RE-HEPATECTOMY MEANS MORE MORBIDITY? A MULTICENTRIC ANALYSIS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: BASILIO,Luiza
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: STEINBRÜCK,Klaus, FERNANDES,Reinaldo, D’OLIVEIRA,Marcelo, CANO,Renato, VASCONCELOS,Hanna, BARBOSA,Daniel, ENNE,Marcelo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202022000100303
Resumo: ABSTRACT - BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer generally metastasizes to the liver. Surgical resection of liver metastasis, which is associated with systemic chemotherapy, is potentially curative, but many patients will present recurrence. In selected patients, repeated hepatectomy is feasible and improves overall survival. AIM: This study aimed to analyze patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) submitted to hepatectomy in three centers from Rio de Janeiro, over the past 10 years, by comparing the morbidity of first hepatectomy and re-hepatectomy. METHODS: From June 2009 to July 2020, 192 patients with CRLM underwent liver resection with curative intent in three hospitals from Rio de Janeiro Federal Health System. The data from patients, surgeries, and outcomes were collected from a prospectively maintained database. Patients submitted to first and re-hepatectomies were classified as Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. Data from groups were compared and value of p<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Among 192 patients, 16 were excluded. Of the remaining 176 patients, 148 were included in Group 1 and 28 were included in Group 2. Fifty-five (37.2%) patients in Group 1 and 13 (46.5%) in Group 2 presented postoperative complications. Comparing Groups 1 and 2, we found no statistical difference between the cases of postoperative complications (p=0.834), number of minor (p=0.266) or major (p=0.695) complications, and deaths (p=0.407). CONCLUSIONS: No differences were recorded in morbidity or mortality between patients submitted to first and re-hepatectomies for CRLM, which reinforces that re-hepatectomy can be performed with outcomes comparable to first hepatectomy.
id CBCD-1_7863a23115de7238fefb043b1bffba9d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-67202022000100303
network_acronym_str CBCD-1
network_name_str ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling RE-HEPATECTOMY MEANS MORE MORBIDITY? A MULTICENTRIC ANALYSISLiverHepatectomyMorbidityMortalityABSTRACT - BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer generally metastasizes to the liver. Surgical resection of liver metastasis, which is associated with systemic chemotherapy, is potentially curative, but many patients will present recurrence. In selected patients, repeated hepatectomy is feasible and improves overall survival. AIM: This study aimed to analyze patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) submitted to hepatectomy in three centers from Rio de Janeiro, over the past 10 years, by comparing the morbidity of first hepatectomy and re-hepatectomy. METHODS: From June 2009 to July 2020, 192 patients with CRLM underwent liver resection with curative intent in three hospitals from Rio de Janeiro Federal Health System. The data from patients, surgeries, and outcomes were collected from a prospectively maintained database. Patients submitted to first and re-hepatectomies were classified as Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. Data from groups were compared and value of p<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Among 192 patients, 16 were excluded. Of the remaining 176 patients, 148 were included in Group 1 and 28 were included in Group 2. Fifty-five (37.2%) patients in Group 1 and 13 (46.5%) in Group 2 presented postoperative complications. Comparing Groups 1 and 2, we found no statistical difference between the cases of postoperative complications (p=0.834), number of minor (p=0.266) or major (p=0.695) complications, and deaths (p=0.407). CONCLUSIONS: No differences were recorded in morbidity or mortality between patients submitted to first and re-hepatectomies for CRLM, which reinforces that re-hepatectomy can be performed with outcomes comparable to first hepatectomy.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202022000100303ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.35 2022reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)instacron:CBCD10.1590/0102-672020210002e1647info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBASILIO,LuizaSTEINBRÜCK,KlausFERNANDES,ReinaldoD’OLIVEIRA,MarceloCANO,RenatoVASCONCELOS,HannaBARBOSA,DanielENNE,Marceloeng2022-06-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-67202022000100303Revistahttp://abarriguda.org.br/revista/index.php/revistaabarrigudaarepb/indexONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistaabcd@gmail.com2317-63262317-6326opendoar:2022-06-14T00:00ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv RE-HEPATECTOMY MEANS MORE MORBIDITY? A MULTICENTRIC ANALYSIS
title RE-HEPATECTOMY MEANS MORE MORBIDITY? A MULTICENTRIC ANALYSIS
spellingShingle RE-HEPATECTOMY MEANS MORE MORBIDITY? A MULTICENTRIC ANALYSIS
BASILIO,Luiza
Liver
Hepatectomy
Morbidity
Mortality
title_short RE-HEPATECTOMY MEANS MORE MORBIDITY? A MULTICENTRIC ANALYSIS
title_full RE-HEPATECTOMY MEANS MORE MORBIDITY? A MULTICENTRIC ANALYSIS
title_fullStr RE-HEPATECTOMY MEANS MORE MORBIDITY? A MULTICENTRIC ANALYSIS
title_full_unstemmed RE-HEPATECTOMY MEANS MORE MORBIDITY? A MULTICENTRIC ANALYSIS
title_sort RE-HEPATECTOMY MEANS MORE MORBIDITY? A MULTICENTRIC ANALYSIS
author BASILIO,Luiza
author_facet BASILIO,Luiza
STEINBRÜCK,Klaus
FERNANDES,Reinaldo
D’OLIVEIRA,Marcelo
CANO,Renato
VASCONCELOS,Hanna
BARBOSA,Daniel
ENNE,Marcelo
author_role author
author2 STEINBRÜCK,Klaus
FERNANDES,Reinaldo
D’OLIVEIRA,Marcelo
CANO,Renato
VASCONCELOS,Hanna
BARBOSA,Daniel
ENNE,Marcelo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv BASILIO,Luiza
STEINBRÜCK,Klaus
FERNANDES,Reinaldo
D’OLIVEIRA,Marcelo
CANO,Renato
VASCONCELOS,Hanna
BARBOSA,Daniel
ENNE,Marcelo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Liver
Hepatectomy
Morbidity
Mortality
topic Liver
Hepatectomy
Morbidity
Mortality
description ABSTRACT - BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer generally metastasizes to the liver. Surgical resection of liver metastasis, which is associated with systemic chemotherapy, is potentially curative, but many patients will present recurrence. In selected patients, repeated hepatectomy is feasible and improves overall survival. AIM: This study aimed to analyze patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) submitted to hepatectomy in three centers from Rio de Janeiro, over the past 10 years, by comparing the morbidity of first hepatectomy and re-hepatectomy. METHODS: From June 2009 to July 2020, 192 patients with CRLM underwent liver resection with curative intent in three hospitals from Rio de Janeiro Federal Health System. The data from patients, surgeries, and outcomes were collected from a prospectively maintained database. Patients submitted to first and re-hepatectomies were classified as Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. Data from groups were compared and value of p<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Among 192 patients, 16 were excluded. Of the remaining 176 patients, 148 were included in Group 1 and 28 were included in Group 2. Fifty-five (37.2%) patients in Group 1 and 13 (46.5%) in Group 2 presented postoperative complications. Comparing Groups 1 and 2, we found no statistical difference between the cases of postoperative complications (p=0.834), number of minor (p=0.266) or major (p=0.695) complications, and deaths (p=0.407). CONCLUSIONS: No differences were recorded in morbidity or mortality between patients submitted to first and re-hepatectomies for CRLM, which reinforces that re-hepatectomy can be performed with outcomes comparable to first hepatectomy.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202022000100303
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202022000100303
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0102-672020210002e1647
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.35 2022
reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
instacron:CBCD
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
instacron_str CBCD
institution CBCD
reponame_str ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
collection ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaabcd@gmail.com
_version_ 1754208959433015296