Costs and outcomes of phacoemulsification for cataracts performed by residents

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Saad Filho,Roberto
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Moreto,Renata, Nakaghi,Ricardo Okada, Haddad,William, Coelho,Roberto Pinto, Messias,André
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492020000300008
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: To describe costs and outcomes of phacoemulsification for cataracts performed by ophthalmology residents. Methods: We obtained medical records from patients operated on in 2011 by third year residents (R3) using phacoemulsification (n=576). Our expenses estimation included professionals’ and hospital costs (fees, materials, medications, and equipment). The study outcomes included spectacle-corrected visual acuities before and six months after the operation, rate of intraoperative complications, and total number of postoperative visits. We compared outcome variables with those from extracapsular cataract extraction procedures (n=274) performed by R3 residents in 1997. Results: The mean total cost for phacoemulsification was US$ 416, while an overall estimation indicated the extracapsular cataract extraction cost at US$ 284 (as of December 30, 2011). The mean preoperative spectacle-corrected visual acuity was worse for eyes scheduled for extracapsular cataract extraction (1.73 ± 0.62), than for eyes scheduled for phacoemulsification (0.74 ± 0.54 logMAR) (p<0.01); the mean postoperative visual acuity was better for phacoemulsification (0.21 ± 0.36 logMAR), than for extracapsular cataract extraction (0.63 ± 0.63 logMAR) (p<0.01). Most patients undergoing phacoemulsification (85%) achieved postoperative spectacle-corrected visual acuities ≥0.30 logMAR, while only 45% of those undergoing extracapsular cataract extractions achieved the same postoperative visual acuity (p<0.01). The rate of intraoperative complications was significantly higher after extracapsular cataract extractions (21%) than it was after phacoemulsifications (7.6%) (p<0.01), and the mean number of postoperative visits was also higher after extracapsular cataract extractions (5.6 ± 2.3) than after phacoemulsifications (4.5 ± 2.4) (p<0.01). Conclusion: These data indicate that cataract surgery performed by in-training ophthalmologists using phacoemulsification is expensive, but compared to extracapsular cataract extraction results, teaching phacoemulsification leads to an approximate three-fold lower complication rate, smaller number of postoperative visits and, most importantly, better visual acuities.
id CBO-2_0aa021bbbf2afa18ded244a9341a0c6e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0004-27492020000300008
network_acronym_str CBO-2
network_name_str Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Costs and outcomes of phacoemulsification for cataracts performed by residentsCataract extraction/economicsHealth care and cost analysisLens, crystalline/surgeryPhacoemulsificationTreatment outcomeABSTRACT Purpose: To describe costs and outcomes of phacoemulsification for cataracts performed by ophthalmology residents. Methods: We obtained medical records from patients operated on in 2011 by third year residents (R3) using phacoemulsification (n=576). Our expenses estimation included professionals’ and hospital costs (fees, materials, medications, and equipment). The study outcomes included spectacle-corrected visual acuities before and six months after the operation, rate of intraoperative complications, and total number of postoperative visits. We compared outcome variables with those from extracapsular cataract extraction procedures (n=274) performed by R3 residents in 1997. Results: The mean total cost for phacoemulsification was US$ 416, while an overall estimation indicated the extracapsular cataract extraction cost at US$ 284 (as of December 30, 2011). The mean preoperative spectacle-corrected visual acuity was worse for eyes scheduled for extracapsular cataract extraction (1.73 ± 0.62), than for eyes scheduled for phacoemulsification (0.74 ± 0.54 logMAR) (p<0.01); the mean postoperative visual acuity was better for phacoemulsification (0.21 ± 0.36 logMAR), than for extracapsular cataract extraction (0.63 ± 0.63 logMAR) (p<0.01). Most patients undergoing phacoemulsification (85%) achieved postoperative spectacle-corrected visual acuities ≥0.30 logMAR, while only 45% of those undergoing extracapsular cataract extractions achieved the same postoperative visual acuity (p<0.01). The rate of intraoperative complications was significantly higher after extracapsular cataract extractions (21%) than it was after phacoemulsifications (7.6%) (p<0.01), and the mean number of postoperative visits was also higher after extracapsular cataract extractions (5.6 ± 2.3) than after phacoemulsifications (4.5 ± 2.4) (p<0.01). Conclusion: These data indicate that cataract surgery performed by in-training ophthalmologists using phacoemulsification is expensive, but compared to extracapsular cataract extraction results, teaching phacoemulsification leads to an approximate three-fold lower complication rate, smaller number of postoperative visits and, most importantly, better visual acuities.Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia2020-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492020000300008Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.83 n.3 2020reponame:Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)instname:Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)instacron:CBO10.5935/0004-2749.20200059info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSaad Filho,RobertoMoreto,RenataNakaghi,Ricardo OkadaHaddad,WilliamCoelho,Roberto PintoMessias,Andréeng2020-05-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-27492020000300008Revistahttp://aboonline.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpaboonline@cbo.com.br||abo@cbo.com.br1678-29250004-2749opendoar:2020-05-26T00:00Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) - Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Costs and outcomes of phacoemulsification for cataracts performed by residents
title Costs and outcomes of phacoemulsification for cataracts performed by residents
spellingShingle Costs and outcomes of phacoemulsification for cataracts performed by residents
Saad Filho,Roberto
Cataract extraction/economics
Health care and cost analysis
Lens, crystalline/surgery
Phacoemulsification
Treatment outcome
title_short Costs and outcomes of phacoemulsification for cataracts performed by residents
title_full Costs and outcomes of phacoemulsification for cataracts performed by residents
title_fullStr Costs and outcomes of phacoemulsification for cataracts performed by residents
title_full_unstemmed Costs and outcomes of phacoemulsification for cataracts performed by residents
title_sort Costs and outcomes of phacoemulsification for cataracts performed by residents
author Saad Filho,Roberto
author_facet Saad Filho,Roberto
Moreto,Renata
Nakaghi,Ricardo Okada
Haddad,William
Coelho,Roberto Pinto
Messias,André
author_role author
author2 Moreto,Renata
Nakaghi,Ricardo Okada
Haddad,William
Coelho,Roberto Pinto
Messias,André
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Saad Filho,Roberto
Moreto,Renata
Nakaghi,Ricardo Okada
Haddad,William
Coelho,Roberto Pinto
Messias,André
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cataract extraction/economics
Health care and cost analysis
Lens, crystalline/surgery
Phacoemulsification
Treatment outcome
topic Cataract extraction/economics
Health care and cost analysis
Lens, crystalline/surgery
Phacoemulsification
Treatment outcome
description ABSTRACT Purpose: To describe costs and outcomes of phacoemulsification for cataracts performed by ophthalmology residents. Methods: We obtained medical records from patients operated on in 2011 by third year residents (R3) using phacoemulsification (n=576). Our expenses estimation included professionals’ and hospital costs (fees, materials, medications, and equipment). The study outcomes included spectacle-corrected visual acuities before and six months after the operation, rate of intraoperative complications, and total number of postoperative visits. We compared outcome variables with those from extracapsular cataract extraction procedures (n=274) performed by R3 residents in 1997. Results: The mean total cost for phacoemulsification was US$ 416, while an overall estimation indicated the extracapsular cataract extraction cost at US$ 284 (as of December 30, 2011). The mean preoperative spectacle-corrected visual acuity was worse for eyes scheduled for extracapsular cataract extraction (1.73 ± 0.62), than for eyes scheduled for phacoemulsification (0.74 ± 0.54 logMAR) (p<0.01); the mean postoperative visual acuity was better for phacoemulsification (0.21 ± 0.36 logMAR), than for extracapsular cataract extraction (0.63 ± 0.63 logMAR) (p<0.01). Most patients undergoing phacoemulsification (85%) achieved postoperative spectacle-corrected visual acuities ≥0.30 logMAR, while only 45% of those undergoing extracapsular cataract extractions achieved the same postoperative visual acuity (p<0.01). The rate of intraoperative complications was significantly higher after extracapsular cataract extractions (21%) than it was after phacoemulsifications (7.6%) (p<0.01), and the mean number of postoperative visits was also higher after extracapsular cataract extractions (5.6 ± 2.3) than after phacoemulsifications (4.5 ± 2.4) (p<0.01). Conclusion: These data indicate that cataract surgery performed by in-training ophthalmologists using phacoemulsification is expensive, but compared to extracapsular cataract extraction results, teaching phacoemulsification leads to an approximate three-fold lower complication rate, smaller number of postoperative visits and, most importantly, better visual acuities.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492020000300008
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492020000300008
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/0004-2749.20200059
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.83 n.3 2020
reponame:Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
instname:Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
instacron:CBO
instname_str Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
instacron_str CBO
institution CBO
reponame_str Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
collection Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) - Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv aboonline@cbo.com.br||abo@cbo.com.br
_version_ 1754209030764494848