Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ignácio,Fernando de Castro Guimarães Rios
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Souza,Luis Ronan Marquez Ferreira de, D’Ippolito,Giuseppe, Garcia,Mayara Martins
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000500308
Resumo: Abstract Objective: To evaluate the opinion and perception of referring physicians regarding the radiology report, in order to develop tools that promote an improvement in its quality. Materials and Methods: We prepared a questionnaire containing ten multiple choice questions about the radiology report, administering it to 70 physicians (35 specialists and 35 residents working in specialties other than radiology). Results: Referring physicians (specialists and residents) showed a preference for structured reports, with a description explained in universal medical language and a complete conclusion listing the diagnostic possibilities with the degree of certainty. The examination technique should be described, and the final report is best presented when it contains the final chart, together with images, as hard copies and in digital format. The respondents also reported having confidence in the opinion of the radiologist and expressed the need for a direct channel of communication with the same. Conclusion: Referring physicians seek detailed reports (including a description of the examination technique), preferably structured, with objective language and relevant conclusions (the position of the radiologist on the case is important). It is necessary to discuss the differential diagnoses and provide a form of contact between the parties. Although referring physicians consider the radiologist opinion relevant, they also want to analyze the images on their own.
id CBR-1_840ae16ad1b11e0f81e6be9757dc264e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-39842018000500308
network_acronym_str CBR-1
network_name_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician?RadiologyRadiology information systemsDiagnostic imagingAbstract Objective: To evaluate the opinion and perception of referring physicians regarding the radiology report, in order to develop tools that promote an improvement in its quality. Materials and Methods: We prepared a questionnaire containing ten multiple choice questions about the radiology report, administering it to 70 physicians (35 specialists and 35 residents working in specialties other than radiology). Results: Referring physicians (specialists and residents) showed a preference for structured reports, with a description explained in universal medical language and a complete conclusion listing the diagnostic possibilities with the degree of certainty. The examination technique should be described, and the final report is best presented when it contains the final chart, together with images, as hard copies and in digital format. The respondents also reported having confidence in the opinion of the radiologist and expressed the need for a direct channel of communication with the same. Conclusion: Referring physicians seek detailed reports (including a description of the examination technique), preferably structured, with objective language and relevant conclusions (the position of the radiologist on the case is important). It is necessary to discuss the differential diagnoses and provide a form of contact between the parties. Although referring physicians consider the radiologist opinion relevant, they also want to analyze the images on their own.Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2018-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000500308Radiologia Brasileira v.51 n.5 2018reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0115info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIgnácio,Fernando de Castro Guimarães RiosSouza,Luis Ronan Marquez Ferreira deD’Ippolito,GiuseppeGarcia,Mayara Martinseng2018-10-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842018000500308Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2018-10-23T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician?
title Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician?
spellingShingle Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician?
Ignácio,Fernando de Castro Guimarães Rios
Radiology
Radiology information systems
Diagnostic imaging
title_short Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician?
title_full Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician?
title_fullStr Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician?
title_full_unstemmed Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician?
title_sort Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician?
author Ignácio,Fernando de Castro Guimarães Rios
author_facet Ignácio,Fernando de Castro Guimarães Rios
Souza,Luis Ronan Marquez Ferreira de
D’Ippolito,Giuseppe
Garcia,Mayara Martins
author_role author
author2 Souza,Luis Ronan Marquez Ferreira de
D’Ippolito,Giuseppe
Garcia,Mayara Martins
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ignácio,Fernando de Castro Guimarães Rios
Souza,Luis Ronan Marquez Ferreira de
D’Ippolito,Giuseppe
Garcia,Mayara Martins
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Radiology
Radiology information systems
Diagnostic imaging
topic Radiology
Radiology information systems
Diagnostic imaging
description Abstract Objective: To evaluate the opinion and perception of referring physicians regarding the radiology report, in order to develop tools that promote an improvement in its quality. Materials and Methods: We prepared a questionnaire containing ten multiple choice questions about the radiology report, administering it to 70 physicians (35 specialists and 35 residents working in specialties other than radiology). Results: Referring physicians (specialists and residents) showed a preference for structured reports, with a description explained in universal medical language and a complete conclusion listing the diagnostic possibilities with the degree of certainty. The examination technique should be described, and the final report is best presented when it contains the final chart, together with images, as hard copies and in digital format. The respondents also reported having confidence in the opinion of the radiologist and expressed the need for a direct channel of communication with the same. Conclusion: Referring physicians seek detailed reports (including a description of the examination technique), preferably structured, with objective language and relevant conclusions (the position of the radiologist on the case is important). It is necessary to discuss the differential diagnoses and provide a form of contact between the parties. Although referring physicians consider the radiologist opinion relevant, they also want to analyze the images on their own.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000500308
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000500308
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0115
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira v.51 n.5 2018
reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron:CBR
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron_str CBR
institution CBR
reponame_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
collection Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br
_version_ 1754208939755438080