Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000400225 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective: To investigate the correlation between tracer uptake on bone scintigraphy and recovery time in patients with tibial stress fracture. Materials and Methods: We evaluated two groups of athletes: those with clinical suspicion and a radiological diagnosis of tibial stress fracture (TSF group, n = 21); and those with no symptoms or evidence of fracture (control group, n = 10). All subjects underwent bone scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging with a maximum interval of 7 days between the assessments. Results: Using the region of interest technique, we obtained a quantitative evaluation index, comparing affected and unaffected legs. The mean uptake of 99mTc-MDP was significantly higher in the TSF group than in the control group (2.54 ± 0.77 vs. 1.05 ± 0.11; p < 0.001). Conclusion: In our sample of athletes, determining the bone scintigraphy uptake indices provided an objective method to estimate the appropriate recovery time after a tibial stress fracture. |
id |
CBR-1_283d9ff3ed9d506b68a72e51913a5166 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-39842018000400225 |
network_acronym_str |
CBR-1 |
network_name_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fractureTibial fracturesAthletesFractures, stressRadionuclide imagingAbstract Objective: To investigate the correlation between tracer uptake on bone scintigraphy and recovery time in patients with tibial stress fracture. Materials and Methods: We evaluated two groups of athletes: those with clinical suspicion and a radiological diagnosis of tibial stress fracture (TSF group, n = 21); and those with no symptoms or evidence of fracture (control group, n = 10). All subjects underwent bone scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging with a maximum interval of 7 days between the assessments. Results: Using the region of interest technique, we obtained a quantitative evaluation index, comparing affected and unaffected legs. The mean uptake of 99mTc-MDP was significantly higher in the TSF group than in the control group (2.54 ± 0.77 vs. 1.05 ± 0.11; p < 0.001). Conclusion: In our sample of athletes, determining the bone scintigraphy uptake indices provided an objective method to estimate the appropriate recovery time after a tibial stress fracture.Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000400225Radiologia Brasileira v.51 n.4 2018reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0028info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCastropil,WagnerGuimarães,AmisaBuchpiguel,Carlos Albertoeng2018-09-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842018000400225Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2018-09-03T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture |
title |
Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture |
spellingShingle |
Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture Castropil,Wagner Tibial fractures Athletes Fractures, stress Radionuclide imaging |
title_short |
Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture |
title_full |
Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture |
title_fullStr |
Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture |
title_sort |
Prognostic value of focal scintigraphic findings in clinically suspected cases of tibial stress fracture |
author |
Castropil,Wagner |
author_facet |
Castropil,Wagner Guimarães,Amisa Buchpiguel,Carlos Alberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Guimarães,Amisa Buchpiguel,Carlos Alberto |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Castropil,Wagner Guimarães,Amisa Buchpiguel,Carlos Alberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Tibial fractures Athletes Fractures, stress Radionuclide imaging |
topic |
Tibial fractures Athletes Fractures, stress Radionuclide imaging |
description |
Abstract Objective: To investigate the correlation between tracer uptake on bone scintigraphy and recovery time in patients with tibial stress fracture. Materials and Methods: We evaluated two groups of athletes: those with clinical suspicion and a radiological diagnosis of tibial stress fracture (TSF group, n = 21); and those with no symptoms or evidence of fracture (control group, n = 10). All subjects underwent bone scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging with a maximum interval of 7 days between the assessments. Results: Using the region of interest technique, we obtained a quantitative evaluation index, comparing affected and unaffected legs. The mean uptake of 99mTc-MDP was significantly higher in the TSF group than in the control group (2.54 ± 0.77 vs. 1.05 ± 0.11; p < 0.001). Conclusion: In our sample of athletes, determining the bone scintigraphy uptake indices provided an objective method to estimate the appropriate recovery time after a tibial stress fracture. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000400225 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000400225 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0028 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira v.51 n.4 2018 reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online) instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) instacron:CBR |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
instacron_str |
CBR |
institution |
CBR |
reponame_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br |
_version_ |
1754208939736563712 |