Anthelmintic resistance of Haemonchus contortus from sheep flocks in Brazil: concordance of in vivo and in vitro (RESISTA-Test©) methods
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612021000200300 |
Resumo: | Abstract This study evaluated the resistance status of Haemonchus contortus from sheep flocks in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, through comparison between the fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) and the larval development test (LDT). For the FECRT, 35 sheep were selected in each of five flocks and divided into groups treated with: benzimidazole, levamisole, ivermectin, monepantel and control. Feces were collected for EPG and fecal cultures. The LDT was performed using thiabendazole (TBZ), levamisole (LEV), ivermectin aglycone (IVM-A) and Zolvix (ZLV). Resistance to all drugs was detected using FECRT in 100% of the flocks, except in relation to ZLV (40% resistant and 20% suspected of resistance). LDT indicated resistance to TBZ and IVM-A in all flocks, to LEV in 80% of flocks and to ZLV in 10%. Total agreement was obtained between the two tests for TBZ and IVM (k = 1.0), while for LEV (k = 0.8) and ZLV (k = 0.9), substantial and almost perfect agreement were obtained, respectively. The concordance between the tests was significant, thus showing that it is possible to use the outcome of the LDT to predict the FECRT, and hence validating the former as a fast diagnostic test for use by sheep farmers in Brazil. |
id |
CBPV-1_e89e8337630a21ca667028b80d40f1dd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1984-29612021000200300 |
network_acronym_str |
CBPV-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Anthelmintic resistance of Haemonchus contortus from sheep flocks in Brazil: concordance of in vivo and in vitro (RESISTA-Test©) methodsAnthelmintic resistanceFECRTlaboratory diagnosisRESISTA-Test©small ruminantsAbstract This study evaluated the resistance status of Haemonchus contortus from sheep flocks in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, through comparison between the fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) and the larval development test (LDT). For the FECRT, 35 sheep were selected in each of five flocks and divided into groups treated with: benzimidazole, levamisole, ivermectin, monepantel and control. Feces were collected for EPG and fecal cultures. The LDT was performed using thiabendazole (TBZ), levamisole (LEV), ivermectin aglycone (IVM-A) and Zolvix (ZLV). Resistance to all drugs was detected using FECRT in 100% of the flocks, except in relation to ZLV (40% resistant and 20% suspected of resistance). LDT indicated resistance to TBZ and IVM-A in all flocks, to LEV in 80% of flocks and to ZLV in 10%. Total agreement was obtained between the two tests for TBZ and IVM (k = 1.0), while for LEV (k = 0.8) and ZLV (k = 0.9), substantial and almost perfect agreement were obtained, respectively. The concordance between the tests was significant, thus showing that it is possible to use the outcome of the LDT to predict the FECRT, and hence validating the former as a fast diagnostic test for use by sheep farmers in Brazil.Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612021000200300Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária v.30 n.2 2021reponame:Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV)instacron:CBPV10.1590/s1984-296120201093info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGainza,Yousmel AlemánSantos,Isabella Barbosa dosFigueiredo,AmandaSantos,Leonardo Aparecido Lima dosEsteves,Sérgio NovitaBarioni-Junior,WaldomiroMinho,Alessandro PelegrineChagas,Ana Carolina de Souzaeng2021-04-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1984-29612021000200300Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&lng=pt&pid=1984-2961https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||zacariascbpv@fcav.unesp.br1984-29610103-846Xopendoar:2021-04-29T00:00Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Anthelmintic resistance of Haemonchus contortus from sheep flocks in Brazil: concordance of in vivo and in vitro (RESISTA-Test©) methods |
title |
Anthelmintic resistance of Haemonchus contortus from sheep flocks in Brazil: concordance of in vivo and in vitro (RESISTA-Test©) methods |
spellingShingle |
Anthelmintic resistance of Haemonchus contortus from sheep flocks in Brazil: concordance of in vivo and in vitro (RESISTA-Test©) methods Gainza,Yousmel Alemán Anthelmintic resistance FECRT laboratory diagnosis RESISTA-Test© small ruminants |
title_short |
Anthelmintic resistance of Haemonchus contortus from sheep flocks in Brazil: concordance of in vivo and in vitro (RESISTA-Test©) methods |
title_full |
Anthelmintic resistance of Haemonchus contortus from sheep flocks in Brazil: concordance of in vivo and in vitro (RESISTA-Test©) methods |
title_fullStr |
Anthelmintic resistance of Haemonchus contortus from sheep flocks in Brazil: concordance of in vivo and in vitro (RESISTA-Test©) methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anthelmintic resistance of Haemonchus contortus from sheep flocks in Brazil: concordance of in vivo and in vitro (RESISTA-Test©) methods |
title_sort |
Anthelmintic resistance of Haemonchus contortus from sheep flocks in Brazil: concordance of in vivo and in vitro (RESISTA-Test©) methods |
author |
Gainza,Yousmel Alemán |
author_facet |
Gainza,Yousmel Alemán Santos,Isabella Barbosa dos Figueiredo,Amanda Santos,Leonardo Aparecido Lima dos Esteves,Sérgio Novita Barioni-Junior,Waldomiro Minho,Alessandro Pelegrine Chagas,Ana Carolina de Souza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos,Isabella Barbosa dos Figueiredo,Amanda Santos,Leonardo Aparecido Lima dos Esteves,Sérgio Novita Barioni-Junior,Waldomiro Minho,Alessandro Pelegrine Chagas,Ana Carolina de Souza |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gainza,Yousmel Alemán Santos,Isabella Barbosa dos Figueiredo,Amanda Santos,Leonardo Aparecido Lima dos Esteves,Sérgio Novita Barioni-Junior,Waldomiro Minho,Alessandro Pelegrine Chagas,Ana Carolina de Souza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Anthelmintic resistance FECRT laboratory diagnosis RESISTA-Test© small ruminants |
topic |
Anthelmintic resistance FECRT laboratory diagnosis RESISTA-Test© small ruminants |
description |
Abstract This study evaluated the resistance status of Haemonchus contortus from sheep flocks in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, through comparison between the fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) and the larval development test (LDT). For the FECRT, 35 sheep were selected in each of five flocks and divided into groups treated with: benzimidazole, levamisole, ivermectin, monepantel and control. Feces were collected for EPG and fecal cultures. The LDT was performed using thiabendazole (TBZ), levamisole (LEV), ivermectin aglycone (IVM-A) and Zolvix (ZLV). Resistance to all drugs was detected using FECRT in 100% of the flocks, except in relation to ZLV (40% resistant and 20% suspected of resistance). LDT indicated resistance to TBZ and IVM-A in all flocks, to LEV in 80% of flocks and to ZLV in 10%. Total agreement was obtained between the two tests for TBZ and IVM (k = 1.0), while for LEV (k = 0.8) and ZLV (k = 0.9), substantial and almost perfect agreement were obtained, respectively. The concordance between the tests was significant, thus showing that it is possible to use the outcome of the LDT to predict the FECRT, and hence validating the former as a fast diagnostic test for use by sheep farmers in Brazil. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612021000200300 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612021000200300 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s1984-296120201093 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária v.30 n.2 2021 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV) instacron:CBPV |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV) |
instacron_str |
CBPV |
institution |
CBPV |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||zacariascbpv@fcav.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1754208919158259712 |