Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000500308 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective: To evaluate the opinion and perception of referring physicians regarding the radiology report, in order to develop tools that promote an improvement in its quality. Materials and Methods: We prepared a questionnaire containing ten multiple choice questions about the radiology report, administering it to 70 physicians (35 specialists and 35 residents working in specialties other than radiology). Results: Referring physicians (specialists and residents) showed a preference for structured reports, with a description explained in universal medical language and a complete conclusion listing the diagnostic possibilities with the degree of certainty. The examination technique should be described, and the final report is best presented when it contains the final chart, together with images, as hard copies and in digital format. The respondents also reported having confidence in the opinion of the radiologist and expressed the need for a direct channel of communication with the same. Conclusion: Referring physicians seek detailed reports (including a description of the examination technique), preferably structured, with objective language and relevant conclusions (the position of the radiologist on the case is important). It is necessary to discuss the differential diagnoses and provide a form of contact between the parties. Although referring physicians consider the radiologist opinion relevant, they also want to analyze the images on their own. |
id |
CBR-1_840ae16ad1b11e0f81e6be9757dc264e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-39842018000500308 |
network_acronym_str |
CBR-1 |
network_name_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician?RadiologyRadiology information systemsDiagnostic imagingAbstract Objective: To evaluate the opinion and perception of referring physicians regarding the radiology report, in order to develop tools that promote an improvement in its quality. Materials and Methods: We prepared a questionnaire containing ten multiple choice questions about the radiology report, administering it to 70 physicians (35 specialists and 35 residents working in specialties other than radiology). Results: Referring physicians (specialists and residents) showed a preference for structured reports, with a description explained in universal medical language and a complete conclusion listing the diagnostic possibilities with the degree of certainty. The examination technique should be described, and the final report is best presented when it contains the final chart, together with images, as hard copies and in digital format. The respondents also reported having confidence in the opinion of the radiologist and expressed the need for a direct channel of communication with the same. Conclusion: Referring physicians seek detailed reports (including a description of the examination technique), preferably structured, with objective language and relevant conclusions (the position of the radiologist on the case is important). It is necessary to discuss the differential diagnoses and provide a form of contact between the parties. Although referring physicians consider the radiologist opinion relevant, they also want to analyze the images on their own.Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2018-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000500308Radiologia Brasileira v.51 n.5 2018reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0115info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIgnácio,Fernando de Castro Guimarães RiosSouza,Luis Ronan Marquez Ferreira deD’Ippolito,GiuseppeGarcia,Mayara Martinseng2018-10-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842018000500308Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2018-10-23T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician? |
title |
Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician? |
spellingShingle |
Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician? Ignácio,Fernando de Castro Guimarães Rios Radiology Radiology information systems Diagnostic imaging |
title_short |
Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician? |
title_full |
Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician? |
title_fullStr |
Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician? |
title_sort |
Radiology report: what is the opinion of the referring physician? |
author |
Ignácio,Fernando de Castro Guimarães Rios |
author_facet |
Ignácio,Fernando de Castro Guimarães Rios Souza,Luis Ronan Marquez Ferreira de D’Ippolito,Giuseppe Garcia,Mayara Martins |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Souza,Luis Ronan Marquez Ferreira de D’Ippolito,Giuseppe Garcia,Mayara Martins |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ignácio,Fernando de Castro Guimarães Rios Souza,Luis Ronan Marquez Ferreira de D’Ippolito,Giuseppe Garcia,Mayara Martins |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Radiology Radiology information systems Diagnostic imaging |
topic |
Radiology Radiology information systems Diagnostic imaging |
description |
Abstract Objective: To evaluate the opinion and perception of referring physicians regarding the radiology report, in order to develop tools that promote an improvement in its quality. Materials and Methods: We prepared a questionnaire containing ten multiple choice questions about the radiology report, administering it to 70 physicians (35 specialists and 35 residents working in specialties other than radiology). Results: Referring physicians (specialists and residents) showed a preference for structured reports, with a description explained in universal medical language and a complete conclusion listing the diagnostic possibilities with the degree of certainty. The examination technique should be described, and the final report is best presented when it contains the final chart, together with images, as hard copies and in digital format. The respondents also reported having confidence in the opinion of the radiologist and expressed the need for a direct channel of communication with the same. Conclusion: Referring physicians seek detailed reports (including a description of the examination technique), preferably structured, with objective language and relevant conclusions (the position of the radiologist on the case is important). It is necessary to discuss the differential diagnoses and provide a form of contact between the parties. Although referring physicians consider the radiologist opinion relevant, they also want to analyze the images on their own. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000500308 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842018000500308 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0115 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira v.51 n.5 2018 reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online) instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) instacron:CBR |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
instacron_str |
CBR |
institution |
CBR |
reponame_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br |
_version_ |
1754208939755438080 |