Evaluation of pain and opioid consumption in local preemptive anesthesia and the erector spine plane block in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized clinical trial
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912022000100233 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: assess pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing anesthetic techniques of spinal erector plane block and local anesthetic block in video-assisted thoracic surgery in the immediate postoperative period. Methods: ninety-two patients undergoing video assisted thoracic surgery were randomized to receive ESPB or BAL before starting the surgical procedure. Using the numerical verbal scale, the primary outcome assessed was the patient’s pain in the immediate postoperative period (POI). The secondary outcome comprises the assessment of opioid consumption in the IPP by quantifying the medication used in an equianalgesic dose of morphine expressed in milligrams, in the immediate post-anesthetic recovery period, 6h, 12h, and 24h after surgery. Results: the EVN scores in the LBA and ESPB group in the POI had a mean of 0,8 (±1,89) vs 0,58 (±2,02) in the post-anesthesia care room (REPAI), 1,06 (±2,00) vs 1,30 (±2,30) in 6 hours of POI, 0,84 (±1,74) vs 1,19 (±2,01) within 12 hours of POI and 0,95 (±1,88) vs 1 ( ±1,66) within 24 hours of POI, all with p>0.05. Mean opioid consumption in the BAL and ESPB groups in the POI was 12.9 (± 10.4) mg vs 14.9 (±10.2) mg, respectively, with p = 0.416. Sixteen participants in the ESPB group and seventeen in the BAL group did not use opioids during the first 24 hours of the PO analyzed. Conclusion: local anesthesic block and ESP block techniques showed similar results in terms of low pain scores and opioid consumption during the period evaluated. |
id |
CBC-1_cd16cdab2f6e4e4af49970351f0971b9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-69912022000100233 |
network_acronym_str |
CBC-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of pain and opioid consumption in local preemptive anesthesia and the erector spine plane block in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized clinical trialThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedPainPostoperativeAbuse, OpioidAnesthesia, LocalAnesthesiaABSTRACT Objective: assess pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing anesthetic techniques of spinal erector plane block and local anesthetic block in video-assisted thoracic surgery in the immediate postoperative period. Methods: ninety-two patients undergoing video assisted thoracic surgery were randomized to receive ESPB or BAL before starting the surgical procedure. Using the numerical verbal scale, the primary outcome assessed was the patient’s pain in the immediate postoperative period (POI). The secondary outcome comprises the assessment of opioid consumption in the IPP by quantifying the medication used in an equianalgesic dose of morphine expressed in milligrams, in the immediate post-anesthetic recovery period, 6h, 12h, and 24h after surgery. Results: the EVN scores in the LBA and ESPB group in the POI had a mean of 0,8 (±1,89) vs 0,58 (±2,02) in the post-anesthesia care room (REPAI), 1,06 (±2,00) vs 1,30 (±2,30) in 6 hours of POI, 0,84 (±1,74) vs 1,19 (±2,01) within 12 hours of POI and 0,95 (±1,88) vs 1 ( ±1,66) within 24 hours of POI, all with p>0.05. Mean opioid consumption in the BAL and ESPB groups in the POI was 12.9 (± 10.4) mg vs 14.9 (±10.2) mg, respectively, with p = 0.416. Sixteen participants in the ESPB group and seventeen in the BAL group did not use opioids during the first 24 hours of the PO analyzed. Conclusion: local anesthesic block and ESP block techniques showed similar results in terms of low pain scores and opioid consumption during the period evaluated.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912022000100233Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.49 2022reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiõesinstname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)instacron:CBC10.1590/0100-6991e-20223291-eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPALLU,IGHORBOSCOLI,SOFIA DE SOUZAZALESKI,TANIAANDRADE,DIANCARLOS PEREIRA DECHERUBINI,GUILHERME RODRIGO LOBOCZEPULA,ALEXANDRA INGRID DOS SANTOSSOUZA,JULIANO MENDES DEeng2022-08-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69912022000100233Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rcbcONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacbc@cbc.org.br1809-45460100-6991opendoar:2022-08-30T00:00Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of pain and opioid consumption in local preemptive anesthesia and the erector spine plane block in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized clinical trial |
title |
Evaluation of pain and opioid consumption in local preemptive anesthesia and the erector spine plane block in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized clinical trial |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of pain and opioid consumption in local preemptive anesthesia and the erector spine plane block in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized clinical trial PALLU,IGHOR Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted Pain Postoperative Abuse, Opioid Anesthesia, Local Anesthesia |
title_short |
Evaluation of pain and opioid consumption in local preemptive anesthesia and the erector spine plane block in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized clinical trial |
title_full |
Evaluation of pain and opioid consumption in local preemptive anesthesia and the erector spine plane block in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of pain and opioid consumption in local preemptive anesthesia and the erector spine plane block in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of pain and opioid consumption in local preemptive anesthesia and the erector spine plane block in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized clinical trial |
title_sort |
Evaluation of pain and opioid consumption in local preemptive anesthesia and the erector spine plane block in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized clinical trial |
author |
PALLU,IGHOR |
author_facet |
PALLU,IGHOR BOSCOLI,SOFIA DE SOUZA ZALESKI,TANIA ANDRADE,DIANCARLOS PEREIRA DE CHERUBINI,GUILHERME RODRIGO LOBO CZEPULA,ALEXANDRA INGRID DOS SANTOS SOUZA,JULIANO MENDES DE |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
BOSCOLI,SOFIA DE SOUZA ZALESKI,TANIA ANDRADE,DIANCARLOS PEREIRA DE CHERUBINI,GUILHERME RODRIGO LOBO CZEPULA,ALEXANDRA INGRID DOS SANTOS SOUZA,JULIANO MENDES DE |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
PALLU,IGHOR BOSCOLI,SOFIA DE SOUZA ZALESKI,TANIA ANDRADE,DIANCARLOS PEREIRA DE CHERUBINI,GUILHERME RODRIGO LOBO CZEPULA,ALEXANDRA INGRID DOS SANTOS SOUZA,JULIANO MENDES DE |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted Pain Postoperative Abuse, Opioid Anesthesia, Local Anesthesia |
topic |
Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted Pain Postoperative Abuse, Opioid Anesthesia, Local Anesthesia |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: assess pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing anesthetic techniques of spinal erector plane block and local anesthetic block in video-assisted thoracic surgery in the immediate postoperative period. Methods: ninety-two patients undergoing video assisted thoracic surgery were randomized to receive ESPB or BAL before starting the surgical procedure. Using the numerical verbal scale, the primary outcome assessed was the patient’s pain in the immediate postoperative period (POI). The secondary outcome comprises the assessment of opioid consumption in the IPP by quantifying the medication used in an equianalgesic dose of morphine expressed in milligrams, in the immediate post-anesthetic recovery period, 6h, 12h, and 24h after surgery. Results: the EVN scores in the LBA and ESPB group in the POI had a mean of 0,8 (±1,89) vs 0,58 (±2,02) in the post-anesthesia care room (REPAI), 1,06 (±2,00) vs 1,30 (±2,30) in 6 hours of POI, 0,84 (±1,74) vs 1,19 (±2,01) within 12 hours of POI and 0,95 (±1,88) vs 1 ( ±1,66) within 24 hours of POI, all with p>0.05. Mean opioid consumption in the BAL and ESPB groups in the POI was 12.9 (± 10.4) mg vs 14.9 (±10.2) mg, respectively, with p = 0.416. Sixteen participants in the ESPB group and seventeen in the BAL group did not use opioids during the first 24 hours of the PO analyzed. Conclusion: local anesthesic block and ESP block techniques showed similar results in terms of low pain scores and opioid consumption during the period evaluated. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912022000100233 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912022000100233 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-6991e-20223291-en |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.49 2022 reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) instacron:CBC |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) |
instacron_str |
CBC |
institution |
CBC |
reponame_str |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
collection |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacbc@cbc.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209215468011520 |