Evaluation of different magnetic resonance imaging contrast materials to be used as dummy markers in image-guided brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sales,Camila Pessoa
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Carvalho,Heloisa de Andrade, Taverna,Khallil Chaim, Pastorello,Bruno Fraccini, Rubo,Rodrigo Augusto, Borgonovi,Arthur Felipe, Stuart,Silvia Radwanski, Rodrigues,Laura Natal
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842016000300007
Resumo: Abstract Objective: To identify a contrast material that could be used as a dummy marker for magnetic resonance imaging. Materials and Methods: Magnetic resonance images were acquired with six different catheter-filling materials-water, glucose 50%, saline, olive oil, glycerin, and copper sulfate (CuSO4) water solution (2.08 g/L)-inserted into compatible computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging ring applicators placed in a phantom made of gelatin and CuSO4. The best contrast media were tested in four patients with the applicators in place. Results: In T2-weighted sequences, the best contrast was achieved with the CuSO4-filled catheters, followed by saline- and glycerin-filled catheters, which presented poor visualization. In addition (also in T2-weighted sequences), CuSO4 presented better contrast when tested in the phantom than when tested in the patients, in which it provided some contrast but with poor identification of the first dwell position, mainly in the ring. Conclusion: We found CuSO4 to be the best solution for visualization of the applicator channels, mainly in T2-weighted images in vitro, although the materials tested presented low signal intensity in the images obtained in vivo, as well as poor precision in determining the first dwell position.
id CBR-1_28a6d1c8b97471a53222b6e53102fb7b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-39842016000300007
network_acronym_str CBR-1
network_name_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of different magnetic resonance imaging contrast materials to be used as dummy markers in image-guided brachytherapy for gynecologic malignanciesImaging, three-dimensionalBrachytherapy/methodsDiagnostic techniques, obstetrical and gynecologicalMagnetic resonance imaging/methodsContrast mediaAbstract Objective: To identify a contrast material that could be used as a dummy marker for magnetic resonance imaging. Materials and Methods: Magnetic resonance images were acquired with six different catheter-filling materials-water, glucose 50%, saline, olive oil, glycerin, and copper sulfate (CuSO4) water solution (2.08 g/L)-inserted into compatible computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging ring applicators placed in a phantom made of gelatin and CuSO4. The best contrast media were tested in four patients with the applicators in place. Results: In T2-weighted sequences, the best contrast was achieved with the CuSO4-filled catheters, followed by saline- and glycerin-filled catheters, which presented poor visualization. In addition (also in T2-weighted sequences), CuSO4 presented better contrast when tested in the phantom than when tested in the patients, in which it provided some contrast but with poor identification of the first dwell position, mainly in the ring. Conclusion: We found CuSO4 to be the best solution for visualization of the applicator channels, mainly in T2-weighted images in vitro, although the materials tested presented low signal intensity in the images obtained in vivo, as well as poor precision in determining the first dwell position.Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842016000300007Radiologia Brasileira v.49 n.3 2016reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSales,Camila PessoaCarvalho,Heloisa de AndradeTaverna,Khallil ChaimPastorello,Bruno FracciniRubo,Rodrigo AugustoBorgonovi,Arthur FelipeStuart,Silvia RadwanskiRodrigues,Laura Nataleng2016-07-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842016000300007Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2016-07-12T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of different magnetic resonance imaging contrast materials to be used as dummy markers in image-guided brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies
title Evaluation of different magnetic resonance imaging contrast materials to be used as dummy markers in image-guided brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies
spellingShingle Evaluation of different magnetic resonance imaging contrast materials to be used as dummy markers in image-guided brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies
Sales,Camila Pessoa
Imaging, three-dimensional
Brachytherapy/methods
Diagnostic techniques, obstetrical and gynecological
Magnetic resonance imaging/methods
Contrast media
title_short Evaluation of different magnetic resonance imaging contrast materials to be used as dummy markers in image-guided brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies
title_full Evaluation of different magnetic resonance imaging contrast materials to be used as dummy markers in image-guided brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies
title_fullStr Evaluation of different magnetic resonance imaging contrast materials to be used as dummy markers in image-guided brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different magnetic resonance imaging contrast materials to be used as dummy markers in image-guided brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies
title_sort Evaluation of different magnetic resonance imaging contrast materials to be used as dummy markers in image-guided brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies
author Sales,Camila Pessoa
author_facet Sales,Camila Pessoa
Carvalho,Heloisa de Andrade
Taverna,Khallil Chaim
Pastorello,Bruno Fraccini
Rubo,Rodrigo Augusto
Borgonovi,Arthur Felipe
Stuart,Silvia Radwanski
Rodrigues,Laura Natal
author_role author
author2 Carvalho,Heloisa de Andrade
Taverna,Khallil Chaim
Pastorello,Bruno Fraccini
Rubo,Rodrigo Augusto
Borgonovi,Arthur Felipe
Stuart,Silvia Radwanski
Rodrigues,Laura Natal
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sales,Camila Pessoa
Carvalho,Heloisa de Andrade
Taverna,Khallil Chaim
Pastorello,Bruno Fraccini
Rubo,Rodrigo Augusto
Borgonovi,Arthur Felipe
Stuart,Silvia Radwanski
Rodrigues,Laura Natal
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Imaging, three-dimensional
Brachytherapy/methods
Diagnostic techniques, obstetrical and gynecological
Magnetic resonance imaging/methods
Contrast media
topic Imaging, three-dimensional
Brachytherapy/methods
Diagnostic techniques, obstetrical and gynecological
Magnetic resonance imaging/methods
Contrast media
description Abstract Objective: To identify a contrast material that could be used as a dummy marker for magnetic resonance imaging. Materials and Methods: Magnetic resonance images were acquired with six different catheter-filling materials-water, glucose 50%, saline, olive oil, glycerin, and copper sulfate (CuSO4) water solution (2.08 g/L)-inserted into compatible computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging ring applicators placed in a phantom made of gelatin and CuSO4. The best contrast media were tested in four patients with the applicators in place. Results: In T2-weighted sequences, the best contrast was achieved with the CuSO4-filled catheters, followed by saline- and glycerin-filled catheters, which presented poor visualization. In addition (also in T2-weighted sequences), CuSO4 presented better contrast when tested in the phantom than when tested in the patients, in which it provided some contrast but with poor identification of the first dwell position, mainly in the ring. Conclusion: We found CuSO4 to be the best solution for visualization of the applicator channels, mainly in T2-weighted images in vitro, although the materials tested presented low signal intensity in the images obtained in vivo, as well as poor precision in determining the first dwell position.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842016000300007
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842016000300007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira v.49 n.3 2016
reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron:CBR
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron_str CBR
institution CBR
reponame_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
collection Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br
_version_ 1754208938978443264