Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitraz
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612013000400495 |
Resumo: | Field samples of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus from the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, were assessed using the following methods: larval packet test (LPT), larval immersion test (LIT) and syringe immersion test (SIT). The following parameters were determined for each population and for the Mozo susceptible reference strain: lethal concentration for 50% (LC50) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI), regression line slope and resistance ratio (RR). Using the LPT, only one population was susceptible to amitraz, presenting a RR of 1.9. Using the same technique, the other populations presented RRs of between 92.9 and 3445.8 and were considered resistant. The LC50 of the Mozo strain calculated using the LPT, LIT and SIT was 2.9, 27.3, and 52.7 µg/mL, respectively. In general, a good fit to the probit statistical model was only achieved using the LPT. The results obtained in this study impair recommendations for using the LIT and SIT to diagnose amitraz resistance in R. (B.) microplus populations. Additional studies are required to improve the sensitivity of these tests in relation to the LPT. |
id |
CBPV-1_8e76220b7823fac2b502602543480b13 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1984-29612013000400495 |
network_acronym_str |
CBPV-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitrazRhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplusamitrazbioassaysresistance diagnosisField samples of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus from the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, were assessed using the following methods: larval packet test (LPT), larval immersion test (LIT) and syringe immersion test (SIT). The following parameters were determined for each population and for the Mozo susceptible reference strain: lethal concentration for 50% (LC50) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI), regression line slope and resistance ratio (RR). Using the LPT, only one population was susceptible to amitraz, presenting a RR of 1.9. Using the same technique, the other populations presented RRs of between 92.9 and 3445.8 and were considered resistant. The LC50 of the Mozo strain calculated using the LPT, LIT and SIT was 2.9, 27.3, and 52.7 µg/mL, respectively. In general, a good fit to the probit statistical model was only achieved using the LPT. The results obtained in this study impair recommendations for using the LIT and SIT to diagnose amitraz resistance in R. (B.) microplus populations. Additional studies are required to improve the sensitivity of these tests in relation to the LPT.Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária2013-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612013000400495Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária v.22 n.4 2013reponame:Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV)instacron:CBPV10.1590/S1984-29612013000400008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,Tânia Regina BettinKlafke,Guilherme MarcondesPappen,Felipe GeraldoNizoli,Leandro QuintanaBiegelmeyer,PatríciaFarias,Nara Amélia Rosaeng2015-11-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1984-29612013000400495Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&lng=pt&pid=1984-2961https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||zacariascbpv@fcav.unesp.br1984-29610103-846Xopendoar:2015-11-24T00:00Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitraz |
title |
Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitraz |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitraz Santos,Tânia Regina Bettin Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus amitraz bioassays resistance diagnosis |
title_short |
Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitraz |
title_full |
Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitraz |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitraz |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitraz |
title_sort |
Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitraz |
author |
Santos,Tânia Regina Bettin |
author_facet |
Santos,Tânia Regina Bettin Klafke,Guilherme Marcondes Pappen,Felipe Geraldo Nizoli,Leandro Quintana Biegelmeyer,Patrícia Farias,Nara Amélia Rosa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Klafke,Guilherme Marcondes Pappen,Felipe Geraldo Nizoli,Leandro Quintana Biegelmeyer,Patrícia Farias,Nara Amélia Rosa |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos,Tânia Regina Bettin Klafke,Guilherme Marcondes Pappen,Felipe Geraldo Nizoli,Leandro Quintana Biegelmeyer,Patrícia Farias,Nara Amélia Rosa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus amitraz bioassays resistance diagnosis |
topic |
Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus amitraz bioassays resistance diagnosis |
description |
Field samples of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus from the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, were assessed using the following methods: larval packet test (LPT), larval immersion test (LIT) and syringe immersion test (SIT). The following parameters were determined for each population and for the Mozo susceptible reference strain: lethal concentration for 50% (LC50) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI), regression line slope and resistance ratio (RR). Using the LPT, only one population was susceptible to amitraz, presenting a RR of 1.9. Using the same technique, the other populations presented RRs of between 92.9 and 3445.8 and were considered resistant. The LC50 of the Mozo strain calculated using the LPT, LIT and SIT was 2.9, 27.3, and 52.7 µg/mL, respectively. In general, a good fit to the probit statistical model was only achieved using the LPT. The results obtained in this study impair recommendations for using the LIT and SIT to diagnose amitraz resistance in R. (B.) microplus populations. Additional studies are required to improve the sensitivity of these tests in relation to the LPT. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612013000400495 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612013000400495 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1984-29612013000400008 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária v.22 n.4 2013 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV) instacron:CBPV |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV) |
instacron_str |
CBPV |
institution |
CBPV |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||zacariascbpv@fcav.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1754208914864340992 |