Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202015000100065 |
Resumo: | BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopy for the treatment of gastric cancer suffered some resistance among surgeons around the world, gaining strength in the past decade. However, its oncological safety and technical feasibility remain controversial. AIM: To describe the results from the clinical and anatomopathological point of view in the comparative evaluation between the surgical videolaparoscopic and laparotomic treatments of total gastrectomy with linphadenectomy at D2, resection R0. METHOD: Retrospective analyses and comparison data from patients submitted to total gastrectomy with D2 linphadenectomy at a sole institution. The data of 111 patients showed that 64 (57,7%) have been submitted to laparotomic gastrectomy and 47 (42,3%) to gastrectomy entirely performed through videolaparoscopy. All variables related to the surgery, post-operative follow-up and anatomopathologic findings have been evaluated. RESULTS: Among the studied variables, videolaparoscopy has shown a shorter surgical time and a more premature period for the introduction of oral and enteral nourishment than the open surgery. As to the amount of dissected limph nodes, there has been a significant difference towards laparotomy with p=0,014, but the average dissected limph nodes in both groups exceed 25 nodes as recommended by the JAGC. Was not found a significant difference between the studied groups as to age, ASA, type of surgery, need for blood transfusion, stage of the disease, Bormann classification, degree of differentiation, damage of the margins, further complications and death. CONCLUSION: The total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy performed by laparoscopy presented the same benefits known of laparotomy and with the advantages already established of minimally invasive surgery. It was done with less surgical time, less time for re-introduction of the oral and enteral diets and lower hospitalization time compared to laparotomy, without increasing postoperative complications. |
id |
CBCD-1_f781373c23837371f4e7490f0a42d912 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-67202015000100065 |
network_acronym_str |
CBCD-1 |
network_name_str |
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancerTotal gastrectomyLaparoscopic gastrectomyGastriccancerD2 lymphadenectomy BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopy for the treatment of gastric cancer suffered some resistance among surgeons around the world, gaining strength in the past decade. However, its oncological safety and technical feasibility remain controversial. AIM: To describe the results from the clinical and anatomopathological point of view in the comparative evaluation between the surgical videolaparoscopic and laparotomic treatments of total gastrectomy with linphadenectomy at D2, resection R0. METHOD: Retrospective analyses and comparison data from patients submitted to total gastrectomy with D2 linphadenectomy at a sole institution. The data of 111 patients showed that 64 (57,7%) have been submitted to laparotomic gastrectomy and 47 (42,3%) to gastrectomy entirely performed through videolaparoscopy. All variables related to the surgery, post-operative follow-up and anatomopathologic findings have been evaluated. RESULTS: Among the studied variables, videolaparoscopy has shown a shorter surgical time and a more premature period for the introduction of oral and enteral nourishment than the open surgery. As to the amount of dissected limph nodes, there has been a significant difference towards laparotomy with p=0,014, but the average dissected limph nodes in both groups exceed 25 nodes as recommended by the JAGC. Was not found a significant difference between the studied groups as to age, ASA, type of surgery, need for blood transfusion, stage of the disease, Bormann classification, degree of differentiation, damage of the margins, further complications and death. CONCLUSION: The total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy performed by laparoscopy presented the same benefits known of laparotomy and with the advantages already established of minimally invasive surgery. It was done with less surgical time, less time for re-introduction of the oral and enteral diets and lower hospitalization time compared to laparotomy, without increasing postoperative complications.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202015000100065ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.28 n.1 2015reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)instacron:CBCD10.1590/s0102-67202015000100017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRAMAGEM,Carlos Alexandre GarçãoLINHARES,MarceloLACERDA,Croider FrancoBERTULUCCI,Paulo AndersonWONRATH,DurvalOLIVEIRA,Antônio Talvane Torres deeng2017-07-31T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-67202015000100065Revistahttp://abarriguda.org.br/revista/index.php/revistaabarrigudaarepb/indexONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistaabcd@gmail.com2317-63262317-6326opendoar:2017-07-31T00:00ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer |
title |
Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer RAMAGEM,Carlos Alexandre Garção Total gastrectomy Laparoscopic gastrectomy Gastriccancer D2 lymphadenectomy |
title_short |
Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer |
title_full |
Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer |
title_sort |
Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer |
author |
RAMAGEM,Carlos Alexandre Garção |
author_facet |
RAMAGEM,Carlos Alexandre Garção LINHARES,Marcelo LACERDA,Croider Franco BERTULUCCI,Paulo Anderson WONRATH,Durval OLIVEIRA,Antônio Talvane Torres de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
LINHARES,Marcelo LACERDA,Croider Franco BERTULUCCI,Paulo Anderson WONRATH,Durval OLIVEIRA,Antônio Talvane Torres de |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
RAMAGEM,Carlos Alexandre Garção LINHARES,Marcelo LACERDA,Croider Franco BERTULUCCI,Paulo Anderson WONRATH,Durval OLIVEIRA,Antônio Talvane Torres de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Total gastrectomy Laparoscopic gastrectomy Gastriccancer D2 lymphadenectomy |
topic |
Total gastrectomy Laparoscopic gastrectomy Gastriccancer D2 lymphadenectomy |
description |
BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopy for the treatment of gastric cancer suffered some resistance among surgeons around the world, gaining strength in the past decade. However, its oncological safety and technical feasibility remain controversial. AIM: To describe the results from the clinical and anatomopathological point of view in the comparative evaluation between the surgical videolaparoscopic and laparotomic treatments of total gastrectomy with linphadenectomy at D2, resection R0. METHOD: Retrospective analyses and comparison data from patients submitted to total gastrectomy with D2 linphadenectomy at a sole institution. The data of 111 patients showed that 64 (57,7%) have been submitted to laparotomic gastrectomy and 47 (42,3%) to gastrectomy entirely performed through videolaparoscopy. All variables related to the surgery, post-operative follow-up and anatomopathologic findings have been evaluated. RESULTS: Among the studied variables, videolaparoscopy has shown a shorter surgical time and a more premature period for the introduction of oral and enteral nourishment than the open surgery. As to the amount of dissected limph nodes, there has been a significant difference towards laparotomy with p=0,014, but the average dissected limph nodes in both groups exceed 25 nodes as recommended by the JAGC. Was not found a significant difference between the studied groups as to age, ASA, type of surgery, need for blood transfusion, stage of the disease, Bormann classification, degree of differentiation, damage of the margins, further complications and death. CONCLUSION: The total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy performed by laparoscopy presented the same benefits known of laparotomy and with the advantages already established of minimally invasive surgery. It was done with less surgical time, less time for re-introduction of the oral and enteral diets and lower hospitalization time compared to laparotomy, without increasing postoperative complications. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202015000100065 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202015000100065 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s0102-67202015000100017 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.28 n.1 2015 reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD) instacron:CBCD |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD) |
instacron_str |
CBCD |
institution |
CBCD |
reponame_str |
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) |
collection |
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaabcd@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754208957276094464 |