Intestinal perforation by an ingested foreign body

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nicolodi,Gabriel Cleve
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Trippia,Cesar Rodrigo, Caboclo,Maria Fernanda F. S., Castro,Francisco Gomes de, Miller,Wagner Peitl, Lima,Raphael Rodrigues de, Tazima,Leandro, Geraldo,Jamylle
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842016000500006
Resumo: Abstract Objective: To identify the computed tomography findings suggestive of intestinal perforation by an ingested foreign body. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of four cases of surgically proven intestinal perforation by a foreign body, comparing the computed tomography findings with those described in the literature. Results: None of the patients reported having ingested a foreign body, all were over 60 years of age, three of the four patients used a dental prosthesis, and all of the foreign bodies were elongated and sharp. In all four patients, there were findings indicative of acute abdomen. None of the foreign bodies were identified on conventional X-rays. The computed tomography findings suggestive of perforation were thickening of the intestinal walls (in all four cases), increased density of mesenteric fat (in all four cases), identification of the foreign body passing through the intestinal wall (in three cases), and gas in the peritoneal cavity (in one case). Conclusion: In cases of foreign body ingestion, intestinal perforation is more common when the foreign body is elongated and sharp. Although patients typically do not report having ingested such foreign bodies, the scenario should be suspected in elderly individuals who use dental prostheses. A computed tomography scan can detect foreign bodies, locate perforations, and guide treatment. The findings that suggest perforation are thickening of the intestinal walls, increased mesenteric fat density, and, less frequently, gas in the peritoneal cavity, often restricted to the point of perforation.
id CBR-1_7e3848b852ff6052c21da2ff327d2954
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-39842016000500006
network_acronym_str CBR-1
network_name_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Intestinal perforation by an ingested foreign bodyIntestinal perforationIntestine, smallForeign bodiesAbdomen, acuteTomography, X-ray computedAbstract Objective: To identify the computed tomography findings suggestive of intestinal perforation by an ingested foreign body. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of four cases of surgically proven intestinal perforation by a foreign body, comparing the computed tomography findings with those described in the literature. Results: None of the patients reported having ingested a foreign body, all were over 60 years of age, three of the four patients used a dental prosthesis, and all of the foreign bodies were elongated and sharp. In all four patients, there were findings indicative of acute abdomen. None of the foreign bodies were identified on conventional X-rays. The computed tomography findings suggestive of perforation were thickening of the intestinal walls (in all four cases), increased density of mesenteric fat (in all four cases), identification of the foreign body passing through the intestinal wall (in three cases), and gas in the peritoneal cavity (in one case). Conclusion: In cases of foreign body ingestion, intestinal perforation is more common when the foreign body is elongated and sharp. Although patients typically do not report having ingested such foreign bodies, the scenario should be suspected in elderly individuals who use dental prostheses. A computed tomography scan can detect foreign bodies, locate perforations, and guide treatment. The findings that suggest perforation are thickening of the intestinal walls, increased mesenteric fat density, and, less frequently, gas in the peritoneal cavity, often restricted to the point of perforation.Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842016000500006Radiologia Brasileira v.49 n.5 2016reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0127info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNicolodi,Gabriel CleveTrippia,Cesar RodrigoCaboclo,Maria Fernanda F. S.Castro,Francisco Gomes deMiller,Wagner PeitlLima,Raphael Rodrigues deTazima,LeandroGeraldo,Jamylleeng2016-11-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842016000500006Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2016-11-07T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intestinal perforation by an ingested foreign body
title Intestinal perforation by an ingested foreign body
spellingShingle Intestinal perforation by an ingested foreign body
Nicolodi,Gabriel Cleve
Intestinal perforation
Intestine, small
Foreign bodies
Abdomen, acute
Tomography, X-ray computed
title_short Intestinal perforation by an ingested foreign body
title_full Intestinal perforation by an ingested foreign body
title_fullStr Intestinal perforation by an ingested foreign body
title_full_unstemmed Intestinal perforation by an ingested foreign body
title_sort Intestinal perforation by an ingested foreign body
author Nicolodi,Gabriel Cleve
author_facet Nicolodi,Gabriel Cleve
Trippia,Cesar Rodrigo
Caboclo,Maria Fernanda F. S.
Castro,Francisco Gomes de
Miller,Wagner Peitl
Lima,Raphael Rodrigues de
Tazima,Leandro
Geraldo,Jamylle
author_role author
author2 Trippia,Cesar Rodrigo
Caboclo,Maria Fernanda F. S.
Castro,Francisco Gomes de
Miller,Wagner Peitl
Lima,Raphael Rodrigues de
Tazima,Leandro
Geraldo,Jamylle
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nicolodi,Gabriel Cleve
Trippia,Cesar Rodrigo
Caboclo,Maria Fernanda F. S.
Castro,Francisco Gomes de
Miller,Wagner Peitl
Lima,Raphael Rodrigues de
Tazima,Leandro
Geraldo,Jamylle
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Intestinal perforation
Intestine, small
Foreign bodies
Abdomen, acute
Tomography, X-ray computed
topic Intestinal perforation
Intestine, small
Foreign bodies
Abdomen, acute
Tomography, X-ray computed
description Abstract Objective: To identify the computed tomography findings suggestive of intestinal perforation by an ingested foreign body. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of four cases of surgically proven intestinal perforation by a foreign body, comparing the computed tomography findings with those described in the literature. Results: None of the patients reported having ingested a foreign body, all were over 60 years of age, three of the four patients used a dental prosthesis, and all of the foreign bodies were elongated and sharp. In all four patients, there were findings indicative of acute abdomen. None of the foreign bodies were identified on conventional X-rays. The computed tomography findings suggestive of perforation were thickening of the intestinal walls (in all four cases), increased density of mesenteric fat (in all four cases), identification of the foreign body passing through the intestinal wall (in three cases), and gas in the peritoneal cavity (in one case). Conclusion: In cases of foreign body ingestion, intestinal perforation is more common when the foreign body is elongated and sharp. Although patients typically do not report having ingested such foreign bodies, the scenario should be suspected in elderly individuals who use dental prostheses. A computed tomography scan can detect foreign bodies, locate perforations, and guide treatment. The findings that suggest perforation are thickening of the intestinal walls, increased mesenteric fat density, and, less frequently, gas in the peritoneal cavity, often restricted to the point of perforation.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842016000500006
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842016000500006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0127
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira v.49 n.5 2016
reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron:CBR
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron_str CBR
institution CBR
reponame_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
collection Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br
_version_ 1754208939265753088