Incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (2002-2008) at a Brazilian university-hospital
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492010000600007 |
Resumo: | Purpose: To report on the incidence, diagnostic technique, and microbiological features of endophthalmitis at a university-setting in Brazil. Methods: All cases of presumed postoperative endophthalmitis from 2002 to 2008 at a teaching-hospital were included. Main data assessed were: number of cataract surgeries performed, incidence of endophthalmitis, microbiological outcome (aqueous and/or vitreous culture and Gram staining), and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the positive cases. Results: Seventy-three eyes of 73 patients (43 females and 30 males) developed endophthalmitis after 24,590 cataract surgeries. The incidence decreased from 0.49% in 2003 to 0.17% in 2006 and stabilized afterwards. Coagulase negative Staphylococci (CoNS) and Streptococcus viridans (56.5% and 15%, respectively) were the most common bacterial isolates. Culture and Gram stain were negative in 36.9%. CoNS presented susceptibility rates of 80%-sensitivity to oxacillin, 90% to fourth-generation quinolones and 100% to vancomycin. Conclusions: The rate of endophthalmitis, diagnostic ability of conventional laboratory investigation, microbial isolates and antibiotic susceptibility are in accordance with other findings of the literature. Despite using prophylactic antibiotic drops, it was possible to identify cases that were susceptible to the antibiotics topically applied. |
id |
CBO-2_2f7aa394f608734e164727684e524639 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0004-27492010000600007 |
network_acronym_str |
CBO-2 |
network_name_str |
Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (2002-2008) at a Brazilian university-hospitalEndophthalmitis/epidemiologyEndophthalmitis/etiologyEndophthalmitis/diagnosisEndophthalmitis/microbiologyCataract extraction/adverse effectsPurpose: To report on the incidence, diagnostic technique, and microbiological features of endophthalmitis at a university-setting in Brazil. Methods: All cases of presumed postoperative endophthalmitis from 2002 to 2008 at a teaching-hospital were included. Main data assessed were: number of cataract surgeries performed, incidence of endophthalmitis, microbiological outcome (aqueous and/or vitreous culture and Gram staining), and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the positive cases. Results: Seventy-three eyes of 73 patients (43 females and 30 males) developed endophthalmitis after 24,590 cataract surgeries. The incidence decreased from 0.49% in 2003 to 0.17% in 2006 and stabilized afterwards. Coagulase negative Staphylococci (CoNS) and Streptococcus viridans (56.5% and 15%, respectively) were the most common bacterial isolates. Culture and Gram stain were negative in 36.9%. CoNS presented susceptibility rates of 80%-sensitivity to oxacillin, 90% to fourth-generation quinolones and 100% to vancomycin. Conclusions: The rate of endophthalmitis, diagnostic ability of conventional laboratory investigation, microbial isolates and antibiotic susceptibility are in accordance with other findings of the literature. Despite using prophylactic antibiotic drops, it was possible to identify cases that were susceptible to the antibiotics topically applied.Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia2010-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492010000600007Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.73 n.6 2010reponame:Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)instname:Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)instacron:CBO10.1590/S0004-27492010000600007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo,Gustavo BarretoBispo,Paulo José MartinsRegatieri,Caio Vinícius SaitoYu,Maria Cecília ZoratPignatari,Antônio Carlos CamposHöfling-Lima,Ana Luisaeng2011-01-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-27492010000600007Revistahttp://aboonline.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpaboonline@cbo.com.br||abo@cbo.com.br1678-29250004-2749opendoar:2011-01-17T00:00Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) - Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (2002-2008) at a Brazilian university-hospital |
title |
Incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (2002-2008) at a Brazilian university-hospital |
spellingShingle |
Incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (2002-2008) at a Brazilian university-hospital Melo,Gustavo Barreto Endophthalmitis/epidemiology Endophthalmitis/etiology Endophthalmitis/diagnosis Endophthalmitis/microbiology Cataract extraction/adverse effects |
title_short |
Incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (2002-2008) at a Brazilian university-hospital |
title_full |
Incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (2002-2008) at a Brazilian university-hospital |
title_fullStr |
Incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (2002-2008) at a Brazilian university-hospital |
title_full_unstemmed |
Incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (2002-2008) at a Brazilian university-hospital |
title_sort |
Incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (2002-2008) at a Brazilian university-hospital |
author |
Melo,Gustavo Barreto |
author_facet |
Melo,Gustavo Barreto Bispo,Paulo José Martins Regatieri,Caio Vinícius Saito Yu,Maria Cecília Zorat Pignatari,Antônio Carlos Campos Höfling-Lima,Ana Luisa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bispo,Paulo José Martins Regatieri,Caio Vinícius Saito Yu,Maria Cecília Zorat Pignatari,Antônio Carlos Campos Höfling-Lima,Ana Luisa |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Melo,Gustavo Barreto Bispo,Paulo José Martins Regatieri,Caio Vinícius Saito Yu,Maria Cecília Zorat Pignatari,Antônio Carlos Campos Höfling-Lima,Ana Luisa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Endophthalmitis/epidemiology Endophthalmitis/etiology Endophthalmitis/diagnosis Endophthalmitis/microbiology Cataract extraction/adverse effects |
topic |
Endophthalmitis/epidemiology Endophthalmitis/etiology Endophthalmitis/diagnosis Endophthalmitis/microbiology Cataract extraction/adverse effects |
description |
Purpose: To report on the incidence, diagnostic technique, and microbiological features of endophthalmitis at a university-setting in Brazil. Methods: All cases of presumed postoperative endophthalmitis from 2002 to 2008 at a teaching-hospital were included. Main data assessed were: number of cataract surgeries performed, incidence of endophthalmitis, microbiological outcome (aqueous and/or vitreous culture and Gram staining), and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the positive cases. Results: Seventy-three eyes of 73 patients (43 females and 30 males) developed endophthalmitis after 24,590 cataract surgeries. The incidence decreased from 0.49% in 2003 to 0.17% in 2006 and stabilized afterwards. Coagulase negative Staphylococci (CoNS) and Streptococcus viridans (56.5% and 15%, respectively) were the most common bacterial isolates. Culture and Gram stain were negative in 36.9%. CoNS presented susceptibility rates of 80%-sensitivity to oxacillin, 90% to fourth-generation quinolones and 100% to vancomycin. Conclusions: The rate of endophthalmitis, diagnostic ability of conventional laboratory investigation, microbial isolates and antibiotic susceptibility are in accordance with other findings of the literature. Despite using prophylactic antibiotic drops, it was possible to identify cases that were susceptible to the antibiotics topically applied. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492010000600007 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492010000600007 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0004-27492010000600007 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.73 n.6 2010 reponame:Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) instname:Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO) instacron:CBO |
instname_str |
Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO) |
instacron_str |
CBO |
institution |
CBO |
reponame_str |
Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) |
collection |
Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) - Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
aboonline@cbo.com.br||abo@cbo.com.br |
_version_ |
1754209026755788800 |