Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: RAMAGEM,Carlos Alexandre Garção
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: LINHARES,Marcelo, LACERDA,Croider Franco, BERTULUCCI,Paulo Anderson, WONRATH,Durval, OLIVEIRA,Antônio Talvane Torres de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202015000100065
Resumo: BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopy for the treatment of gastric cancer suffered some resistance among surgeons around the world, gaining strength in the past decade. However, its oncological safety and technical feasibility remain controversial. AIM: To describe the results from the clinical and anatomopathological point of view in the comparative evaluation between the surgical videolaparoscopic and laparotomic treatments of total gastrectomy with linphadenectomy at D2, resection R0. METHOD: Retrospective analyses and comparison data from patients submitted to total gastrectomy with D2 linphadenectomy at a sole institution. The data of 111 patients showed that 64 (57,7%) have been submitted to laparotomic gastrectomy and 47 (42,3%) to gastrectomy entirely performed through videolaparoscopy. All variables related to the surgery, post-operative follow-up and anatomopathologic findings have been evaluated. RESULTS: Among the studied variables, videolaparoscopy has shown a shorter surgical time and a more premature period for the introduction of oral and enteral nourishment than the open surgery. As to the amount of dissected limph nodes, there has been a significant difference towards laparotomy with p=0,014, but the average dissected limph nodes in both groups exceed 25 nodes as recommended by the JAGC. Was not found a significant difference between the studied groups as to age, ASA, type of surgery, need for blood transfusion, stage of the disease, Bormann classification, degree of differentiation, damage of the margins, further complications and death. CONCLUSION: The total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy performed by laparoscopy presented the same benefits known of laparotomy and with the advantages already established of minimally invasive surgery. It was done with less surgical time, less time for re-introduction of the oral and enteral diets and lower hospitalization time compared to laparotomy, without increasing postoperative complications.
id CBCD-1_f781373c23837371f4e7490f0a42d912
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-67202015000100065
network_acronym_str CBCD-1
network_name_str ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancerTotal gastrectomyLaparoscopic gastrectomyGastriccancerD2 lymphadenectomy BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopy for the treatment of gastric cancer suffered some resistance among surgeons around the world, gaining strength in the past decade. However, its oncological safety and technical feasibility remain controversial. AIM: To describe the results from the clinical and anatomopathological point of view in the comparative evaluation between the surgical videolaparoscopic and laparotomic treatments of total gastrectomy with linphadenectomy at D2, resection R0. METHOD: Retrospective analyses and comparison data from patients submitted to total gastrectomy with D2 linphadenectomy at a sole institution. The data of 111 patients showed that 64 (57,7%) have been submitted to laparotomic gastrectomy and 47 (42,3%) to gastrectomy entirely performed through videolaparoscopy. All variables related to the surgery, post-operative follow-up and anatomopathologic findings have been evaluated. RESULTS: Among the studied variables, videolaparoscopy has shown a shorter surgical time and a more premature period for the introduction of oral and enteral nourishment than the open surgery. As to the amount of dissected limph nodes, there has been a significant difference towards laparotomy with p=0,014, but the average dissected limph nodes in both groups exceed 25 nodes as recommended by the JAGC. Was not found a significant difference between the studied groups as to age, ASA, type of surgery, need for blood transfusion, stage of the disease, Bormann classification, degree of differentiation, damage of the margins, further complications and death. CONCLUSION: The total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy performed by laparoscopy presented the same benefits known of laparotomy and with the advantages already established of minimally invasive surgery. It was done with less surgical time, less time for re-introduction of the oral and enteral diets and lower hospitalization time compared to laparotomy, without increasing postoperative complications.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202015000100065ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.28 n.1 2015reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)instacron:CBCD10.1590/s0102-67202015000100017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRAMAGEM,Carlos Alexandre GarçãoLINHARES,MarceloLACERDA,Croider FrancoBERTULUCCI,Paulo AndersonWONRATH,DurvalOLIVEIRA,Antônio Talvane Torres deeng2017-07-31T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-67202015000100065Revistahttp://abarriguda.org.br/revista/index.php/revistaabarrigudaarepb/indexONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistaabcd@gmail.com2317-63262317-6326opendoar:2017-07-31T00:00ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer
title Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer
spellingShingle Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer
RAMAGEM,Carlos Alexandre Garção
Total gastrectomy
Laparoscopic gastrectomy
Gastriccancer
D2 lymphadenectomy
title_short Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer
title_full Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer
title_sort Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer
author RAMAGEM,Carlos Alexandre Garção
author_facet RAMAGEM,Carlos Alexandre Garção
LINHARES,Marcelo
LACERDA,Croider Franco
BERTULUCCI,Paulo Anderson
WONRATH,Durval
OLIVEIRA,Antônio Talvane Torres de
author_role author
author2 LINHARES,Marcelo
LACERDA,Croider Franco
BERTULUCCI,Paulo Anderson
WONRATH,Durval
OLIVEIRA,Antônio Talvane Torres de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv RAMAGEM,Carlos Alexandre Garção
LINHARES,Marcelo
LACERDA,Croider Franco
BERTULUCCI,Paulo Anderson
WONRATH,Durval
OLIVEIRA,Antônio Talvane Torres de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Total gastrectomy
Laparoscopic gastrectomy
Gastriccancer
D2 lymphadenectomy
topic Total gastrectomy
Laparoscopic gastrectomy
Gastriccancer
D2 lymphadenectomy
description BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopy for the treatment of gastric cancer suffered some resistance among surgeons around the world, gaining strength in the past decade. However, its oncological safety and technical feasibility remain controversial. AIM: To describe the results from the clinical and anatomopathological point of view in the comparative evaluation between the surgical videolaparoscopic and laparotomic treatments of total gastrectomy with linphadenectomy at D2, resection R0. METHOD: Retrospective analyses and comparison data from patients submitted to total gastrectomy with D2 linphadenectomy at a sole institution. The data of 111 patients showed that 64 (57,7%) have been submitted to laparotomic gastrectomy and 47 (42,3%) to gastrectomy entirely performed through videolaparoscopy. All variables related to the surgery, post-operative follow-up and anatomopathologic findings have been evaluated. RESULTS: Among the studied variables, videolaparoscopy has shown a shorter surgical time and a more premature period for the introduction of oral and enteral nourishment than the open surgery. As to the amount of dissected limph nodes, there has been a significant difference towards laparotomy with p=0,014, but the average dissected limph nodes in both groups exceed 25 nodes as recommended by the JAGC. Was not found a significant difference between the studied groups as to age, ASA, type of surgery, need for blood transfusion, stage of the disease, Bormann classification, degree of differentiation, damage of the margins, further complications and death. CONCLUSION: The total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy performed by laparoscopy presented the same benefits known of laparotomy and with the advantages already established of minimally invasive surgery. It was done with less surgical time, less time for re-introduction of the oral and enteral diets and lower hospitalization time compared to laparotomy, without increasing postoperative complications.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202015000100065
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202015000100065
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s0102-67202015000100017
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.28 n.1 2015
reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
instacron:CBCD
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
instacron_str CBCD
institution CBCD
reponame_str ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
collection ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaabcd@gmail.com
_version_ 1754208957276094464