Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brasileiro Junior,Vilson Lacerda
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Luna,Aníbal Henrique Barbosa, Sales,Marcelo Augusto Oliveira de, Rodrigues,Tânia Lemos Coelho, Sarmento,Priscilla Lopes da Fonseca Abrantes, Mello Junior,Carlos Fernando de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842014000100028
Resumo: Objective The present study evaluated the reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications. Materials and Methods Thirty-five patients under high-risk for development of carotid artery calcifications who had digital panoramic radiography were referred to undergo ultrasonography. Thus, 70 arteries were assessed by both methods. The main parameters utilized to evaluate the panoramic radiography reliability in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications were accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of this method as compared with ultrasonography. Additionally, the McNemar's test was utilized to verify whether there was a statistically significant difference between digital panoramic radiography and ultrasonography. Results Ultrasonography demonstrated carotid artery calcifications in 17 (48.57%) patients. Such individuals presented with a total of 29 (41.43%) carotid arteries affected by calcification. Radiography was accurate in 71.43% (n = 50) of cases evaluated. The degree of sensitivity of this method was 37.93%, specificity of 95.12% and positive predictive value of 84.61%. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed between the methods evaluated in their capacity to diagnose carotid artery calcifications. Conclusion Digital panoramic radiography should not be indicated as a method of choice in the investigation of carotid artery calcifications.
id CBR-1_6df6ceca382f52b88faa8db25231c2ed
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-39842014000100028
network_acronym_str CBR-1
network_name_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcificationsCarotid artery calcificationEnd-stage renal diseasePanoramic radiographyUltrasonography Objective The present study evaluated the reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications. Materials and Methods Thirty-five patients under high-risk for development of carotid artery calcifications who had digital panoramic radiography were referred to undergo ultrasonography. Thus, 70 arteries were assessed by both methods. The main parameters utilized to evaluate the panoramic radiography reliability in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications were accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of this method as compared with ultrasonography. Additionally, the McNemar's test was utilized to verify whether there was a statistically significant difference between digital panoramic radiography and ultrasonography. Results Ultrasonography demonstrated carotid artery calcifications in 17 (48.57%) patients. Such individuals presented with a total of 29 (41.43%) carotid arteries affected by calcification. Radiography was accurate in 71.43% (n = 50) of cases evaluated. The degree of sensitivity of this method was 37.93%, specificity of 95.12% and positive predictive value of 84.61%. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed between the methods evaluated in their capacity to diagnose carotid artery calcifications. Conclusion Digital panoramic radiography should not be indicated as a method of choice in the investigation of carotid artery calcifications.Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2014-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842014000100028Radiologia Brasileira v.47 n.1 2014reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/S0100-39842014000100011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrasileiro Junior,Vilson LacerdaLuna,Aníbal Henrique BarbosaSales,Marcelo Augusto Oliveira deRodrigues,Tânia Lemos CoelhoSarmento,Priscilla Lopes da Fonseca AbrantesMello Junior,Carlos Fernando deeng2016-03-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842014000100028Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2016-03-24T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications
title Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications
spellingShingle Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications
Brasileiro Junior,Vilson Lacerda
Carotid artery calcification
End-stage renal disease
Panoramic radiography
Ultrasonography
title_short Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications
title_full Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications
title_fullStr Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications
title_sort Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications
author Brasileiro Junior,Vilson Lacerda
author_facet Brasileiro Junior,Vilson Lacerda
Luna,Aníbal Henrique Barbosa
Sales,Marcelo Augusto Oliveira de
Rodrigues,Tânia Lemos Coelho
Sarmento,Priscilla Lopes da Fonseca Abrantes
Mello Junior,Carlos Fernando de
author_role author
author2 Luna,Aníbal Henrique Barbosa
Sales,Marcelo Augusto Oliveira de
Rodrigues,Tânia Lemos Coelho
Sarmento,Priscilla Lopes da Fonseca Abrantes
Mello Junior,Carlos Fernando de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brasileiro Junior,Vilson Lacerda
Luna,Aníbal Henrique Barbosa
Sales,Marcelo Augusto Oliveira de
Rodrigues,Tânia Lemos Coelho
Sarmento,Priscilla Lopes da Fonseca Abrantes
Mello Junior,Carlos Fernando de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Carotid artery calcification
End-stage renal disease
Panoramic radiography
Ultrasonography
topic Carotid artery calcification
End-stage renal disease
Panoramic radiography
Ultrasonography
description Objective The present study evaluated the reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications. Materials and Methods Thirty-five patients under high-risk for development of carotid artery calcifications who had digital panoramic radiography were referred to undergo ultrasonography. Thus, 70 arteries were assessed by both methods. The main parameters utilized to evaluate the panoramic radiography reliability in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications were accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of this method as compared with ultrasonography. Additionally, the McNemar's test was utilized to verify whether there was a statistically significant difference between digital panoramic radiography and ultrasonography. Results Ultrasonography demonstrated carotid artery calcifications in 17 (48.57%) patients. Such individuals presented with a total of 29 (41.43%) carotid arteries affected by calcification. Radiography was accurate in 71.43% (n = 50) of cases evaluated. The degree of sensitivity of this method was 37.93%, specificity of 95.12% and positive predictive value of 84.61%. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed between the methods evaluated in their capacity to diagnose carotid artery calcifications. Conclusion Digital panoramic radiography should not be indicated as a method of choice in the investigation of carotid artery calcifications.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842014000100028
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842014000100028
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-39842014000100011
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira v.47 n.1 2014
reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron:CBR
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron_str CBR
institution CBR
reponame_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
collection Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br
_version_ 1754208938506584064