INCISIONAL HERNIA AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY: ONLY THE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION IS ENOUGH?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rossi,Felipe Martin Bianco
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Moreno,Ricardo, Druziani,Amarilys Luiza, Perez,Matheus Moreira, Possari,Eduardo, Ferreira Da-Silva,Renato Barretto, Rossi,Marçal
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202022000100326
Resumo: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is characterized by a bulging of the abdominal wall caused by the prolapse of intracavitary structures, such as a segment of the small intestine, through the trocar orifice. Ultrasonography and physical examination are used in the diagnosis of incisional hernia. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the difference between physical examination and abdominal ultrasonography at the diagnosis of incisional hernia in patients who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery. METHODS: A total of 123 patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass type bariatric surgery performed by laparoscopy were analyzed for the presence or absence of hernia by physical and ultrasonography examination at each trocar incision site. RESULTS: In our results, a total of 7 hernias were detected by physical examination, while ultrasonography detected a total of 56 hernias in at least one of the incision sites. Lin's concordance analysis showed that the tests are not concordant. The association between body mass index and hernia detection (p=0.04 for physical examination and p=0.052 for ultrasonography) was observed. Ultrasonography detected more incisional hernias in 10-mm or larger trocars than in 5-mm trocars (p<0.0001, p<0.05). No differences were noted among the trocar types that were used. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal ultrasonography showed to have a higher accuracy than physical examination, resulting in a substantial increase in incisional hernia detection at the trocar sites.
id CBCD-1_bfbcfa2a157ec68e495f1c86ec63b7a1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-67202022000100326
network_acronym_str CBCD-1
network_name_str ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling INCISIONAL HERNIA AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY: ONLY THE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION IS ENOUGH?Incisional HerniaAnastomosisRoux-en-YGastric BypassUltrasonographyABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is characterized by a bulging of the abdominal wall caused by the prolapse of intracavitary structures, such as a segment of the small intestine, through the trocar orifice. Ultrasonography and physical examination are used in the diagnosis of incisional hernia. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the difference between physical examination and abdominal ultrasonography at the diagnosis of incisional hernia in patients who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery. METHODS: A total of 123 patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass type bariatric surgery performed by laparoscopy were analyzed for the presence or absence of hernia by physical and ultrasonography examination at each trocar incision site. RESULTS: In our results, a total of 7 hernias were detected by physical examination, while ultrasonography detected a total of 56 hernias in at least one of the incision sites. Lin's concordance analysis showed that the tests are not concordant. The association between body mass index and hernia detection (p=0.04 for physical examination and p=0.052 for ultrasonography) was observed. Ultrasonography detected more incisional hernias in 10-mm or larger trocars than in 5-mm trocars (p<0.0001, p<0.05). No differences were noted among the trocar types that were used. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal ultrasonography showed to have a higher accuracy than physical examination, resulting in a substantial increase in incisional hernia detection at the trocar sites.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202022000100326ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.35 2022reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)instacron:CBCD10.1590/0102-672020220002e1673info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRossi,Felipe Martin BiancoMoreno,RicardoDruziani,Amarilys LuizaPerez,Matheus MoreiraPossari,EduardoFerreira Da-Silva,Renato BarrettoRossi,Marçaleng2022-09-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-67202022000100326Revistahttp://abarriguda.org.br/revista/index.php/revistaabarrigudaarepb/indexONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistaabcd@gmail.com2317-63262317-6326opendoar:2022-09-06T00:00ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv INCISIONAL HERNIA AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY: ONLY THE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION IS ENOUGH?
title INCISIONAL HERNIA AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY: ONLY THE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION IS ENOUGH?
spellingShingle INCISIONAL HERNIA AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY: ONLY THE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION IS ENOUGH?
Rossi,Felipe Martin Bianco
Incisional Hernia
Anastomosis
Roux-en-Y
Gastric Bypass
Ultrasonography
title_short INCISIONAL HERNIA AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY: ONLY THE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION IS ENOUGH?
title_full INCISIONAL HERNIA AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY: ONLY THE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION IS ENOUGH?
title_fullStr INCISIONAL HERNIA AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY: ONLY THE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION IS ENOUGH?
title_full_unstemmed INCISIONAL HERNIA AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY: ONLY THE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION IS ENOUGH?
title_sort INCISIONAL HERNIA AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY: ONLY THE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION IS ENOUGH?
author Rossi,Felipe Martin Bianco
author_facet Rossi,Felipe Martin Bianco
Moreno,Ricardo
Druziani,Amarilys Luiza
Perez,Matheus Moreira
Possari,Eduardo
Ferreira Da-Silva,Renato Barretto
Rossi,Marçal
author_role author
author2 Moreno,Ricardo
Druziani,Amarilys Luiza
Perez,Matheus Moreira
Possari,Eduardo
Ferreira Da-Silva,Renato Barretto
Rossi,Marçal
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rossi,Felipe Martin Bianco
Moreno,Ricardo
Druziani,Amarilys Luiza
Perez,Matheus Moreira
Possari,Eduardo
Ferreira Da-Silva,Renato Barretto
Rossi,Marçal
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Incisional Hernia
Anastomosis
Roux-en-Y
Gastric Bypass
Ultrasonography
topic Incisional Hernia
Anastomosis
Roux-en-Y
Gastric Bypass
Ultrasonography
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is characterized by a bulging of the abdominal wall caused by the prolapse of intracavitary structures, such as a segment of the small intestine, through the trocar orifice. Ultrasonography and physical examination are used in the diagnosis of incisional hernia. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the difference between physical examination and abdominal ultrasonography at the diagnosis of incisional hernia in patients who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery. METHODS: A total of 123 patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass type bariatric surgery performed by laparoscopy were analyzed for the presence or absence of hernia by physical and ultrasonography examination at each trocar incision site. RESULTS: In our results, a total of 7 hernias were detected by physical examination, while ultrasonography detected a total of 56 hernias in at least one of the incision sites. Lin's concordance analysis showed that the tests are not concordant. The association between body mass index and hernia detection (p=0.04 for physical examination and p=0.052 for ultrasonography) was observed. Ultrasonography detected more incisional hernias in 10-mm or larger trocars than in 5-mm trocars (p<0.0001, p<0.05). No differences were noted among the trocar types that were used. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal ultrasonography showed to have a higher accuracy than physical examination, resulting in a substantial increase in incisional hernia detection at the trocar sites.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202022000100326
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202022000100326
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0102-672020220002e1673
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.35 2022
reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
instacron:CBCD
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
instacron_str CBCD
institution CBCD
reponame_str ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
collection ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaabcd@gmail.com
_version_ 1754208959482298368