Clinical evaluation of reprocessed blades in LASIK

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mallmann,Felipe
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Murata,Celina, Yamazaki,Ester Sakae, Campos,Mauro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492008000200016
Resumo: PURPOSE: To evaluate outcome and complications in LASIK with reprocessed blades. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients' charts submitted to complete custom LASIK from January 2004 to June 2005. Inclusion criteria comprised surgical description of blade use and minimum follow-up of 1 month. The blade was reprocessed following a clinic protocol, from 1 to 3 times (reprocessed group) and results compared with patients that underwent LASIK with first-use blades (first-use group). RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-one eyes of 135 patients were analyzed (spherical equivalent of -3.69 (D). There was no statistical differences between first-use group and reprocessed blade group regarding intraoperative (5.5% vs 8.8%), early (50.5% vs 49.5%) and late complications (33% vs 27.5%), respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity > 20/20 (68.1% vs 66.9%), aberrometry analysis (total RMS: 0.62 vs 0.64 µm) and safety (85.7% vs 83.1%) were similar between groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Reprocessed blades following rigid sterilization protocol may have similar outcomes and complications rates in LASIK surgery compared to first-use blades.
id CBO-2_6371936b647ad1eb0dc23a96257baa27
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0004-27492008000200016
network_acronym_str CBO-2
network_name_str Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Clinical evaluation of reprocessed blades in LASIKKeratomileusis, laser in situ/adverse effectsPostoperative complicationsRefractive surgical proceduresRefractive errorsEquipment reusePURPOSE: To evaluate outcome and complications in LASIK with reprocessed blades. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients' charts submitted to complete custom LASIK from January 2004 to June 2005. Inclusion criteria comprised surgical description of blade use and minimum follow-up of 1 month. The blade was reprocessed following a clinic protocol, from 1 to 3 times (reprocessed group) and results compared with patients that underwent LASIK with first-use blades (first-use group). RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-one eyes of 135 patients were analyzed (spherical equivalent of -3.69 (D). There was no statistical differences between first-use group and reprocessed blade group regarding intraoperative (5.5% vs 8.8%), early (50.5% vs 49.5%) and late complications (33% vs 27.5%), respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity > 20/20 (68.1% vs 66.9%), aberrometry analysis (total RMS: 0.62 vs 0.64 µm) and safety (85.7% vs 83.1%) were similar between groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Reprocessed blades following rigid sterilization protocol may have similar outcomes and complications rates in LASIK surgery compared to first-use blades.Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia2008-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492008000200016Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.71 n.2 2008reponame:Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)instname:Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)instacron:CBO10.1590/S0004-27492008000200016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMallmann,FelipeMurata,CelinaYamazaki,Ester SakaeCampos,Mauroeng2008-05-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-27492008000200016Revistahttp://aboonline.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpaboonline@cbo.com.br||abo@cbo.com.br1678-29250004-2749opendoar:2008-05-26T00:00Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) - Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clinical evaluation of reprocessed blades in LASIK
title Clinical evaluation of reprocessed blades in LASIK
spellingShingle Clinical evaluation of reprocessed blades in LASIK
Mallmann,Felipe
Keratomileusis, laser in situ/adverse effects
Postoperative complications
Refractive surgical procedures
Refractive errors
Equipment reuse
title_short Clinical evaluation of reprocessed blades in LASIK
title_full Clinical evaluation of reprocessed blades in LASIK
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of reprocessed blades in LASIK
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of reprocessed blades in LASIK
title_sort Clinical evaluation of reprocessed blades in LASIK
author Mallmann,Felipe
author_facet Mallmann,Felipe
Murata,Celina
Yamazaki,Ester Sakae
Campos,Mauro
author_role author
author2 Murata,Celina
Yamazaki,Ester Sakae
Campos,Mauro
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mallmann,Felipe
Murata,Celina
Yamazaki,Ester Sakae
Campos,Mauro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Keratomileusis, laser in situ/adverse effects
Postoperative complications
Refractive surgical procedures
Refractive errors
Equipment reuse
topic Keratomileusis, laser in situ/adverse effects
Postoperative complications
Refractive surgical procedures
Refractive errors
Equipment reuse
description PURPOSE: To evaluate outcome and complications in LASIK with reprocessed blades. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients' charts submitted to complete custom LASIK from January 2004 to June 2005. Inclusion criteria comprised surgical description of blade use and minimum follow-up of 1 month. The blade was reprocessed following a clinic protocol, from 1 to 3 times (reprocessed group) and results compared with patients that underwent LASIK with first-use blades (first-use group). RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-one eyes of 135 patients were analyzed (spherical equivalent of -3.69 (D). There was no statistical differences between first-use group and reprocessed blade group regarding intraoperative (5.5% vs 8.8%), early (50.5% vs 49.5%) and late complications (33% vs 27.5%), respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity > 20/20 (68.1% vs 66.9%), aberrometry analysis (total RMS: 0.62 vs 0.64 µm) and safety (85.7% vs 83.1%) were similar between groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Reprocessed blades following rigid sterilization protocol may have similar outcomes and complications rates in LASIK surgery compared to first-use blades.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492008000200016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492008000200016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0004-27492008000200016
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.71 n.2 2008
reponame:Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
instname:Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
instacron:CBO
instname_str Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
instacron_str CBO
institution CBO
reponame_str Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
collection Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) - Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv aboonline@cbo.com.br||abo@cbo.com.br
_version_ 1754209025027735552