Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842014000100028 |
Resumo: | Objective The present study evaluated the reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications. Materials and Methods Thirty-five patients under high-risk for development of carotid artery calcifications who had digital panoramic radiography were referred to undergo ultrasonography. Thus, 70 arteries were assessed by both methods. The main parameters utilized to evaluate the panoramic radiography reliability in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications were accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of this method as compared with ultrasonography. Additionally, the McNemar's test was utilized to verify whether there was a statistically significant difference between digital panoramic radiography and ultrasonography. Results Ultrasonography demonstrated carotid artery calcifications in 17 (48.57%) patients. Such individuals presented with a total of 29 (41.43%) carotid arteries affected by calcification. Radiography was accurate in 71.43% (n = 50) of cases evaluated. The degree of sensitivity of this method was 37.93%, specificity of 95.12% and positive predictive value of 84.61%. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed between the methods evaluated in their capacity to diagnose carotid artery calcifications. Conclusion Digital panoramic radiography should not be indicated as a method of choice in the investigation of carotid artery calcifications. |
id |
CBR-1_6df6ceca382f52b88faa8db25231c2ed |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-39842014000100028 |
network_acronym_str |
CBR-1 |
network_name_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcificationsCarotid artery calcificationEnd-stage renal diseasePanoramic radiographyUltrasonography Objective The present study evaluated the reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications. Materials and Methods Thirty-five patients under high-risk for development of carotid artery calcifications who had digital panoramic radiography were referred to undergo ultrasonography. Thus, 70 arteries were assessed by both methods. The main parameters utilized to evaluate the panoramic radiography reliability in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications were accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of this method as compared with ultrasonography. Additionally, the McNemar's test was utilized to verify whether there was a statistically significant difference between digital panoramic radiography and ultrasonography. Results Ultrasonography demonstrated carotid artery calcifications in 17 (48.57%) patients. Such individuals presented with a total of 29 (41.43%) carotid arteries affected by calcification. Radiography was accurate in 71.43% (n = 50) of cases evaluated. The degree of sensitivity of this method was 37.93%, specificity of 95.12% and positive predictive value of 84.61%. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed between the methods evaluated in their capacity to diagnose carotid artery calcifications. Conclusion Digital panoramic radiography should not be indicated as a method of choice in the investigation of carotid artery calcifications.Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2014-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842014000100028Radiologia Brasileira v.47 n.1 2014reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/S0100-39842014000100011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrasileiro Junior,Vilson LacerdaLuna,Aníbal Henrique BarbosaSales,Marcelo Augusto Oliveira deRodrigues,Tânia Lemos CoelhoSarmento,Priscilla Lopes da Fonseca AbrantesMello Junior,Carlos Fernando deeng2016-03-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842014000100028Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2016-03-24T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications |
title |
Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications |
spellingShingle |
Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications Brasileiro Junior,Vilson Lacerda Carotid artery calcification End-stage renal disease Panoramic radiography Ultrasonography |
title_short |
Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications |
title_full |
Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications |
title_fullStr |
Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications |
title_sort |
Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications |
author |
Brasileiro Junior,Vilson Lacerda |
author_facet |
Brasileiro Junior,Vilson Lacerda Luna,Aníbal Henrique Barbosa Sales,Marcelo Augusto Oliveira de Rodrigues,Tânia Lemos Coelho Sarmento,Priscilla Lopes da Fonseca Abrantes Mello Junior,Carlos Fernando de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Luna,Aníbal Henrique Barbosa Sales,Marcelo Augusto Oliveira de Rodrigues,Tânia Lemos Coelho Sarmento,Priscilla Lopes da Fonseca Abrantes Mello Junior,Carlos Fernando de |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Brasileiro Junior,Vilson Lacerda Luna,Aníbal Henrique Barbosa Sales,Marcelo Augusto Oliveira de Rodrigues,Tânia Lemos Coelho Sarmento,Priscilla Lopes da Fonseca Abrantes Mello Junior,Carlos Fernando de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Carotid artery calcification End-stage renal disease Panoramic radiography Ultrasonography |
topic |
Carotid artery calcification End-stage renal disease Panoramic radiography Ultrasonography |
description |
Objective The present study evaluated the reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications. Materials and Methods Thirty-five patients under high-risk for development of carotid artery calcifications who had digital panoramic radiography were referred to undergo ultrasonography. Thus, 70 arteries were assessed by both methods. The main parameters utilized to evaluate the panoramic radiography reliability in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications were accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of this method as compared with ultrasonography. Additionally, the McNemar's test was utilized to verify whether there was a statistically significant difference between digital panoramic radiography and ultrasonography. Results Ultrasonography demonstrated carotid artery calcifications in 17 (48.57%) patients. Such individuals presented with a total of 29 (41.43%) carotid arteries affected by calcification. Radiography was accurate in 71.43% (n = 50) of cases evaluated. The degree of sensitivity of this method was 37.93%, specificity of 95.12% and positive predictive value of 84.61%. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed between the methods evaluated in their capacity to diagnose carotid artery calcifications. Conclusion Digital panoramic radiography should not be indicated as a method of choice in the investigation of carotid artery calcifications. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842014000100028 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842014000100028 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0100-39842014000100011 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira v.47 n.1 2014 reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online) instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) instacron:CBR |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
instacron_str |
CBR |
institution |
CBR |
reponame_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br |
_version_ |
1754208938506584064 |