRA,XAVIERFLORES,FERNANDO MUÑOZCHOI,JENNYMORAN-ATKIN,ERINCAMACHO,DIEGOLIMA,DIEGO LAURENTINOeng2022-12-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69912022000100242Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rcbcONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacbc@cbc.org.br1809-45460100-6991opendoar:2022-12-07T00:00Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Safety and efficacy of roux-en-y gastric bypass in older aged patients
title Safety and efficacy of roux-en-y gastric bypass in older aged patients
spellingShingle Safety and efficacy of roux-en-y gastric bypass in older aged patients
QUINTERO,JORGE HUMBERTO RODRIGUEZ
Gastric Bypass
Bariatric Surgery
Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y
title_short Safety and efficacy of roux-en-y gastric bypass in older aged patients
title_full Safety and efficacy of roux-en-y gastric bypass in older aged patients
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of roux-en-y gastric bypass in older aged patients
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of roux-en-y gastric bypass in older aged patients
title_sort Safety and efficacy of roux-en-y gastric bypass in older aged patients
author QUINTERO,JORGE HUMBERTO RODRIGUEZ
author_facet QUINTERO,JORGE HUMBERTO RODRIGUEZ
GROSSER,RACHEL
VELEZ,GUSTAVO ROMERO
RAMOS-SANTILLAN,VICENTE OMAR
PEREIRA,XAVIER
FLORES,FERNANDO MUÑOZ
CHOI,JENNY
MORAN-ATKIN,ERIN
CAMACHO,DIEGO
LIMA,DIEGO LAURENTINO
author_role author
author2 GROSSER,RACHEL
VELEZ,GUSTAVO ROMERO
RAMOS-SANTILLAN,VICENTE OMAR
PEREIRA,XAVIER
FLORES,FERNANDO MUÑOZ
CHOI,JENNY
MORAN-ATKIN,ERIN
CAMACHO,DIEGO
LIMA,DIEGO LAURENTINO
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv QUINTERO,JORGE HUMBERTO RODRIGUEZ
GROSSER,RACHEL
VELEZ,GUSTAVO ROMERO
RAMOS-SANTILLAN,VICENTE OMAR
PEREIRA,XAVIER
FLORES,FERNANDO MUÑOZ
CHOI,JENNY
MORAN-ATKIN,ERIN
CAMACHO,DIEGO
LIMA,DIEGO LAURENTINO
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gastric Bypass
Bariatric Surgery
Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y
topic Gastric Bypass
Bariatric Surgery
Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y
description ABSTRACT Introduction: laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) has been a revolutionary intervention for weight loss with reduction of up to 60-70% of excess body weight. However, these outcomes are not as well validated at the extremes of age, where the safety of the intervention still has some caveats. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of primary LRYGB among different age groups. Methods: the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent primary LRYGB from January 2014 to December 2017 at a single institution. Four groups were created and compared by dividing our sample by age quartiles. The primary outcome was percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 year. Additional operative outcomes and complications were also compared across groups. Results: a total of 1013 patients underwent non-revisional LRYGB during the study period. Mean %EWL at one year was 55%. When compared between quartiles, there was a statistically significant difference in %EWL: 1st 62%, 2nd 57%, 3rd 54% and 4th 47% (p=0.010). The differences in the secondary outcomes between age groups did not demonstrate statistical significance. Conclusions: though patients in the fourth age quartile (range) did not demonstrate a statistically significant increase in adverse outcomes, they did lose less weight compared to other cohorts. The %EWL at one year after RYGB varied by age in our cohort. Goals after bariatric surgery should be individualized as weight loss is less robust with aging.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912022000100242
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912022000100242
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-6991e-20223332-en
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.49 2022
reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
instacron:CBC
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
instacron_str CBC
institution CBC
reponame_str Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
collection Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacbc@cbc.org.br
_version_ 1754209215486885888