Acaricidal effect of major compounds to control Rhipicephalus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) in dairy cows and possible alternatives for reversing multidrug resistance

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dolenga,Carla Juliana Ribeiro
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Anjos,Alan dos, Barbosa,Victor Hugo Granza, Yoshitani,Ursula Yaeko, Castilho,Prisciane Leme da Silva Piuci, Miyakawa,Vanessa Issuzu, Molento,Marcelo Beltrão
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612022000200307
Resumo: Abstract Tick control represent a great challenge to animal health. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of acaricidal compounds against Rhipicephalus microplus from dairy cattle systems in Paraná State, Brazil. Six farms (PR1-PR6) were selected, where anti-tick products were applied at fixed intervals. Two other farms that adopted alternative protocols; target selective treatment (PRS), and individual-based agroecological protocol (PRA) were also included in the trial. Fully engorged R. microplus were collected for the in vitro adult immersion test (AIT), and the egg hatch test (EHT) in all eight populations. The larval packet test (LPT) was used on PR6 and PRA tick populations. The treatment groups were composed of G1: dichlorvos 45% plus cypermethrin 5%, G2: deltamethrin 2.5%, G3: cypermethrin 15%, chlorpyriphos 25%, plus citronellal 1%, and G4: amitraz 12.5%. The efficacy at PR1 to PR6 revealed that G3 and G4 achieved moderate to high efficacy, from 75.0 to 100.0% and 73 to 98%, respectively. In the LPT, the efficacy at PR6 was 76.0, 67.0, 93.0 and 30.6%, while PRA presented 100.0, 100.0, 100.0, and 54.0%, for G1, G2, G3 and G4, respectively. Sustainable parasite control strategies are discussed.
id CBPV-1_be304c5dbea94172b5d208439bc30750
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1984-29612022000200307
network_acronym_str CBPV-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Acaricidal effect of major compounds to control Rhipicephalus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) in dairy cows and possible alternatives for reversing multidrug resistanceAdult immersion testectoparasite resistancecattle tickruminantssustainable farmingAbstract Tick control represent a great challenge to animal health. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of acaricidal compounds against Rhipicephalus microplus from dairy cattle systems in Paraná State, Brazil. Six farms (PR1-PR6) were selected, where anti-tick products were applied at fixed intervals. Two other farms that adopted alternative protocols; target selective treatment (PRS), and individual-based agroecological protocol (PRA) were also included in the trial. Fully engorged R. microplus were collected for the in vitro adult immersion test (AIT), and the egg hatch test (EHT) in all eight populations. The larval packet test (LPT) was used on PR6 and PRA tick populations. The treatment groups were composed of G1: dichlorvos 45% plus cypermethrin 5%, G2: deltamethrin 2.5%, G3: cypermethrin 15%, chlorpyriphos 25%, plus citronellal 1%, and G4: amitraz 12.5%. The efficacy at PR1 to PR6 revealed that G3 and G4 achieved moderate to high efficacy, from 75.0 to 100.0% and 73 to 98%, respectively. In the LPT, the efficacy at PR6 was 76.0, 67.0, 93.0 and 30.6%, while PRA presented 100.0, 100.0, 100.0, and 54.0%, for G1, G2, G3 and G4, respectively. Sustainable parasite control strategies are discussed.Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612022000200307Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária v.31 n.2 2022reponame:Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV)instacron:CBPV10.1590/s1984-29612022028info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDolenga,Carla Juliana RibeiroAnjos,Alan dosBarbosa,Victor Hugo GranzaYoshitani,Ursula YaekoCastilho,Prisciane Leme da Silva PiuciMiyakawa,Vanessa IssuzuMolento,Marcelo Beltrãoeng2022-05-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1984-29612022000200307Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&lng=pt&pid=1984-2961https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||zacariascbpv@fcav.unesp.br1984-29610103-846Xopendoar:2022-05-24T00:00Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Acaricidal effect of major compounds to control Rhipicephalus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) in dairy cows and possible alternatives for reversing multidrug resistance
title Acaricidal effect of major compounds to control Rhipicephalus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) in dairy cows and possible alternatives for reversing multidrug resistance
spellingShingle Acaricidal effect of major compounds to control Rhipicephalus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) in dairy cows and possible alternatives for reversing multidrug resistance
Dolenga,Carla Juliana Ribeiro
Adult immersion test
ectoparasite resistance
cattle tick
ruminants
sustainable farming
title_short Acaricidal effect of major compounds to control Rhipicephalus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) in dairy cows and possible alternatives for reversing multidrug resistance
title_full Acaricidal effect of major compounds to control Rhipicephalus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) in dairy cows and possible alternatives for reversing multidrug resistance
title_fullStr Acaricidal effect of major compounds to control Rhipicephalus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) in dairy cows and possible alternatives for reversing multidrug resistance
title_full_unstemmed Acaricidal effect of major compounds to control Rhipicephalus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) in dairy cows and possible alternatives for reversing multidrug resistance
title_sort Acaricidal effect of major compounds to control Rhipicephalus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) in dairy cows and possible alternatives for reversing multidrug resistance
author Dolenga,Carla Juliana Ribeiro
author_facet Dolenga,Carla Juliana Ribeiro
Anjos,Alan dos
Barbosa,Victor Hugo Granza
Yoshitani,Ursula Yaeko
Castilho,Prisciane Leme da Silva Piuci
Miyakawa,Vanessa Issuzu
Molento,Marcelo Beltrão
author_role author
author2 Anjos,Alan dos
Barbosa,Victor Hugo Granza
Yoshitani,Ursula Yaeko
Castilho,Prisciane Leme da Silva Piuci
Miyakawa,Vanessa Issuzu
Molento,Marcelo Beltrão
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dolenga,Carla Juliana Ribeiro
Anjos,Alan dos
Barbosa,Victor Hugo Granza
Yoshitani,Ursula Yaeko
Castilho,Prisciane Leme da Silva Piuci
Miyakawa,Vanessa Issuzu
Molento,Marcelo Beltrão
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adult immersion test
ectoparasite resistance
cattle tick
ruminants
sustainable farming
topic Adult immersion test
ectoparasite resistance
cattle tick
ruminants
sustainable farming
description Abstract Tick control represent a great challenge to animal health. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of acaricidal compounds against Rhipicephalus microplus from dairy cattle systems in Paraná State, Brazil. Six farms (PR1-PR6) were selected, where anti-tick products were applied at fixed intervals. Two other farms that adopted alternative protocols; target selective treatment (PRS), and individual-based agroecological protocol (PRA) were also included in the trial. Fully engorged R. microplus were collected for the in vitro adult immersion test (AIT), and the egg hatch test (EHT) in all eight populations. The larval packet test (LPT) was used on PR6 and PRA tick populations. The treatment groups were composed of G1: dichlorvos 45% plus cypermethrin 5%, G2: deltamethrin 2.5%, G3: cypermethrin 15%, chlorpyriphos 25%, plus citronellal 1%, and G4: amitraz 12.5%. The efficacy at PR1 to PR6 revealed that G3 and G4 achieved moderate to high efficacy, from 75.0 to 100.0% and 73 to 98%, respectively. In the LPT, the efficacy at PR6 was 76.0, 67.0, 93.0 and 30.6%, while PRA presented 100.0, 100.0, 100.0, and 54.0%, for G1, G2, G3 and G4, respectively. Sustainable parasite control strategies are discussed.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612022000200307
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612022000200307
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1984-29612022028
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária v.31 n.2 2022
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV)
instacron:CBPV
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV)
instacron_str CBPV
institution CBPV
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||zacariascbpv@fcav.unesp.br
_version_ 1754208919300866048