Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Castropil,Wagner
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Guimarães,Amisa, Buchpiguel,Carlos Alberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000400225
Resumo: Abstract Objective: To investigate the correlation between tracer uptake on bone scintigraphy and recovery time in patients with tibial stress fracture. Materials and Methods: We evaluated two groups of athletes: those with clinical suspicion and a radiological diagnosis of tibial stress fracture (TSF group, n = 21); and those with no symptoms or evidence of fracture (control group, n = 10). All subjects underwent bone scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging with a maximum interval of 7 days between the assessments. Results: Using the region of interest technique, we obtained a quantitative evaluation index, comparing affected and unaffected legs. The mean uptake of 99mTc-MDP was significantly higher in the TSF group than in the control group (2.54 ± 0.77 vs. 1.05 ± 0.11; p < 0.001). Conclusion: In our sample of athletes, determining the bone scintigraphy uptake indices provided an objective method to estimate the appropriate recovery time after a tibial stress fracture.
id CBR-1_283d9ff3ed9d506b68a72e51913a5166
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-39842018000400225
network_acronym_str CBR-1
network_name_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fractureTibial fracturesAthletesFractures, stressRadionuclide imagingAbstract Objective: To investigate the correlation between tracer uptake on bone scintigraphy and recovery time in patients with tibial stress fracture. Materials and Methods: We evaluated two groups of athletes: those with clinical suspicion and a radiological diagnosis of tibial stress fracture (TSF group, n = 21); and those with no symptoms or evidence of fracture (control group, n = 10). All subjects underwent bone scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging with a maximum interval of 7 days between the assessments. Results: Using the region of interest technique, we obtained a quantitative evaluation index, comparing affected and unaffected legs. The mean uptake of 99mTc-MDP was significantly higher in the TSF group than in the control group (2.54 ± 0.77 vs. 1.05 ± 0.11; p < 0.001). Conclusion: In our sample of athletes, determining the bone scintigraphy uptake indices provided an objective method to estimate the appropriate recovery time after a tibial stress fracture.Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000400225Radiologia Brasileira v.51 n.4 2018reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0028info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCastropil,WagnerGuimarães,AmisaBuchpiguel,Carlos Albertoeng2018-09-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842018000400225Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2018-09-03T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture
title Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture
spellingShingle Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture
Castropil,Wagner
Tibial fractures
Athletes
Fractures, stress
Radionuclide imaging
title_short Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture
title_full Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture
title_fullStr Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture
title_sort Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture
author Castropil,Wagner
author_facet Castropil,Wagner
Guimarães,Amisa
Buchpiguel,Carlos Alberto
author_role author
author2 Guimarães,Amisa
Buchpiguel,Carlos Alberto
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Castropil,Wagner
Guimarães,Amisa
Buchpiguel,Carlos Alberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tibial fractures
Athletes
Fractures, stress
Radionuclide imaging
topic Tibial fractures
Athletes
Fractures, stress
Radionuclide imaging
description Abstract Objective: To investigate the correlation between tracer uptake on bone scintigraphy and recovery time in patients with tibial stress fracture. Materials and Methods: We evaluated two groups of athletes: those with clinical suspicion and a radiological diagnosis of tibial stress fracture (TSF group, n = 21); and those with no symptoms or evidence of fracture (control group, n = 10). All subjects underwent bone scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging with a maximum interval of 7 days between the assessments. Results: Using the region of interest technique, we obtained a quantitative evaluation index, comparing affected and unaffected legs. The mean uptake of 99mTc-MDP was significantly higher in the TSF group than in the control group (2.54 ± 0.77 vs. 1.05 ± 0.11; p < 0.001). Conclusion: In our sample of athletes, determining the bone scintigraphy uptake indices provided an objective method to estimate the appropriate recovery time after a tibial stress fracture.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000400225
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000400225
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0028
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira v.51 n.4 2018
reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron:CBR
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron_str CBR
institution CBR
reponame_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
collection Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br
_version_ 1754208939736563712