CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: CLAUS,Christiano
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: CAVAZOLLA,Leandro Totti, FURTADO,Marcelo, MALCHER,Flavio, FELIX,Edward
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202021000200401
Resumo: ABSTRACT Background: Since publication of our paper “Ten Golden Rules for a Safe MIS Inguinal Hernia Repair” we have received many questions. As the authors, we feel it is important to address these topics as a follow-up to our paper. Aim: To discuss in more details the main points of controversy, review the rules and update de recommendations. Method: The questions and discussions came mainly over five rules, numbered 3, 5, 6, 7, 10. We analyzed all the comments about recommendations and update some technical principles. Results: Rule 3 - Removing normal fat plugs from the obturator canal is unnecessary and therefore is not recommended; Rule 5 - transection of the uterine round ligament (1 cm proximal to the deep ring) facilitates adequate dissection. When performed in this way it does not appear to be associated with complications; Rule 6 - transection of huge sacs are safer than over-dissection of the cord structures. Whether dissecting completely the sac or abandon the distal part it results in less postoperative seromas is an ongoing debate; Rule 7 - any retroperitoneal structure traversing the internal ring is or play a role like a hernia. Failing to identify and remove the lipoma will ultimately result in the patient experiencing a recurrence; Rule 10 - in TAPP peritoneum should preferably be closed with suture than tackes. Conclusion: 10 Golden Rules emphasize the most important surgical tips and technical steps that allow the safe performance of MIS repairs of inguinal hernias, regardless the technique.
id CBCD-1_9a62410a8344d9dd9fec1d2f82b89f89
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-67202021000200401
network_acronym_str CBCD-1
network_name_str ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE?Inguinal herniaMinimally invasive surgeryLaparoscopyRobotic, critical viewGolden rulesABSTRACT Background: Since publication of our paper “Ten Golden Rules for a Safe MIS Inguinal Hernia Repair” we have received many questions. As the authors, we feel it is important to address these topics as a follow-up to our paper. Aim: To discuss in more details the main points of controversy, review the rules and update de recommendations. Method: The questions and discussions came mainly over five rules, numbered 3, 5, 6, 7, 10. We analyzed all the comments about recommendations and update some technical principles. Results: Rule 3 - Removing normal fat plugs from the obturator canal is unnecessary and therefore is not recommended; Rule 5 - transection of the uterine round ligament (1 cm proximal to the deep ring) facilitates adequate dissection. When performed in this way it does not appear to be associated with complications; Rule 6 - transection of huge sacs are safer than over-dissection of the cord structures. Whether dissecting completely the sac or abandon the distal part it results in less postoperative seromas is an ongoing debate; Rule 7 - any retroperitoneal structure traversing the internal ring is or play a role like a hernia. Failing to identify and remove the lipoma will ultimately result in the patient experiencing a recurrence; Rule 10 - in TAPP peritoneum should preferably be closed with suture than tackes. Conclusion: 10 Golden Rules emphasize the most important surgical tips and technical steps that allow the safe performance of MIS repairs of inguinal hernias, regardless the technique.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202021000200401ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.34 n.2 2021reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)instacron:CBCD10.1590/0102-672020210002e1597info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCLAUS,ChristianoCAVAZOLLA,Leandro TottiFURTADO,MarceloMALCHER,FlavioFELIX,Edwardeng2021-10-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-67202021000200401Revistahttp://abarriguda.org.br/revista/index.php/revistaabarrigudaarepb/indexONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistaabcd@gmail.com2317-63262317-6326opendoar:2021-10-14T00:00ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE?
title CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE?
spellingShingle CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE?
CLAUS,Christiano
Inguinal hernia
Minimally invasive surgery
Laparoscopy
Robotic, critical view
Golden rules
title_short CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE?
title_full CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE?
title_fullStr CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE?
title_full_unstemmed CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE?
title_sort CHALLENGES TO THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR A SAFE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (MIS) INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: CAN WE IMPROVE?
author CLAUS,Christiano
author_facet CLAUS,Christiano
CAVAZOLLA,Leandro Totti
FURTADO,Marcelo
MALCHER,Flavio
FELIX,Edward
author_role author
author2 CAVAZOLLA,Leandro Totti
FURTADO,Marcelo
MALCHER,Flavio
FELIX,Edward
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv CLAUS,Christiano
CAVAZOLLA,Leandro Totti
FURTADO,Marcelo
MALCHER,Flavio
FELIX,Edward
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Inguinal hernia
Minimally invasive surgery
Laparoscopy
Robotic, critical view
Golden rules
topic Inguinal hernia
Minimally invasive surgery
Laparoscopy
Robotic, critical view
Golden rules
description ABSTRACT Background: Since publication of our paper “Ten Golden Rules for a Safe MIS Inguinal Hernia Repair” we have received many questions. As the authors, we feel it is important to address these topics as a follow-up to our paper. Aim: To discuss in more details the main points of controversy, review the rules and update de recommendations. Method: The questions and discussions came mainly over five rules, numbered 3, 5, 6, 7, 10. We analyzed all the comments about recommendations and update some technical principles. Results: Rule 3 - Removing normal fat plugs from the obturator canal is unnecessary and therefore is not recommended; Rule 5 - transection of the uterine round ligament (1 cm proximal to the deep ring) facilitates adequate dissection. When performed in this way it does not appear to be associated with complications; Rule 6 - transection of huge sacs are safer than over-dissection of the cord structures. Whether dissecting completely the sac or abandon the distal part it results in less postoperative seromas is an ongoing debate; Rule 7 - any retroperitoneal structure traversing the internal ring is or play a role like a hernia. Failing to identify and remove the lipoma will ultimately result in the patient experiencing a recurrence; Rule 10 - in TAPP peritoneum should preferably be closed with suture than tackes. Conclusion: 10 Golden Rules emphasize the most important surgical tips and technical steps that allow the safe performance of MIS repairs of inguinal hernias, regardless the technique.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202021000200401
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202021000200401
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0102-672020210002e1597
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.34 n.2 2021
reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
instacron:CBCD
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
instacron_str CBCD
institution CBCD
reponame_str ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
collection ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaabcd@gmail.com
_version_ 1754208959206522880