CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202021000200401 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Background: Since publication of our paper “Ten Golden Rules for a Safe MIS Inguinal Hernia Repair” we have received many questions. As the authors, we feel it is important to address these topics as a follow-up to our paper. Aim: To discuss in more details the main points of controversy, review the rules and update de recommendations. Method: The questions and discussions came mainly over five rules, numbered 3, 5, 6, 7, 10. We analyzed all the comments about recommendations and update some technical principles. Results: Rule 3 - Removing normal fat plugs from the obturator canal is unnecessary and therefore is not recommended; Rule 5 - transection of the uterine round ligament (1 cm proximal to the deep ring) facilitates adequate dissection. When performed in this way it does not appear to be associated with complications; Rule 6 - transection of huge sacs are safer than over-dissection of the cord structures. Whether dissecting completely the sac or abandon the distal part it results in less postoperative seromas is an ongoing debate; Rule 7 - any retroperitoneal structure traversing the internal ring is or play a role like a hernia. Failing to identify and remove the lipoma will ultimately result in the patient experiencing a recurrence; Rule 10 - in TAPP peritoneum should preferably be closed with suture than tackes. Conclusion: 10 Golden Rules emphasize the most important surgical tips and technical steps that allow the safe performance of MIS repairs of inguinal hernias, regardless the technique. |
id |
CBCD-1_9a62410a8344d9dd9fec1d2f82b89f89 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-67202021000200401 |
network_acronym_str |
CBCD-1 |
network_name_str |
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE?Inguinal herniaMinimally invasive surgeryLaparoscopyRobotic, critical viewGolden rulesABSTRACT Background: Since publication of our paper “Ten Golden Rules for a Safe MIS Inguinal Hernia Repair” we have received many questions. As the authors, we feel it is important to address these topics as a follow-up to our paper. Aim: To discuss in more details the main points of controversy, review the rules and update de recommendations. Method: The questions and discussions came mainly over five rules, numbered 3, 5, 6, 7, 10. We analyzed all the comments about recommendations and update some technical principles. Results: Rule 3 - Removing normal fat plugs from the obturator canal is unnecessary and therefore is not recommended; Rule 5 - transection of the uterine round ligament (1 cm proximal to the deep ring) facilitates adequate dissection. When performed in this way it does not appear to be associated with complications; Rule 6 - transection of huge sacs are safer than over-dissection of the cord structures. Whether dissecting completely the sac or abandon the distal part it results in less postoperative seromas is an ongoing debate; Rule 7 - any retroperitoneal structure traversing the internal ring is or play a role like a hernia. Failing to identify and remove the lipoma will ultimately result in the patient experiencing a recurrence; Rule 10 - in TAPP peritoneum should preferably be closed with suture than tackes. Conclusion: 10 Golden Rules emphasize the most important surgical tips and technical steps that allow the safe performance of MIS repairs of inguinal hernias, regardless the technique.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202021000200401ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.34 n.2 2021reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)instacron:CBCD10.1590/0102-672020210002e1597info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCLAUS,ChristianoCAVAZOLLA,Leandro TottiFURTADO,MarceloMALCHER,FlavioFELIX,Edwardeng2021-10-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-67202021000200401Revistahttp://abarriguda.org.br/revista/index.php/revistaabarrigudaarepb/indexONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistaabcd@gmail.com2317-63262317-6326opendoar:2021-10-14T00:00ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE? |
title |
CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE? |
spellingShingle |
CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE? CLAUS,Christiano Inguinal hernia Minimally invasive surgery Laparoscopy Robotic, critical view Golden rules |
title_short |
CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE? |
title_full |
CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE? |
title_fullStr |
CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE? |
title_full_unstemmed |
CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE? |
title_sort |
CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE? |
author |
CLAUS,Christiano |
author_facet |
CLAUS,Christiano CAVAZOLLA,Leandro Totti FURTADO,Marcelo MALCHER,Flavio FELIX,Edward |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
CAVAZOLLA,Leandro Totti FURTADO,Marcelo MALCHER,Flavio FELIX,Edward |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
CLAUS,Christiano CAVAZOLLA,Leandro Totti FURTADO,Marcelo MALCHER,Flavio FELIX,Edward |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Inguinal hernia Minimally invasive surgery Laparoscopy Robotic, critical view Golden rules |
topic |
Inguinal hernia Minimally invasive surgery Laparoscopy Robotic, critical view Golden rules |
description |
ABSTRACT Background: Since publication of our paper “Ten Golden Rules for a Safe MIS Inguinal Hernia Repair” we have received many questions. As the authors, we feel it is important to address these topics as a follow-up to our paper. Aim: To discuss in more details the main points of controversy, review the rules and update de recommendations. Method: The questions and discussions came mainly over five rules, numbered 3, 5, 6, 7, 10. We analyzed all the comments about recommendations and update some technical principles. Results: Rule 3 - Removing normal fat plugs from the obturator canal is unnecessary and therefore is not recommended; Rule 5 - transection of the uterine round ligament (1 cm proximal to the deep ring) facilitates adequate dissection. When performed in this way it does not appear to be associated with complications; Rule 6 - transection of huge sacs are safer than over-dissection of the cord structures. Whether dissecting completely the sac or abandon the distal part it results in less postoperative seromas is an ongoing debate; Rule 7 - any retroperitoneal structure traversing the internal ring is or play a role like a hernia. Failing to identify and remove the lipoma will ultimately result in the patient experiencing a recurrence; Rule 10 - in TAPP peritoneum should preferably be closed with suture than tackes. Conclusion: 10 Golden Rules emphasize the most important surgical tips and technical steps that allow the safe performance of MIS repairs of inguinal hernias, regardless the technique. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202021000200401 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202021000200401 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0102-672020210002e1597 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.34 n.2 2021 reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD) instacron:CBCD |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD) |
instacron_str |
CBCD |
institution |
CBCD |
reponame_str |
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) |
collection |
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaabcd@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754208959206522880 |