Corneal differences between healthy and subclinical patients assessed using two diferente corneal tomographers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zhao,Haixia
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Yang,Zhaoping, Han,Xiaotong, Guan,Wenying, Wang,Zhaoge, Cai,Meilan, Sun,Yi, Ge,Ruichun, Wang,Ruifang
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492020000200092
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: To analyze subclinical keratoconus topography indexes using Pentacam and Orbscan-II measurements to identify evidences for seeking sensitive indexes to screen and diagnose subclinical keratoconus. Methods: Fifty healthy participants (50 eyes) and 40 patients with subclinical keratoconus (40 eyes) were included. Seven common parameters including corneal thickness at the thinnest point; minimum curvature of the front surface (minimum simulated keratometry value, SimK’s Min); maximum curvature of the front surface (maximum simulated keratometry value, SimK’s Max); the frontal corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of the curvature; the back corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of curvature; the anterior corneal surface height (anterior Diff value); and the posterior corneal surface height (posterior Diff value) measured by Pentacam and Orbscan-II between normal and subclinical keratoconus eyes were compared. Results: Statistical differences between the healthy and subclinical keratoconus groups (p<0.01) were found in all corneal parameters measured using both devices. Differences in the minimum curvature of the front surface (SimK’s Min), thinnest point, anterior Diff value, and posterior Diff value were significant between Pentacam and Orbscan-II in the subclinical keratoconus group (p<0.05). Conclusion: The findings of this study identify the differences between normal and subclinical keratoconus eyes at the minimum curvature of the front surface, maximum curvature of the front surface, frontal corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of curvature, back corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of curvature, Anterior Diff value, and Posterior Diff value measures using Orbscan II and Pentacam that can help eye care practitioners clinically diagnose subclinical keratoconus.
id CBO-2_768be690c27116f4f37dec35726ebb8c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0004-27492020000200092
network_acronym_str CBO-2
network_name_str Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Corneal differences between healthy and subclinical patients assessed using two diferente corneal tomographersKeratoconus/diagnosisCorneal topographyCornea/diagnostic imagingDiagnostic imaging/methodsComparative studyABSTRACT Purpose: To analyze subclinical keratoconus topography indexes using Pentacam and Orbscan-II measurements to identify evidences for seeking sensitive indexes to screen and diagnose subclinical keratoconus. Methods: Fifty healthy participants (50 eyes) and 40 patients with subclinical keratoconus (40 eyes) were included. Seven common parameters including corneal thickness at the thinnest point; minimum curvature of the front surface (minimum simulated keratometry value, SimK’s Min); maximum curvature of the front surface (maximum simulated keratometry value, SimK’s Max); the frontal corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of the curvature; the back corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of curvature; the anterior corneal surface height (anterior Diff value); and the posterior corneal surface height (posterior Diff value) measured by Pentacam and Orbscan-II between normal and subclinical keratoconus eyes were compared. Results: Statistical differences between the healthy and subclinical keratoconus groups (p<0.01) were found in all corneal parameters measured using both devices. Differences in the minimum curvature of the front surface (SimK’s Min), thinnest point, anterior Diff value, and posterior Diff value were significant between Pentacam and Orbscan-II in the subclinical keratoconus group (p<0.05). Conclusion: The findings of this study identify the differences between normal and subclinical keratoconus eyes at the minimum curvature of the front surface, maximum curvature of the front surface, frontal corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of curvature, back corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of curvature, Anterior Diff value, and Posterior Diff value measures using Orbscan II and Pentacam that can help eye care practitioners clinically diagnose subclinical keratoconus.Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia2020-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492020000200092Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.83 n.2 2020reponame:Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)instname:Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)instacron:CBO10.5935/0004-2749.20200015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZhao,HaixiaYang,ZhaopingHan,XiaotongGuan,WenyingWang,ZhaogeCai,MeilanSun,YiGe,RuichunWang,Ruifangeng2020-03-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-27492020000200092Revistahttp://aboonline.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpaboonline@cbo.com.br||abo@cbo.com.br1678-29250004-2749opendoar:2020-03-10T00:00Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) - Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Corneal differences between healthy and subclinical patients assessed using two diferente corneal tomographers
title Corneal differences between healthy and subclinical patients assessed using two diferente corneal tomographers
spellingShingle Corneal differences between healthy and subclinical patients assessed using two diferente corneal tomographers
Zhao,Haixia
Keratoconus/diagnosis
Corneal topography
Cornea/diagnostic imaging
Diagnostic imaging/methods
Comparative study
title_short Corneal differences between healthy and subclinical patients assessed using two diferente corneal tomographers
title_full Corneal differences between healthy and subclinical patients assessed using two diferente corneal tomographers
title_fullStr Corneal differences between healthy and subclinical patients assessed using two diferente corneal tomographers
title_full_unstemmed Corneal differences between healthy and subclinical patients assessed using two diferente corneal tomographers
title_sort Corneal differences between healthy and subclinical patients assessed using two diferente corneal tomographers
author Zhao,Haixia
author_facet Zhao,Haixia
Yang,Zhaoping
Han,Xiaotong
Guan,Wenying
Wang,Zhaoge
Cai,Meilan
Sun,Yi
Ge,Ruichun
Wang,Ruifang
author_role author
author2 Yang,Zhaoping
Han,Xiaotong
Guan,Wenying
Wang,Zhaoge
Cai,Meilan
Sun,Yi
Ge,Ruichun
Wang,Ruifang
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zhao,Haixia
Yang,Zhaoping
Han,Xiaotong
Guan,Wenying
Wang,Zhaoge
Cai,Meilan
Sun,Yi
Ge,Ruichun
Wang,Ruifang
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Keratoconus/diagnosis
Corneal topography
Cornea/diagnostic imaging
Diagnostic imaging/methods
Comparative study
topic Keratoconus/diagnosis
Corneal topography
Cornea/diagnostic imaging
Diagnostic imaging/methods
Comparative study
description ABSTRACT Purpose: To analyze subclinical keratoconus topography indexes using Pentacam and Orbscan-II measurements to identify evidences for seeking sensitive indexes to screen and diagnose subclinical keratoconus. Methods: Fifty healthy participants (50 eyes) and 40 patients with subclinical keratoconus (40 eyes) were included. Seven common parameters including corneal thickness at the thinnest point; minimum curvature of the front surface (minimum simulated keratometry value, SimK’s Min); maximum curvature of the front surface (maximum simulated keratometry value, SimK’s Max); the frontal corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of the curvature; the back corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of curvature; the anterior corneal surface height (anterior Diff value); and the posterior corneal surface height (posterior Diff value) measured by Pentacam and Orbscan-II between normal and subclinical keratoconus eyes were compared. Results: Statistical differences between the healthy and subclinical keratoconus groups (p<0.01) were found in all corneal parameters measured using both devices. Differences in the minimum curvature of the front surface (SimK’s Min), thinnest point, anterior Diff value, and posterior Diff value were significant between Pentacam and Orbscan-II in the subclinical keratoconus group (p<0.05). Conclusion: The findings of this study identify the differences between normal and subclinical keratoconus eyes at the minimum curvature of the front surface, maximum curvature of the front surface, frontal corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of curvature, back corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of curvature, Anterior Diff value, and Posterior Diff value measures using Orbscan II and Pentacam that can help eye care practitioners clinically diagnose subclinical keratoconus.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492020000200092
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492020000200092
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/0004-2749.20200015
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.83 n.2 2020
reponame:Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
instname:Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
instacron:CBO
instname_str Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
instacron_str CBO
institution CBO
reponame_str Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
collection Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) - Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv aboonline@cbo.com.br||abo@cbo.com.br
_version_ 1754209030469844992