Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842019000100033 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective: To determine whether an interim 18F-fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) study performed after the third cycle of radium-223 dichloride (223RaCl2) therapy is able to identify patients that will not respond to treatment. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 34 histologically confirmed cases of hormone-refractory prostate cancer with bone metastasis in patients submitted to 223RaCl2 therapy. All of the patients underwent baseline and interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT studies. The interim study was performed immediately prior to the fourth cycle of 223RaCl2. The skeletal tumor burden-expressed as the total lesion fluoride uptake above a maximum standardized uptake value of 10 (TLF10)-was calculated for the baseline and the interim studies. The percent change in TLF10 between the baseline and interim studies (%TFL10) was calculated as follows: %TFL10 = interim TLF10 - baseline TLF10 / baseline TLF10. End points were overall survival, progression-free survival, and skeletal-related events. Results: The mean age of the patients was 72.4 ± 10.2 years (range, 43.3-88.8 years). The %TLF10 was not able to predict overall survival (p = 0.6320; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.753; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.236-2.401), progression-free survival (p = 0.5908; HR = 1.248; 95% CI: 0.557-2.797) nor time to a bone event (p = 0.5114; HR = 1.588; 95% CI: 0.399-6.312). Conclusion: The skeletal tumor burden on an interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT, performed after three cycles of 223RaCl2, is not able to predict overall survival, progression-free survival, or time to bone event, and should not be performed to monitor response at this time. |
id |
CBR-1_1b02ea3be803424374e915e0d9133f21 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-39842019000100033 |
network_acronym_str |
CBR-1 |
network_name_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy?Sodium fluoridePositron-emission tomography/methodsTomography, X-ray computed/methodsProstatic neoplasmsRadium-223Bone neoplasms/diagnostic imagingTumor burdenAbstract Objective: To determine whether an interim 18F-fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) study performed after the third cycle of radium-223 dichloride (223RaCl2) therapy is able to identify patients that will not respond to treatment. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 34 histologically confirmed cases of hormone-refractory prostate cancer with bone metastasis in patients submitted to 223RaCl2 therapy. All of the patients underwent baseline and interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT studies. The interim study was performed immediately prior to the fourth cycle of 223RaCl2. The skeletal tumor burden-expressed as the total lesion fluoride uptake above a maximum standardized uptake value of 10 (TLF10)-was calculated for the baseline and the interim studies. The percent change in TLF10 between the baseline and interim studies (%TFL10) was calculated as follows: %TFL10 = interim TLF10 - baseline TLF10 / baseline TLF10. End points were overall survival, progression-free survival, and skeletal-related events. Results: The mean age of the patients was 72.4 ± 10.2 years (range, 43.3-88.8 years). The %TLF10 was not able to predict overall survival (p = 0.6320; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.753; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.236-2.401), progression-free survival (p = 0.5908; HR = 1.248; 95% CI: 0.557-2.797) nor time to a bone event (p = 0.5114; HR = 1.588; 95% CI: 0.399-6.312). Conclusion: The skeletal tumor burden on an interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT, performed after three cycles of 223RaCl2, is not able to predict overall survival, progression-free survival, or time to bone event, and should not be performed to monitor response at this time.Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2019-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842019000100033Radiologia Brasileira v.52 n.1 2019reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0178info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEtchebehere,ElbaBrito,Ana EmíliaKairemo,KaleviRohren,EricAraujo,JohnMacapinlac,Homereng2019-02-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842019000100033Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2019-02-21T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy? |
title |
Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy? |
spellingShingle |
Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy? Etchebehere,Elba Sodium fluoride Positron-emission tomography/methods Tomography, X-ray computed/methods Prostatic neoplasms Radium-223 Bone neoplasms/diagnostic imaging Tumor burden |
title_short |
Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy? |
title_full |
Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy? |
title_fullStr |
Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy? |
title_sort |
Is interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT a predictor of outcomes after radium-223 therapy? |
author |
Etchebehere,Elba |
author_facet |
Etchebehere,Elba Brito,Ana Emília Kairemo,Kalevi Rohren,Eric Araujo,John Macapinlac,Homer |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Brito,Ana Emília Kairemo,Kalevi Rohren,Eric Araujo,John Macapinlac,Homer |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Etchebehere,Elba Brito,Ana Emília Kairemo,Kalevi Rohren,Eric Araujo,John Macapinlac,Homer |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sodium fluoride Positron-emission tomography/methods Tomography, X-ray computed/methods Prostatic neoplasms Radium-223 Bone neoplasms/diagnostic imaging Tumor burden |
topic |
Sodium fluoride Positron-emission tomography/methods Tomography, X-ray computed/methods Prostatic neoplasms Radium-223 Bone neoplasms/diagnostic imaging Tumor burden |
description |
Abstract Objective: To determine whether an interim 18F-fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) study performed after the third cycle of radium-223 dichloride (223RaCl2) therapy is able to identify patients that will not respond to treatment. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 34 histologically confirmed cases of hormone-refractory prostate cancer with bone metastasis in patients submitted to 223RaCl2 therapy. All of the patients underwent baseline and interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT studies. The interim study was performed immediately prior to the fourth cycle of 223RaCl2. The skeletal tumor burden-expressed as the total lesion fluoride uptake above a maximum standardized uptake value of 10 (TLF10)-was calculated for the baseline and the interim studies. The percent change in TLF10 between the baseline and interim studies (%TFL10) was calculated as follows: %TFL10 = interim TLF10 - baseline TLF10 / baseline TLF10. End points were overall survival, progression-free survival, and skeletal-related events. Results: The mean age of the patients was 72.4 ± 10.2 years (range, 43.3-88.8 years). The %TLF10 was not able to predict overall survival (p = 0.6320; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.753; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.236-2.401), progression-free survival (p = 0.5908; HR = 1.248; 95% CI: 0.557-2.797) nor time to a bone event (p = 0.5114; HR = 1.588; 95% CI: 0.399-6.312). Conclusion: The skeletal tumor burden on an interim 18F-fluoride PET/CT, performed after three cycles of 223RaCl2, is not able to predict overall survival, progression-free survival, or time to bone event, and should not be performed to monitor response at this time. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842019000100033 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842019000100033 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0178 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira v.52 n.1 2019 reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online) instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) instacron:CBR |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
instacron_str |
CBR |
institution |
CBR |
reponame_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br |
_version_ |
1754208939848761344 |