Comparative evaluation of several methods for Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis diagnosis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Diogo Tiago da
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Starke-Buzetti,Wilma Aparecida, Alves-Martin,Maria Fernanda, Paixão,Mirian dos Santos, Tenório,Michely da Silva, Lopes,Mara Lúcia Martins
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612014000200179
Resumo: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the serological methods using ELISA with recombinant-rK39 (ELISA-rK-39) and soluble extract-SE (ELISA-SE) antigens, the indirect fluorescence antibody test (IFAT) in comparison to an immunochromatography rapid diagnostic test (RDT-rK39) and with a direct parasitological exam (PA) for Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis (CVL) diagnosis. The results showed that 89% (60/67) of the dogs were positive for at least one serological diagnostic test. ELISA-SE was the test that detected anti-Leishmania antibodies in the serum of the highest number of dogs (71.6%) followed by ELISA-rK39 (65.7%), IFAT (65.7%) and RDT-rK39 (55.2%). PA detected the lowest numbers (40.3%) of positive dogs. In relation to the total of examined dogs, the Kappa indexes (p ≤ 0.05) showed a good agreement between ELISA-SE and IFAT (88.1%; k = 0.7237), and it was also observed in the comparison of RDT-rK39 with ELISA-SE (83.6%, k= 0.6561), IFAT (83.5%, k= 0.6605) and PA (85.0%, k= 0.7074). A bad agreement was detected in any association of ELISA-rk39 with the other tests in either symptomatic or asymptomatic animals. ELISA as well as RDT using recombinant antigenic protein (rK39) were the methods that detected the lowest prevalence rates (33.3%) of CVL in asymptomatic dogs. In conclusion, only one test does not adequately identify dogs with CVL and it is necessary the association of two or more diagnostic tests. Because of the good agreement indexes of RDT-rK39 when evaluated with ELISA-SE, IFAT and PA it was suggested as a complementary method to be used in association with either ELISA-SE or IFAT, particularly in the symptomatic dogs. Furthermore, new studies are recommended in order to improve the sensitivity of tests mainly for asymptomatic dogs.
id CBPV-1_fd8e46e6fa0881f59ba64ac7460dfb3f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1984-29612014000200179
network_acronym_str CBPV-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative evaluation of several methods for Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis diagnosisCVLdiagnosisdogsLeishmania infantumrK39RDTThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the serological methods using ELISA with recombinant-rK39 (ELISA-rK-39) and soluble extract-SE (ELISA-SE) antigens, the indirect fluorescence antibody test (IFAT) in comparison to an immunochromatography rapid diagnostic test (RDT-rK39) and with a direct parasitological exam (PA) for Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis (CVL) diagnosis. The results showed that 89% (60/67) of the dogs were positive for at least one serological diagnostic test. ELISA-SE was the test that detected anti-Leishmania antibodies in the serum of the highest number of dogs (71.6%) followed by ELISA-rK39 (65.7%), IFAT (65.7%) and RDT-rK39 (55.2%). PA detected the lowest numbers (40.3%) of positive dogs. In relation to the total of examined dogs, the Kappa indexes (p ≤ 0.05) showed a good agreement between ELISA-SE and IFAT (88.1%; k = 0.7237), and it was also observed in the comparison of RDT-rK39 with ELISA-SE (83.6%, k= 0.6561), IFAT (83.5%, k= 0.6605) and PA (85.0%, k= 0.7074). A bad agreement was detected in any association of ELISA-rk39 with the other tests in either symptomatic or asymptomatic animals. ELISA as well as RDT using recombinant antigenic protein (rK39) were the methods that detected the lowest prevalence rates (33.3%) of CVL in asymptomatic dogs. In conclusion, only one test does not adequately identify dogs with CVL and it is necessary the association of two or more diagnostic tests. Because of the good agreement indexes of RDT-rK39 when evaluated with ELISA-SE, IFAT and PA it was suggested as a complementary method to be used in association with either ELISA-SE or IFAT, particularly in the symptomatic dogs. Furthermore, new studies are recommended in order to improve the sensitivity of tests mainly for asymptomatic dogs.Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária2014-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612014000200179Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária v.23 n.2 2014reponame:Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV)instacron:CBPV10.1590/S1984-29612014033info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Diogo Tiago daStarke-Buzetti,Wilma AparecidaAlves-Martin,Maria FernandaPaixão,Mirian dos SantosTenório,Michely da SilvaLopes,Mara Lúcia Martinseng2015-09-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1984-29612014000200179Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&lng=pt&pid=1984-2961https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||zacariascbpv@fcav.unesp.br1984-29610103-846Xopendoar:2015-09-23T00:00Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative evaluation of several methods for Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis diagnosis
title Comparative evaluation of several methods for Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis diagnosis
spellingShingle Comparative evaluation of several methods for Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis diagnosis
Silva,Diogo Tiago da
CVL
diagnosis
dogs
Leishmania infantum
rK39
RDT
title_short Comparative evaluation of several methods for Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis diagnosis
title_full Comparative evaluation of several methods for Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis diagnosis
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of several methods for Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of several methods for Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis diagnosis
title_sort Comparative evaluation of several methods for Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis diagnosis
author Silva,Diogo Tiago da
author_facet Silva,Diogo Tiago da
Starke-Buzetti,Wilma Aparecida
Alves-Martin,Maria Fernanda
Paixão,Mirian dos Santos
Tenório,Michely da Silva
Lopes,Mara Lúcia Martins
author_role author
author2 Starke-Buzetti,Wilma Aparecida
Alves-Martin,Maria Fernanda
Paixão,Mirian dos Santos
Tenório,Michely da Silva
Lopes,Mara Lúcia Martins
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Diogo Tiago da
Starke-Buzetti,Wilma Aparecida
Alves-Martin,Maria Fernanda
Paixão,Mirian dos Santos
Tenório,Michely da Silva
Lopes,Mara Lúcia Martins
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv CVL
diagnosis
dogs
Leishmania infantum
rK39
RDT
topic CVL
diagnosis
dogs
Leishmania infantum
rK39
RDT
description The aim of the present study was to evaluate the serological methods using ELISA with recombinant-rK39 (ELISA-rK-39) and soluble extract-SE (ELISA-SE) antigens, the indirect fluorescence antibody test (IFAT) in comparison to an immunochromatography rapid diagnostic test (RDT-rK39) and with a direct parasitological exam (PA) for Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis (CVL) diagnosis. The results showed that 89% (60/67) of the dogs were positive for at least one serological diagnostic test. ELISA-SE was the test that detected anti-Leishmania antibodies in the serum of the highest number of dogs (71.6%) followed by ELISA-rK39 (65.7%), IFAT (65.7%) and RDT-rK39 (55.2%). PA detected the lowest numbers (40.3%) of positive dogs. In relation to the total of examined dogs, the Kappa indexes (p ≤ 0.05) showed a good agreement between ELISA-SE and IFAT (88.1%; k = 0.7237), and it was also observed in the comparison of RDT-rK39 with ELISA-SE (83.6%, k= 0.6561), IFAT (83.5%, k= 0.6605) and PA (85.0%, k= 0.7074). A bad agreement was detected in any association of ELISA-rk39 with the other tests in either symptomatic or asymptomatic animals. ELISA as well as RDT using recombinant antigenic protein (rK39) were the methods that detected the lowest prevalence rates (33.3%) of CVL in asymptomatic dogs. In conclusion, only one test does not adequately identify dogs with CVL and it is necessary the association of two or more diagnostic tests. Because of the good agreement indexes of RDT-rK39 when evaluated with ELISA-SE, IFAT and PA it was suggested as a complementary method to be used in association with either ELISA-SE or IFAT, particularly in the symptomatic dogs. Furthermore, new studies are recommended in order to improve the sensitivity of tests mainly for asymptomatic dogs.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612014000200179
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612014000200179
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1984-29612014033
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária v.23 n.2 2014
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV)
instacron:CBPV
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV)
instacron_str CBPV
institution CBPV
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (CBPV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||zacariascbpv@fcav.unesp.br
_version_ 1754208915224002560