Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Etchebehere,Elba
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Brito,Ana Emília, Kairemo,Kalevi, Rohren,Eric, Araujo,John, Macapinlac,Homer
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842019000100033
Resumo: Abstract Objective: To determine whether an interim 18F-fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) study performed after the third cycle of radium-223 dichloride (223RaCl2) therapy is able to identify patients that will not respond to treatment. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 34 histologically confirmed cases of hormone-refractory prostate cancer with bone metastasis in patients submitted to 223RaCl2 therapy. All of the patients underwent baseline and interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT studies. The interim study was performed immediately prior to the fourth cycle of 223RaCl2. The skeletal tumor burden-expressed as the total lesion fluoride uptake above a maximum standardized uptake value of 10 (TLF10)-was calculated for the baseline and the interim studies. The percent change in TLF10 between the baseline and interim studies (%TFL10) was calculated as follows: %TFL10 = interim TLF10 - baseline TLF10 / baseline TLF10. End points were overall survival, progression-free survival, and skeletal-related events. Results: The mean age of the patients was 72.4 ± 10.2 years (range, 43.3-88.8 years). The %TLF10 was not able to predict overall survival (p = 0.6320; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.753; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.236-2.401), progression-free survival (p = 0.5908; HR = 1.248; 95% CI: 0.557-2.797) nor time to a bone event (p = 0.5114; HR = 1.588; 95% CI: 0.399-6.312). Conclusion: The skeletal tumor burden on an interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT, performed after three cycles of 223RaCl2, is not able to predict overall survival, progression-free survival, or time to bone event, and should not be performed to monitor response at this time.
id CBR-1_1b02ea3be803424374e915e0d9133f21
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-39842019000100033
network_acronym_str CBR-1
network_name_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy?Sodium fluoridePositron-emission tomography/methodsTomography, X-ray computed/methodsProstatic neoplasmsRadium-223Bone neoplasms/diagnostic imagingTumor burdenAbstract Objective: To determine whether an interim 18F-fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) study performed after the third cycle of radium-223 dichloride (223RaCl2) therapy is able to identify patients that will not respond to treatment. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 34 histologically confirmed cases of hormone-refractory prostate cancer with bone metastasis in patients submitted to 223RaCl2 therapy. All of the patients underwent baseline and interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT studies. The interim study was performed immediately prior to the fourth cycle of 223RaCl2. The skeletal tumor burden-expressed as the total lesion fluoride uptake above a maximum standardized uptake value of 10 (TLF10)-was calculated for the baseline and the interim studies. The percent change in TLF10 between the baseline and interim studies (%TFL10) was calculated as follows: %TFL10 = interim TLF10 - baseline TLF10 / baseline TLF10. End points were overall survival, progression-free survival, and skeletal-related events. Results: The mean age of the patients was 72.4 ± 10.2 years (range, 43.3-88.8 years). The %TLF10 was not able to predict overall survival (p = 0.6320; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.753; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.236-2.401), progression-free survival (p = 0.5908; HR = 1.248; 95% CI: 0.557-2.797) nor time to a bone event (p = 0.5114; HR = 1.588; 95% CI: 0.399-6.312). Conclusion: The skeletal tumor burden on an interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT, performed after three cycles of 223RaCl2, is not able to predict overall survival, progression-free survival, or time to bone event, and should not be performed to monitor response at this time.Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2019-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842019000100033Radiologia Brasileira v.52 n.1 2019reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0178info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEtchebehere,ElbaBrito,Ana EmíliaKairemo,KaleviRohren,EricAraujo,JohnMacapinlac,Homereng2019-02-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842019000100033Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2019-02-21T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy?
title Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy?
spellingShingle Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy?
Etchebehere,Elba
Sodium fluoride
Positron-emission tomography/methods
Tomography, X-ray computed/methods
Prostatic neoplasms
Radium-223
Bone neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
Tumor burden
title_short Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy?
title_full Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy?
title_fullStr Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy?
title_full_unstemmed Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy?
title_sort Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy?
author Etchebehere,Elba
author_facet Etchebehere,Elba
Brito,Ana Emília
Kairemo,Kalevi
Rohren,Eric
Araujo,John
Macapinlac,Homer
author_role author
author2 Brito,Ana Emília
Kairemo,Kalevi
Rohren,Eric
Araujo,John
Macapinlac,Homer
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Etchebehere,Elba
Brito,Ana Emília
Kairemo,Kalevi
Rohren,Eric
Araujo,John
Macapinlac,Homer
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sodium fluoride
Positron-emission tomography/methods
Tomography, X-ray computed/methods
Prostatic neoplasms
Radium-223
Bone neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
Tumor burden
topic Sodium fluoride
Positron-emission tomography/methods
Tomography, X-ray computed/methods
Prostatic neoplasms
Radium-223
Bone neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
Tumor burden
description Abstract Objective: To determine whether an interim 18F-fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) study performed after the third cycle of radium-223 dichloride (223RaCl2) therapy is able to identify patients that will not respond to treatment. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 34 histologically confirmed cases of hormone-refractory prostate cancer with bone metastasis in patients submitted to 223RaCl2 therapy. All of the patients underwent baseline and interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT studies. The interim study was performed immediately prior to the fourth cycle of 223RaCl2. The skeletal tumor burden-expressed as the total lesion fluoride uptake above a maximum standardized uptake value of 10 (TLF10)-was calculated for the baseline and the interim studies. The percent change in TLF10 between the baseline and interim studies (%TFL10) was calculated as follows: %TFL10 = interim TLF10 - baseline TLF10 / baseline TLF10. End points were overall survival, progression-free survival, and skeletal-related events. Results: The mean age of the patients was 72.4 ± 10.2 years (range, 43.3-88.8 years). The %TLF10 was not able to predict overall survival (p = 0.6320; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.753; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.236-2.401), progression-free survival (p = 0.5908; HR = 1.248; 95% CI: 0.557-2.797) nor time to a bone event (p = 0.5114; HR = 1.588; 95% CI: 0.399-6.312). Conclusion: The skeletal tumor burden on an interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT, performed after three cycles of 223RaCl2, is not able to predict overall survival, progression-free survival, or time to bone event, and should not be performed to monitor response at this time.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842019000100033
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842019000100033
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0178
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira v.52 n.1 2019
reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron:CBR
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron_str CBR
institution CBR
reponame_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
collection Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br
_version_ 1754208939848761344